They were very clear about geographic limitations so spare me the false advertising ********.Apple advertised dual SIM as a feature, yet in most markets the eSIM is unusable so people practically only get a single SIM phone.
They were very clear about geographic limitations so spare me the false advertising ********.Apple advertised dual SIM as a feature, yet in most markets the eSIM is unusable so people practically only get a single SIM phone.
This is somewhat incorrect. I have 2 phones signed into the same iCloud account. I can receive iMessages and text messages on both phone sent to either of the numbers. I was actually going to sell my 2 phones and get 1 as it would be very convenient for me, however there are some limitation that would piss me off.It's important to note that as of today the iMessage\Facetime platform only allows you to support one phone number. But with Dual Sim in place there is no reason that they could not change this. You can already support several email address's, I would not be surprised to see them add support for 2 phone numbers.
Yes! My employer wants to install a root cert on my personal iPhone. I said heck no but as a result, I'm not always up-to-date with work items.In comparison to have to iPhones, the main issue for me is that you can not use both SIM cards for iMessage and FaceTime
Today I frequently send iMessages from both iPhones so only being able to send iMessages from one number is a big problem for me
Also for me both iPhones have different apps, email+calendar accounts, contacts, etc
They work independently from each other with no shared/synced data between the iPhones (other than iMessage communication for file transfer).
For this to work properly for me the iPhone should have multiple accounts, similar to accounts on Mac
This is somewhat incorrect. I have 2 phones signed into the same iCloud account. I can receive iMessages and text messages on both phone sent to either of the numbers. I was actually going to sell my 2 phones and get 1 as it would be very convenient for me, however there are some limitation that would piss me off.
I live in Canada and US and fly back and forth every few weeks, so i have a Canadian and US lines. When I am in US i simply call forward my number to my US line and leave it at home Editconnected to wifi in airplane mode and it's using WiFi calling, so when someone texts the Canadian number i get it on my US line even when im nowhere near my Canadian phone due to text forwarding through iCloud, if someone calls it my US line rings because its call forwarded..
When I am in Canada ATT doesn't allow call forwarding to international numbers but its fine I have north American roaming. So dual sim phone would only help me in Canada, but if the reports are true that iMessage number on the secondary line gets deactivated then this is totally useless. It would be awesome if you can have one line piggy back of the other data connection to have WiFI calling enabled.
A physical SIM will be easier because no carriers in Thailand (or the whole SE Asia) support the eSIM. So you basically paid for a “dual” SIM phone but got a practically single SIM phone. That’s the reality. No point in hoping for every carriers to support eSIM. Heck, if AT&T is still allowed to locked the eSIM, you know that’s a consumer hostile feature.
There is _one_ eSim slot and _one_ normal SIM slot. So you can't use two eSims. You need _one_ phone provider supporting eSim. Assuming that everyone continues to support SIM cards, you would try to put the provider that you use most of the time onto the eSim, so then you are free to use any other provider using the SIM, or switch between them (say you buy a SIM card on a holiday, use it for two weeks, throw it away).[doublepost=1537984700][/doublepost]So I'm a little confused here. If we will have eSIM capability, will the XS be able to support dual "virtual" (eSIM) SIM cards for the same feature as two physical SIMs?
I don't think it works like that. It's more like you have two phones in your pocket, and you choose which one to use. Except the two phones are in one package, and you use a switch in "Settings" and maybe they put it on the lock screen as well.So how will internet be determined? As in like, if I have better service with a certain provider. Will the iPhone XS switch to the better signal?
There is _one_ eSim slot and _one_ normal SIM slot. So you can't use two eSims. You need _one_ phone provider supporting eSim. Assuming that everyone continues to support SIM cards, you would try to put the provider that you use most of the time onto the eSim, so then you are free to use any other provider using the SIM, or switch between them (say you buy a SIM card on a holiday, use it for two weeks, throw it away).
[doublepost=1538035509][/doublepost]
I don't think it works like that. It's more like you have two phones in your pocket, and you choose which one to use. Except the two phones are in one package, and you use a switch in "Settings" and maybe they put it on the lock screen as well.
I think lots of people will use this to have their works phone and their private phone in one phone. So at work, you choose the works SIM because you want the company to pay, even if the signal is less good. And if it's private, you use your private phone SIM unless you want to cheat your company, no matter what signal is better.
It would be good if you could split your phone completely into "work" and "private". Like someone said his company wanted to install a root certificate on his work/private phone and he didn't like it - they would have a root certificate on one half of the phone but not on the other.I agree. I keep my work phone separate from my personal for legal/practical reasons and also because any one who has ever been laid off can attest, you don't want your personal and work stuff mixed together. It would be cool if eSIM could have a "protected work space" for corporate and work users that is walled off from the personal and can be controlled by the company. That protects my personal data from the company and the company data from me in the event of a departure.
If ATT supports it, then you can use the eSim for ATT as the primary line. If they don't, and having two SIMs is important to you, then you might look for another provider. Which would "encourage" ATT to support it as well.Yes, this is my fear. I'm on the Next Program and I have a feeling it will be locked down until the phone is paid off.
On a separate note, I'm a bit confused how this will work. Once the software update gets pushed, can I chose to designate the eSIM as my primary line (ATT) and keep the physical SIM slot open for when I roam (seeing not all countries use eSIM)? Or is the physical SIM slot always the primary line?
As I noted above- The limits on iMessage and Facetime are set by Apple and they can change them at any time. We can support more than one email address now, no reason that they can not add 2 phone numbers.
Considering carriers are still locking their phones today, the day eSIM will be universal won’t happen within our lifetime. Take note of it.I said IF, didn't I.
There will be a time sims are redundant, take note of it.
An eSim is much easier when you travel, for instance, you travel to Thailand (Just to pick one), you register your phone on the internet at home, as soon as you arrive it will work, how is a physical one more convenient, you have to go to the country, find a store, register which will take time, a physical sim is not free most of the times and you have to fiddle with the Sim card slot, oh crap, I forgot the Sim extractor!
I travel a lot, an eSim is MUCH better if all carriers support it, FACT.
You mean the Hong Kong ones (and you should be after the HK version).The Chinese models will be selling like hot cakes
It's not unusable. If you live in Thailand, yes you won't be able to use your main SIM as your eSIM.A physical SIM will be easier because no carriers in Thailand (or the whole SE Asia) support the eSIM. So you basically paid for a “dual” SIM phone but got a practically single SIM phone. That’s the reality. No point in hoping for every carriers to support eSIM. Heck, if AT&T is still allowed to locked the eSIM, you know that’s a consumer hostile feature.
It will be interesting to see if AT&T locks the eSIM to their network when you choose to activate it with them like they did with the iPad Pro eSIM.
Thats is not a fact. It is opinion. I have to say that I prefer physical SIM card. Im having tons of these from 4 or 5 countries and Im switching them constantly. As they are prepaid I just slide it in and done. In case of eSIm it much more complicated. Not to mention that I use SIM card to log in to all of the administration offices in Norway (tax, county, health etc). With eSIM I will be limited to the single phone and will have to go through the confirmation process every single time. Not fun. Therefore I asked friend to get me phone from China. I looked at the supported bands and it will work in Europe without any issues.
I don't think Apple would be okay with this... or the Justice Department for that matter.
In comparison to have to iPhones, the main issue for me is that you can not use both SIM cards for iMessage and FaceTime
Today I frequently send iMessages from both iPhones so only being able to send iMessages from one number is a big problem for me
Also for me both iPhones have different apps, email+calendar accounts, contacts, etc
They work independently from each other with no shared/synced data between the iPhones (other than iMessage communication for file transfer).
For this to work properly for me the iPhone should have multiple accounts, similar to accounts on Mac
There is _one_ eSim slot and _one_ normal SIM slot. So you can't use two eSims. You need _one_ phone provider supporting eSim. Assuming that everyone continues to support SIM cards, you would try to put the provider that you use most of the time onto the eSim, so then you are free to use any other provider using the SIM, or switch between them (say you buy a SIM card on a holiday, use it for two weeks, throw it away).
[doublepost=1538035509][/doublepost]
I don't think it works like that. It's more like you have two phones in your pocket, and you choose which one to use. Except the two phones are in one package, and you use a switch in "Settings" and maybe they put it on the lock screen as well.
I think lots of people will use this to have their works phone and their private phone in one phone. So at work, you choose the works SIM because you want the company to pay, even if the signal is less good. And if it's private, you use your private phone SIM unless you want to cheat your company, no matter what signal is better.
[doublepost=1538035547][/doublepost]
Remember that you will have two plans and pay for two plans. You don't pay twice just to get a better signal sometimes.
[doublepost=1538035723][/doublepost]
It would be good if you could split your phone completely into "work" and "private". Like someone said his company wanted to install a root certificate on his work/private phone and he didn't like it - they would have a root certificate on one half of the phone but not on the other.
[doublepost=1538035871][/doublepost]
If ATT supports it, then you can use the eSim for ATT as the primary line. If they don't, and having two SIMs is important to you, then you might look for another provider. Which would "encourage" ATT to support it as well.
All things old are new again, remember old CDMA phones that didn't have SIM cards? This is essentially the same thing with a new name.
Couldn't agree more.SIM locks should be illegal everywhere, there are countries where it actually is illegal.
Singapore, China and Isreal.
An eSim is much easier when you travel, for instance, you travel to Thailand (Just to pick one), you register your phone on the internet at home, as soon as you arrive it will work, how is a physical one more convenient, you have to go to the country, find a store, register which will take time, a physical sim is not free most of the times and you have to fiddle with the Sim card slot, oh crap, I forgot the Sim extractor!
I travel a lot, an eSim is MUCH better if all carriers support it, FACT.