Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Where's their big investigation into Windows 11's privacy violations and constant trashing of defaults and pushing Edge on you and the trash heap that is X gone?
Probably EU politicians are all Apple sheeps and secretly hoarding Macs🤣
Everyone forgot about Windows. It would have been fun to have round two M$ vs EU battle
 
Apple would be up there with the biggest. If Apple was a country, its market cap would put it at #7 in the world in terms of GDP

What a ridiculous comparison. Market cap is in no way analogous to GDP. Annual revenue would be the apt comparison.
 
Apple would be up there with the biggest. If Apple was a country, its market cap would put it at #7 in the world in terms of GDP

This is an absolutely absurd comparison that is not based in any understanding of finance.

A proper comparison would be Revenue and GDP. In the last 12-months, Apple’s revenue has been approximately $385 billion. That would put it at #41 between Iran and Pakistan.

Addendum: Iran and Pakistan were based on 2022 actuals. If you look at 2024 projections by the IMF, they are still #41, only now Apple would be between Colombia and South Africa.
 
Last edited:
What a ridiculous comparison. Market cap is in no way analogous to GDP. Annual revenue would be the apt comparison.
This is an absolutely absurd comparison that is not based in any understanding of finance.

A proper comparison would be Revenue and GDP. In the last 12-months, Apple’s revenue has been approximately $385 billion. That would put it at #41 between Iran and Pakistan.
#41... between Hong Kong and South Africa


In 2023, Apple’s annual revenue amounted to $383.29 billion. And according to GDP data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), that figure would slot Apple into the 41st position if it were a country, right between Hong Kong and South Africa.

In fact, Apple records higher revenue than the GDP of developed nations like New Zealand, Finland, and Portugal, let alone smaller ones like Bulgaria, Lithuania, and oil-rich Qatar. The bottom line is that Apple’s revenue puts it ahead of most countries’ GDP.



The point remains, Apple would be up there with some of the big and developed nations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
I am never ever going to install another browser than Safari. I am never ever going to install another Mail client than Mail. I am absolutely never ever going to install another App Store than the App Store, or Apps without using the App Store.
Great.
No problem.

As long as I can opt for competing apps (such as... a Mail app that supports PGP encryption).
Also I am free to choose? Nope. If a developer of an App I need leaves the App Store I don't have a choice
Yes you can: Choose another app that's downloadable from Apple.

Don't like it? Well, I don't like having to download all of my apps from a third party (Apple), rather than the developer themselves.

The difference is: There's lots of alternative choice for the apps you're using - but not lots of alternative choice for the operating system I'm using.
 
Governments are the biggest corporations and monopolies of all.

Governments represent the people. Where else can the populace directly, and legally, push back against corporations?

Corporations should have more power than the people who make up a country.

I am never ever going to install another browser than Safari. I am never ever going to install another Mail client than Mail. I am absolutely never ever going to install another App Store than the App Store, or Apps without using the App Store.

That's nice, but I absolutely will and would download and use alternatives, but I don't get that choice, on my phone, which I own/. I'm not leasing it, I'm not borrowing, I own it.
 
I don’t understand the obsession to delete first party apps. Remove them from the Home Screen and change the default app (which is being implemented). Why is the delete necessary?
You don't remember because you are talking about a$$le, but in the past there has been pressure on Microsoft too to remove their browser and other Windows components.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
This is a consumer rights organisation. They’re not regulators. They’re not some corporate lobby group. Their only purpose is literally to stand up for consumer rights.

If anti-consumer regulations were introduced, this is the group we’d hear from condemning that, just as much as when we hear from them about corporate anti-consumer practices.

We should all support that. There are few organisations as unambiguously on our side.
 
If you don’t agree with it, you can just use the AppStore and all the default apps Apple is giving you. Nothing changes for you!
What happens when apps leave the App Store and I need to download five different stores, reenter my payment details for each one, and then manage subscriptions across multiple accounts? How is that "nothing changing" for me?
 
Again. It will be great to have the option to have an iPhone complete without Apple services, so you have a choice. It won't be an option I want to take advantage of now, but I like having the choice. However, I am sad that due to the EU regulations, Apple is dropping pretty cool features like iPhone Mirroring, it was a function I was really looking forward to when it was presented in June.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mech986
If you don't trust the store, then don't use the App. It is really pretty simple. You do have a choice. When enough people do this, the developer will get the hint and move to a more trustworthy store. It is pretty simple to someone that understands capitalism.
If you don’t like the way Apple runs their business, don’t use Apple products. It is really simple. You do have a choice. When enough people do this, Apple will get the hint and change the way they run their business. It is pretty simple to someone that understands capitalism.
 
This is a consumer rights organisation. They’re not regulators. They’re not some corporate lobby group. Their only purpose is literally to stand up for consumer rights.

They don't seem to care about the consumers who, knowingly, bought into the Apple Ecosystem knowing that it is a closed ecosystem and preferring that to the other options available in the market.

That you like it doesn't mean that it's universally held to be in the "consumer interest."
 
Yes you can: Choose another app that's downloadable from Apple.

And you can choose Android to get multiple App Stores.

Don't like it? Well, I don't like having to download all of my apps from a third party (Apple), rather than the developer themselves.

No one is forcing you to download your apps from any particular place. You don’t have to use Apple products. You don’t have to eff them up for the rest of us. Go buy android. Buy it from an EU based-company.

The difference is: There's lots of alternative choice for the apps you're using - but not lots of alternative choice for the operating system I'm using.

Android has lots of app stores for you. There are many versions of Android running around. There are lots of other operating systems too. I listed many of them for you in a different thread. You poo poo them because they suck. Now you want to make iOS suck too.
 
the EU is terrible with these rules.
Technology should make things easier not more complicated.
I choose Apple because of there simplicity, integration etc. I still believe there should be a choice that I can chose a closed ecosystem. And I still think we need to make a fist against these rules. because trust me, it won't stop here.
 
I hope most people realize these rules are to protect consumers by giving them the freedom of choice. If big tech companies try to lock you in or misuse their power, it’s great to have those rules as a consumer.

If you don’t agree with it, you can just use the AppStore and all the default apps Apple is giving you. Nothing changes for you!

But now you’ve the possibility to use other stores, apps that weren’t possible before.

Be glad the EU uses their power by giving you freedom.

Otherwise we would still have the lightning cable and the new iMessage couldn’t communicate other than with other iPhones.

These rules aren’t only for Apple but apply to all big tech companies.
No, these rules are, as Vestager has indicated, an attempt to reduce the profits of Gatekeeper companies. The reason why everything seems disjointed (iPad is not a gatekeeper by the definition, but they decided they wanted it to be a gatekeeper anyway) is because she couldn’t literally have the rules written in that way. So, they’ve been trying to define other ways that they THOUGHT would yield the same result. Unfortunately for them, there’s no way to significantly reduce the profits of the Gatekeeper companies without defining that as the intent in the rules.
 
They don't seem to care about the consumers who, knowingly, bought into the Apple Ecosystem knowing that it is a closed ecosystem and preferring that to the other options available in the market.

That you like it doesn't mean that it's universally held to be in the "consumer interest."
And an independent organisation dedicated to nothing but advocating for consumer rights disagrees with you.

It’s your individual preferences that clearly don’t align with the consumer interest, not mine.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.