Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
except, if I am paying at an NFC terminal with an iPhone, I don't have the option to use another payment method, it's Apple Pay or the highway, so to speak. I would probably stick with Apple Pay but I can understand why others want some alternatives.
Wait - I use contactless payments on my iPhone 13 Pro and have my Visa designated as default. Is Apple moving toward making Apple Pay the only contactless payment option on iPhone? if so, I feel differently about that than what I was interpreting.
 
This should ruling should have happened first in Australia 5 years ago… but the authorities at the time couldn't see the forest for the trees, as they thought the banks were monopolising a fair market, rather than Apple. I'm glad to see the European Union has more foresight on the matter.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mhnd
This should ruling should have happened first in Australia 5 years ago… but the authorities at the time couldn't see the forest for the trees, as they thought the banks were monopolising a fair market, rather than Apple. I'm glad to see the European Union has more foresight on the matter.
To be fair, from the description you linked to, the banks were asking to collude in order to prevent a new competitor from entering the market. Sounds like a reasonable decision to me. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhnd
seems like Apple has been moving in the direction of opening this up, though not at the pace that some folks prefer.

Not a fan of using the force of law to make a company build a product to the specs that some prefer. This should just be a business decision
No one is asking Apple to build a product. They are asking to allow a developer to use the hardware inside the device for its intended purpose. Apple didn't invent NFC or even make the tech in their devices.

This is a facet of multiple issues Apple is facing with their API's being locked down and controlling everything under the sun on the iPhone and iPad.... which is totally the opposite of their Mac line. Imagine if when optical drives were a thing, Apple told everyone they were creating an API that only allowed DVD's sold or approved by Apple to be playable on their computers, despite their being open standards for DVD-play back and region codes. That's bascially what they are doing by locking down the NFC chip.

Or... they think iPhone users are too stupid to know that they are scanning their phones using an app they downloaded directly for a banks specific payment product. Which is kind of their argument about everything... and people defend them in droves.
 
Why is it apples fault another company will not work with them? Your examples are terrible and there are easy work around for all of them. Instead of QR codes they could just make cards with NFC built in. That’s cheap…anyone can do it now.
i wouldn't be surprised if almost 100% of EU banks have NFC in the cards
 
No one is asking Apple to build a product.
Except they are. Secure, documented APIs fit for public release don't just magically appear. Apple has to build the software necessary "to allow a developer to use the hardware inside the device for its intended purpose."
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhnd
When I punched this topic into my news search, I also ran into this from a couple of weeks back.

Maybe if Apple was actually working on something instead of claiming the old "security" ploy they would not be subject to this?
I'm honestly surprised apple haven't done it yet as that would be awesome to just use Apple Pay in apps and websites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dk001
NFC is everywhere, and banks can have their card added to Apple Pay, right? And businesses that did not want to use Apple Pay because they wanted to charge higher fees or scrap purchase data created their own QR code-based payment systems, right? I ask because I am trying to figure out why the EU would admit that developing a mobile payment platform is costly, then make a ridiculous claim that companies would not create their own systems when history has show that it has not prevented issuers from either allowing Apple Pay as a processor (the same way my bank uses Visa, and only Visa, as a processor) or coming up with their own systems that utilize QR codes and other competing standards.

Apple obviously profits off of Apple pay which is why lots of banks either don't participate or took their sweet time doing so, and many stores outright don't accept Apple pay at all.

The issue is that there are open standards for NFC and the only thing preventing people from using the hardware is Apple itself. On an Android device, this is not the case. Apple might as well dictate what images are allowed on their displays, or what wireless routers you can use to connect your phone too (like only Apple ones, if they still made them).
On Android, you can have Samsung pay alongside Google Pay along side a banks app allowing NFC payments or even enable work badges on a phone. Where payment platforms are proprietary is in their won apps with how they encode and decode account numbers, store, transmit, and charge fees.

If NFC wasn't already governed with open communications standards, and Apple actually invented the hardware it would be a totally different story here. Apple is saying on their App is allowed to use the NFC chip in the iPhone the way they like it.
 
When I punched this topic into my news search, I also ran into this from a couple of weeks back.

Maybe if Apple was actually working on something instead of claiming the old "security" ploy they would not be subject to this?
What makes you think they're not? Because Google put out a press release first? I've already said that I'd bet Apple's solution is coming next month at WWDC.

That's probably why the EU is putting out their press release now. Come June they can claim victory for something Apple was going to do anyway. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhnd
Lot of good input here I can see. :rolleyes: The reason some banks and financial institutions have not opened for customers to use Apple Pay has nothing to do with security. It is purely based on that the loose the data insight when allowing customers to use Apple Pay.
That’s absolutely why WalMart doesn’t use Apple Pay. To stores, Apple Pay is like a cash transaction as far as being able to be tracked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhnd
I live in the US and I would have to drive farther today to be back to POTS technology but it’s still not farther than 100 miles and I would still be in my home state. And pretty much all the states that surround my state are pretty much the same: a few larger population areas (cities of 15,000-300,000 people or more) with large areas of less than 50 people per square mile where a town of 3500 is considered large. These areas aren’t at the top of the communication technology scale or even close.
No one every inch of land in the US is at the top of communication technology. Cash is still a thing. :) BUT, if company is taking credit cards these days, they’re communicating every transaction back for verification and have been doing so far longer than they would have had the capability to do so in Europe.
 
Really, what you are saying here is not power to the people. What it really is, is power given to other corporations. The people will remain exactly where there are currently, subject to corporate and government say.
I'm on the fence with all of these proposed changes. Part of the reason I enjoy my little slice of the Apple ecosystem is its ease of use, security and less of a headache in dealing with "stuff".
As long as I can keep the other stuff out and the other stuff can't come in on its own, I guess I am ok with it.

Apple are free to make an API endpoint that allows app to use the NFC. This has, technically speaking, nothing to do with a walled garden. I know, I work with this kind of stuff.
 
Yep, power to the people … in the form of vote with your $$$.

I prefer cooperates being held reliable. Voting with your wallet only takes you so and so far. Just look at America and their so-called "freedom". Money didn't fix any of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sampire51
What makes you think they're not? Because Google put out a press release first? I've already said that I'd bet Apple's solution is coming next month at WWDC.

That's probably why the EU is putting out their press release now. Come June they can claim victory for something Apple was going to do anyway. :)

I almost didn't respond as your reply was a bit condescending and incorrect.
To your reply, I have no idea on this as it is an article I found. Hats off to Google as I think it is a good idea. Apple could be working on something like it however at this time, with no announcement, we as consumers have nothing to tell us either way.
 
Except they are. Secure, documented APIs fit for public release don't just magically appear. Apple has to build the software necessary "to allow a developer to use the hardware inside the device for its intended purpose."

Build new APIs?
From my previous dev days, there were "public" APIs which were documented and Apple only non-documented.
- Documented which we could use.
- Undocumented which were APIs that Apple leveraged for their functions/apps only and we could not use.
I don't think anything has changed lately.
So in all likelihood they exist, just not documented or shared with devs.
 
I prefer cooperates being held reliable. Voting with your wallet only takes you so and so far. Just look at America and their so-called "freedom". Money didn't fix any of that.
Look at blackberry to see what voting with your wallet means. I prefer this rather than regulation. But ymmv.
 
Apple obviously profits off of Apple pay which is why lots of banks either don't participate or took their sweet time doing so, and many stores outright don't accept Apple pay at all.

The issue is that there are open standards for NFC and the only thing preventing people from using the hardware is Apple itself. On an Android device, this is not the case. Apple might as well dictate what images are allowed on their displays, or what wireless routers you can use to connect your phone too (like only Apple ones, if they still made them).
On Android, you can have Samsung pay alongside Google Pay along side a banks app allowing NFC payments or even enable work badges on a phone. Where payment platforms are proprietary is in their won apps with how they encode and decode account numbers, store, transmit, and charge fees.

If NFC wasn't already governed with open communications standards, and Apple actually invented the hardware it would be a totally different story here. Apple is saying on their App is allowed to use the NFC chip in the iPhone the way they like it.
In my neck of the woods nearly most stores that have a newish terminal accept Apple Pay. Exceptions are some big box stores such as Walmart and Home Depot.

And again. If open nfc is a priority functionality then android has it.
 
Not sure what you mean. This was a case of focusing (BB) on the wrong market.
Precisely, BB blew it and people voted with their wallets. In this case it was the demise of BB but it serves as a wake up call to manufacturers of consumer oriented mass production devices to provide functionality that consumers want.

If sideloading, open nfc, alternative app stores were a priority to consumers these functionalities already exist in other platforms.
 
Precisely, BB blew it and people voted with their wallets. In this case it was the demise of BB but it serves as a wake up call to manufacturers of consumer oriented mass production devices to provide functionality that consumers want.

If sideloading, open nfc, alternative app stores were a priority to consumers these functionalities already exist in other platforms.

Ehhhhhh. Okay, I can kind of see it.
BB marketed to business while iPhone marketed to consumer. As a consumer it wasn't really voting with your wallet. I see this more as a case of BYOD killed the BB.
 
If I wanted 15 different apps to pay for things I'd buy an Android phone
Nobody said it has to be more apps. Just the wallet app would be fine, if only we could add any bank card or public transport card to it. (Like on any android phone. Without any security issues.)
 
Apple's cancellation of Apple Pay in Russia is scary warning to all countries. No nation wants to be at the mercy of Apple's San Francisco executive team
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: dk001 and Sampire51
As the world is shifting towards mobile payment across the world it is only fair that the people has access to the technology on fair terms and not on the cooperates terms. Power to the people.
Let them go buy Samsung with android os there! Now they
NFC is everywhere, and banks can have their card added to Apple Pay, right? And businesses that did not want to use Apple Pay because they wanted to charge higher fees or scrap purchase data created their own QR code-based payment systems, right? I ask because I am trying to figure out why the EU would admit that developing a mobile payment platform is costly, then make a ridiculous claim that companies would not create their own systems when history has show that it has not prevented issuers from either allowing Apple Pay as a processor (the same way my bank uses Visa, and only Visa, as a processor) or coming up with their own systems that utilize QR codes and other competing standards.
well you’re probably right on all of that. Not at you of course but where was EU and the Apple haters at when Walmart Target Kroger Home Depot and others were telling Apple to stick it up their rear end and we are not letting you in on our system. Now, the EU which does absolutely nothing except it seems is fining American tech companies with deep pockets. Just a bunch of ingrates to say the least.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.