Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My point is that whether something qualifies as a game console or a general purpose computer is (to my knowledge) not defined under any current law.

This distinction is something totally made up by this forum for the purposes of justifying why Apple deserves greater scrutiny than Nintendo and while that might pass muster with the common layman, I have a hard time seeing that argument holding up in court.

Fortunately the EC clearly defined what a gatekeeper is, and Nintendo doesn't qualify, because they don't create app economies that entrench millions of people and businesses.
 
It's really painful seeing Apple behave like this... In the long term they're absolutely going to lose this battle and it will harm their reputation. Instead of trying to squeeze as much profits as possible out of their monopoly while they still can, they should start acting in good faith and start healing the relationship with developers and regulators. Angering them even further will only make it more likely that bigger changes will be forced upon Apple.

To quote Steve Jobs: "I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been."
It’s painful seeing what the EU is doing. Only the hardcore base fans who are fans of Steve Job really care. It’s my opinion the rest who have read about this, see this is a struggle between some government who wants control over American tech and American tech.
 
I don't have to understand anything. I only have to know what my rights in the EU are. And Apple can't make me eat my cat or sacrifice a rat just because it's in their contract somewhere.
Erm…..no, but if you sign an agreement that says you need to abide to apples rules, which presumably means not to lie and insult them at every turn, as well as push updates for your app that circumvents those terms, then yes, Apple has every right to terminate that agreement.
 
Trade war sounds good. EU wouldn’t win anyways
Careful what you wish for. There is a lot of technology that the EU produces that the US depends on. Trade is about far more than social media apps and video games. While it is true that the US manufactures a lot of this technology themselves, the EU is still a very, very important supplier.

Just as one example: There are currently two major manufacturers of large airliners in the world today. One is US based, one is EU based. In case you haven't been paying attention, the US-based one is hurting just a teeny tiny little bit right now because of some unfortunate manufacturing problems with its most important model. A trade war with the EU would jeopardize the ability for US airlines to order planes from the one supplier that isn't currently in major trouble.
 
This is getting a bit ridiculous.

Would they do the same probe if a confectionary manufacturer gets delisted from a supermarket chain?
How about Amazon removing a marketplace account due to the owner not adhering to their policies?

This is not related to the fact that Apple not doing enough for alternative marketplaces - EU was right on that one.

Apple simply chooses not to go into business with EPIC on any of their services. It's completely in their right to do so.

EU waving the flag of free market and getting into forcing a business to do business with another business is not OK.
Well, we disagree. I have an expensive iPhone, Epic wants to give me a game (or sell me a game) and Apple is saying, no, Epic, you can’s sell it and no, stupid little iPhone owner, WE decide what you can and cannot play. (same for emulators, virtualisation etc). EU has decided it’s not up to Apple to decide that and they’re still doing it. More fines to follow. Apple is so stupid. It’s 100% predictable and more so, they’re really upsetting their userbase. Apple is ‘protecting’ me from using a 3rd party appstore when I go abroad for a while? Really? No, Apple, thank you very much.
 
Careful what you wish for. There is a lot of technology that the EU produces that the US depends on. Trade is about far more than social media apps and video games. While it is true that the US manufactures a lot of this technology themselves, the EU is still a very, very important supplier.

Just as one example: There are currently two major manufacturers of large airliners in the world today. One is US based, one is EU based. In case you haven't been paying attention, the US-based one is hurting just a teeny tiny little bit right now because of some unfortunate manufacturing problems with its most important model. A trade war with the EU would jeopardize the ability for US airlines to order planes from the one supplier that isn't currently in major trouble.
Airlines don’t make a lot of profit anyways. And that would hurt Airbus more than it would America. It would actually help America because they would have to buy from Boeing.
 
Erm…..no, but if you sign an agreement that says you need to abide to apples rules, which presumably means not to lie and insult them at every turn, as well as push updates for your app that circumvents those terms, then yes, Apple has every right to terminate that agreement.
..up to the point where the government of a given jurisdiction says that such terms are illegal.
 
I meant in general

Well this is a thread about the Epic issue. So I guess if the specific does not fit your anti-EU bill we can talk in general right?

The truth is, there is not targeting of US companies and you know that. Or at least, now you may understand that is not the case. No EU company currently has an App Store or interest in building one for now.

Consider if Apple and Microsoft were European companies. I'm sure you would recognize the principles I shared on my other post. It has nothing todo with being American or otherwise companies.
 
Well, we disagree. I have an expensive iPhone, Epic wants to give me a game (or sell me a game) and Apple is saying, no, Epic, you can’s sell it and no, stupid little iPhone owner, WE decide what you can and cannot play. (same for emulators, virtualisation etc). EU has decided it’s not up to Apple to decide that and they’re still doing it. More fines to follow. Apple is so stupid. It’s 100% predictable and more so, they’re really upsetting their userbase. Apple is ‘protecting’ me from using a 3rd party appstore when I go abroad for a while? Really? No, Apple, thank you very much.
I don’t believe they are upsetting their entire user base. I’m sure some are annoyed and might even leave apple. Epic tried to defraud apple, lost a lawsuit and are paying legal bills. Apple is well within their rights, imo.

One knows what apples ecosystem is about at this point. Buy an iPhone or not.
 
Erm…..no, but if you sign an agreement that says you need to abide to apples rules, which presumably means not to lie and insult them at every turn, as well as push updates for your app that circumvents those terms, then yes, Apple has every right to terminate that agreement.
Did you not read what I said? When that clause is illegal, Apple has no hold over this. Not while Apple agreed to follow the laws in said countries. If Apple says in the iTunes agreement that I vow to get a slave, then please tell me which country would enforce Apple's "claim"?
If Apple doesn't (which will likely be the case here), then this is another gamble of their poorly staffed legal team it seems.
Careful what you wish for. There is a lot of technology that the EU produces that the US depends on. Trade is about far more than social media apps and video games. While it is true that the US manufactures a lot of this technology themselves, the EU is still a very, very important supplier.

Just as one example: There are currently two major manufacturers of large airliners in the world today. One is US based, one is EU based. In case you haven't been paying attention, the US-based one is hurting just a teeny tiny little bit right now because of some unfortunate manufacturing problems with its most important model. A trade war with the EU would jeopardize the ability for US airlines to order planes from the one supplier that isn't currently in major trouble.
Last time I checked Arm was British, right? Let's see what Apple can do without its A and M chips whose intellectual property is superceded by Arm. Imagine them moving to the British part that is in the EU. Apple would lose its high ground in a fortnight.
 
Epic has proven to be the bad actor in submitting software with hidden functionality, breached a contract because of their hidden functionality, and has continued to whine and complain to anyone who would listen that they are not the bad guy, but big bad Apple is.

It is also possible that both parties are a "bad guy" in different ways.

What I don't know, because I'm not a lawyer in the E.U. (or anywhere else for that matter), is whether it's part of Apple's strategy to more or less expose before the court what Epic's hidden functionalities are.

That could have serious implications on the whole of the DMA that might have sounded good in concept but may not have been thought through, especially if it enables software manufacturers to exploit users in ways that run contrary to the spirit of E.U. tech laws and consumer protections, e.g. GDPR.
 
Apple didn’t pick this fight. I don’t think this is a case of mediation because the EU are flexing. Maybe in the future.

Maybe Epic could have come to the table instead of whining like babies because they can’t get their fantasy world, baby game on the market on their own terms.. OMG. I just had a flash back many years ago when my 2 year old was stamping their feet crying and whining for 10 minutes. Thanks Epic!

There are more important things going on in Europe than writing code to scam people out of "V-Bucks".
Oh you think Epic are babies for talking to the courts instead of taking it laying down?

it seems more Apple is the one who act like babies instead of as adults and talking to the courts instead of lashing out like they own the place
 
Oh you think Epic are babies for talking to the courts instead of taking it laying down?

it seems more Apple is the one who act like babies instead of as adults and talking to the courts instead of lashing out like they own the place
Epic is the one who tried to defraud apple. They lost their court case and have to pay legal fees and lost hundreds of millions in revenue. Who’s the crybaby? It ain’t apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.