Someone really likes the wealth of a company over the welfare of a whole bloc.Trade war sounds good it’s not like the EU would win
Someone really likes the wealth of a company over the welfare of a whole bloc.Trade war sounds good it’s not like the EU would win
Everyone agrees with that. The issue for apple is that there zero need for their SDK to make software for iOS.Apple still has a right to ask developer's to pay a fee for their SDKs.
No different to Epic, Microsoft, Sony, Google etc.
My point is that whether something qualifies as a game console or a general purpose computer is (to my knowledge) not defined under any current law.
This distinction is something totally made up by this forum for the purposes of justifying why Apple deserves greater scrutiny than Nintendo and while that might pass muster with the common layman, I have a hard time seeing that argument holding up in court.
It’s painful seeing what the EU is doing. Only the hardcore base fans who are fans of Steve Job really care. It’s my opinion the rest who have read about this, see this is a struggle between some government who wants control over American tech and American tech.It's really painful seeing Apple behave like this... In the long term they're absolutely going to lose this battle and it will harm their reputation. Instead of trying to squeeze as much profits as possible out of their monopoly while they still can, they should start acting in good faith and start healing the relationship with developers and regulators. Angering them even further will only make it more likely that bigger changes will be forced upon Apple.
To quote Steve Jobs: "I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been."
Erm…..no, but if you sign an agreement that says you need to abide to apples rules, which presumably means not to lie and insult them at every turn, as well as push updates for your app that circumvents those terms, then yes, Apple has every right to terminate that agreement.I don't have to understand anything. I only have to know what my rights in the EU are. And Apple can't make me eat my cat or sacrifice a rat just because it's in their contract somewhere.
Careful what you wish for. There is a lot of technology that the EU produces that the US depends on. Trade is about far more than social media apps and video games. While it is true that the US manufactures a lot of this technology themselves, the EU is still a very, very important supplier.Trade war sounds good. EU wouldn’t win anyways
Well, we disagree. I have an expensive iPhone, Epic wants to give me a game (or sell me a game) and Apple is saying, no, Epic, you can’s sell it and no, stupid little iPhone owner, WE decide what you can and cannot play. (same for emulators, virtualisation etc). EU has decided it’s not up to Apple to decide that and they’re still doing it. More fines to follow. Apple is so stupid. It’s 100% predictable and more so, they’re really upsetting their userbase. Apple is ‘protecting’ me from using a 3rd party appstore when I go abroad for a while? Really? No, Apple, thank you very much.This is getting a bit ridiculous.
Would they do the same probe if a confectionary manufacturer gets delisted from a supermarket chain?
How about Amazon removing a marketplace account due to the owner not adhering to their policies?
This is not related to the fact that Apple not doing enough for alternative marketplaces - EU was right on that one.
Apple simply chooses not to go into business with EPIC on any of their services. It's completely in their right to do so.
EU waving the flag of free market and getting into forcing a business to do business with another business is not OK.
Airlines don’t make a lot of profit anyways. And that would hurt Airbus more than it would America. It would actually help America because they would have to buy from Boeing.Careful what you wish for. There is a lot of technology that the EU produces that the US depends on. Trade is about far more than social media apps and video games. While it is true that the US manufactures a lot of this technology themselves, the EU is still a very, very important supplier.
Just as one example: There are currently two major manufacturers of large airliners in the world today. One is US based, one is EU based. In case you haven't been paying attention, the US-based one is hurting just a teeny tiny little bit right now because of some unfortunate manufacturing problems with its most important model. A trade war with the EU would jeopardize the ability for US airlines to order planes from the one supplier that isn't currently in major trouble.
Simple. US government wants to have a stronger position in talks with Apple so they actually "encourage" EU to attack Apple.And why does the U.S. government allow Europe to target American tech companies like this to help their own tech companies like this?
..up to the point where the government of a given jurisdiction says that such terms are illegal.Erm…..no, but if you sign an agreement that says you need to abide to apples rules, which presumably means not to lie and insult them at every turn, as well as push updates for your app that circumvents those terms, then yes, Apple has every right to terminate that agreement.
I meant in general
Ridiculous notion. You’re implying that this extremely contentious rule was set up without experts in the field? Come on now.My bet is the EU has tangled itself up without fully understanding the technology
I don’t believe they are upsetting their entire user base. I’m sure some are annoyed and might even leave apple. Epic tried to defraud apple, lost a lawsuit and are paying legal bills. Apple is well within their rights, imo.Well, we disagree. I have an expensive iPhone, Epic wants to give me a game (or sell me a game) and Apple is saying, no, Epic, you can’s sell it and no, stupid little iPhone owner, WE decide what you can and cannot play. (same for emulators, virtualisation etc). EU has decided it’s not up to Apple to decide that and they’re still doing it. More fines to follow. Apple is so stupid. It’s 100% predictable and more so, they’re really upsetting their userbase. Apple is ‘protecting’ me from using a 3rd party appstore when I go abroad for a while? Really? No, Apple, thank you very much.
Don’t ya reckon the government of a 27 nation bloc can do more than one thing at once?There are more important things going on in Europe than writing code to scam people out of "V-Bucks"
Did you not read what I said? When that clause is illegal, Apple has no hold over this. Not while Apple agreed to follow the laws in said countries. If Apple says in the iTunes agreement that I vow to get a slave, then please tell me which country would enforce Apple's "claim"?Erm…..no, but if you sign an agreement that says you need to abide to apples rules, which presumably means not to lie and insult them at every turn, as well as push updates for your app that circumvents those terms, then yes, Apple has every right to terminate that agreement.
Last time I checked Arm was British, right? Let's see what Apple can do without its A and M chips whose intellectual property is superceded by Arm. Imagine them moving to the British part that is in the EU. Apple would lose its high ground in a fortnight.Careful what you wish for. There is a lot of technology that the EU produces that the US depends on. Trade is about far more than social media apps and video games. While it is true that the US manufactures a lot of this technology themselves, the EU is still a very, very important supplier.
Just as one example: There are currently two major manufacturers of large airliners in the world today. One is US based, one is EU based. In case you haven't been paying attention, the US-based one is hurting just a teeny tiny little bit right now because of some unfortunate manufacturing problems with its most important model. A trade war with the EU would jeopardize the ability for US airlines to order planes from the one supplier that isn't currently in major trouble.
Maybe not all well.Don’t ya reckon the government of a 27 nation bloc can do more than one thing at once?
Something very different from the glorious US I suppose?Maybe not all well.
Nope same as far as I can tell.Something very different from the glorious US I suppose?
Epic has proven to be the bad actor in submitting software with hidden functionality, breached a contract because of their hidden functionality, and has continued to whine and complain to anyone who would listen that they are not the bad guy, but big bad Apple is.
Oh you think Epic are babies for talking to the courts instead of taking it laying down?Apple didn’t pick this fight. I don’t think this is a case of mediation because the EU are flexing. Maybe in the future.
Maybe Epic could have come to the table instead of whining like babies because they can’t get their fantasy world, baby game on the market on their own terms.. OMG. I just had a flash back many years ago when my 2 year old was stamping their feet crying and whining for 10 minutes. Thanks Epic!
There are more important things going on in Europe than writing code to scam people out of "V-Bucks".
Trade war sounds good it’s not like the EU would win
Epic is the one who tried to defraud apple. They lost their court case and have to pay legal fees and lost hundreds of millions in revenue. Who’s the crybaby? It ain’t apple.Oh you think Epic are babies for talking to the courts instead of taking it laying down?
it seems more Apple is the one who act like babies instead of as adults and talking to the courts instead of lashing out like they own the place