HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
Lightning is a better designed plug and a better use of hardware real estate.
People seem to forget that Apple was actually one of the designers of USB-C, one of the first pushers of USB-C, and likely the biggest input in the design of USB-C.
In fact, USB-C's design is awfully similar to previous Apple designs like the power port in an older Mac mini. Apple just took it off their design drawer and offered to it the paupers who were struggling with USB-A and micro-USB:
View attachment 2197424
In any case, the Lightning port continued being the most efficient and robust port for the iPhone. If Apple had updated the standard to support the same speeds and power specifications of USB-C it would completely be the better port, but more expensive and proprietary so basically the same as the iPhone is to Android, same reason why Android (and Windows) will always have more marketshare.
So finish the point here by writing the magic line that never gets written in all pro-lightning, anti-USBc arguments:
Apple is WRONG for using USBc in all of the other products they offer.
I pretty much NEVER see that. Instead, apparently, USBc is fine where Apple is already using it and only wrong where it is not used yet. Where are these kinds of cases in the other Apple product threads where USBc IS the port?
Last edited: