will just state that I disagree strongly that a platform owner shouldn't have a say or doesn't have an interest in what runs on its platform.
Oh, we completely agree on that.
An owner of a platform (such as a marketplace, TV channel or streaming service, even an operating system) should be allowed to have a say and be free to decide on what runs and what not.
Only when said platform has obtained monopoly/duopoly/oligopoly status and power should government intervene and limit their right to “have a say” and censor or charge as they please with legislation or regulatory action.
…which is exactly what we’re looking at here.
And how did we get to that? How was such duopoly created? Through operating system developers having deliberately
chosen to
“give away their IP and services for free” to anyone and for most purposes.
We obviously disagree on you wanting to give the
smaller firm in that resulting duopoly a free pass and exempt from all such legislation/regulation. Even though not in terms of units or users, they account for about
half of that market (mobile app spend) in terms of revenue.
👉 Once you monopolise (“duopolise”) a market by giving away your IP and services for free, you’ve revoked your right to cherry-picking.