It's not picking at straws. Read my explanation of why your water analogy does not work below. But ok, if it makes you feel better, go ahead and believe that
Why not? You're saying that I'm not the best judge of what I need. Thus you must be saying that someone else is the best judge of what I need.
Nice misquote. I never said that, but I guess your idea of intelligent discussion is to misquote people by truncating what they say, twisting the context, and attacking that. What I said was far more nuanced.
Let me quote your entire post then.
You NEED water. Prove me otherwise.
My point? Sometimes you are not the best judge of what you need.
Your argument is: '
You need water. Prove me wrong. You can't? See, that's why I'm a better judge of what you need than you are.'
Of course nobody can prove that you're wrong about water being a necessity- that's common knowledge. So how exactly does that argument cement your ground as a superior judge?
Now you are getting it. What I responded to was the idiotic relativism expressed in one specific post (not that the poster is idiotic, rather the relativistic position that is so common in our society is idiotic). Now you might rightfully ask me, how is that relevant to this thread? My answer is someone said (a), another responded with this relativistic nonsense (b) to deny (a). So I pointed out (b) doesn't work so that our poster could better formulate his criticism of (a), which does merit criticism. That's the relevance.
Big words, big man. Right then.
No matter how you try to cut it, the poster you were quoting was correct in saying that people should not tell others what they need.
Unless they don't know anything about the topic, in this case, computers. But since he's on a forum I'm guessing he isn't completely ignorant about computers and is fully capable of making his own, informed, decision.
The cold thing makes sense, because I am not a doctor. I do not know what is wrong with me and I do not know what will fix me. I will assume the doctor knows what he is telling me to do as he has gone to medical school, so I will take medicine. Have you gone to make-decisions-for-other-people school?
Let me try another track on you guys/girls since analogies and counter-examples seem too difficult. You are claiming that with regard to computers, each individual is his own best judge. That is your claim. Consider me a complete fool, though a scrupulous one. I'll now ask you, why should I believe this claim. What proof have you to confirm it?
Let's use an example, shall we?
A wants an all-in-one desktop. He desires smooth performance for his internet browsing without requiring overly powerful components, so it cannot be too costly. He chooses a refurb iMac.
B wants a lightweight laptop with a small screen. He chooses an 11" MacBook Air.
C wants a gaming laptop, and wants to be able to run all the latest games at maximum graphics and native resolution without any lag. He chooses an Alienware M18x.
Now, tell me why you would be a better judge than each individual user, and tell me one blanket statement that would work for all three users.