I presumed AAPL would wait until the "Back to School" promotions were over (September 25 in the US) before announcing any new versions of products that were part of that promotion.
They already have one right now... it's called the iPhone 7 and it's their "new" budget phone. If you understand business at all then you must understand something called ROI (return on investment). There simply isn't enough ROI to engineer, design, market and manufacture a brand new small screened "budget" device. Trying to get that return by selling a "premium" small screened phone at a high price would fail miserably in the market.
The SE is dead. If you need a new budget phone the iPhone 7 (or 8 if you want a step-up) are your best options.
Few people understand your eloquently stated post.
The SE is too niche now because the mass market wants large screens. Sure, there are SE diehards, but not enough to make the cost of the project worth the effort. Apple has all the data and the fact it’s not here confirms it isn’t needed.
I still think it might make a comeback in March.
I would like to hear what you would consider to be innovative. What should they have done that they didn't?"Everything Apple Didn't Announce at Today's Event": anything innovative.
They already have one right now... it's called the iPhone 7 and it's their "new" budget phone. If you understand business at all then you must understand something called ROI (return on investment). There simply isn't enough ROI to engineer, design, market and manufacture a brand new small screened "budget" device. Trying to get that return by selling a "premium" small screened phone at a high price would fail miserably in the market.
The SE is dead. If you need a new budget phone the iPhone 7 (or 8 if you want a step-up) are your best options.
I know that's not what SE fans want to hear, but that's just how it works. I think it's also safe to assume that if the majority of these SE customers are die hard iPhone buyers then they will purchase whatever is offered (around the SE price point) as a replacement.
I would be happy if they just improved the battery and increased the CPU and storage options. Maybe an improvement for the camera as well. They don't need to redesign the whole thing...
Umm...I give Cook & AAPL a D+ for what they announced today.
Usually, an "S" year brings some Engineering Accomplishment.
So far, I've haven't been able to discover what that might be.
Anybody ???
I've had CNBC on ALL day long, & the so-called Pro Stock Analysts we're ALL hyping AAPL today ... I smell something fishy there !
To this EE turned software developer, Cook & AAPL blew it today ! ... where's the Beef, Cook ???
What the hell are they doing with ALL of their Coin ... is it simply ALL going into Stock Buybacks ???
Absolutely correct. I resell phones as a side business and the iPhone SE is one of the most difficult phones to move. Very few people seem to be interested in it despite the specs being on par with the 6s. They just don’t want that size anymore. It’s easier to sell even an iPhone 6 than it is an SE. I don’t think Apple could sell very many of them unless they retailed it for something extremely cheap like $199 full price.They already have one right now... it's called the iPhone 7 and it's their "new" budget phone. If you understand business at all then you must understand something called ROI (return on investment). There simply isn't enough ROI to engineer, design, market and manufacture a brand new small screened "budget" device. Trying to get that return by selling a "premium" small screened phone at a high price would fail miserably in the market.
The SE is dead. If you need a new budget phone the iPhone 7 (or 8 if you want a step-up) are your best options.
The SE, like the iPad mini, catered to a vocal minority of tech journos and Apple watchers. I’m sure a lot of non-Apple pundits liked the SE, but not enough to make it a full time product.They already have one right now... it's called the iPhone 7 and it's their "new" budget phone. If you understand business at all then you must understand something called ROI (return on investment). There simply isn't enough ROI to engineer, design, market and manufacture a brand new small screened "budget" device. Trying to get that return by selling a "premium" small screened phone at a high price would fail miserably in the market.
The SE is dead. If you need a new budget phone the iPhone 7 (or 8 if you want a step-up) are your best options.
But at some point the internals change so much that it would actually be a total redesign even if it looks the same. I understand many of the SE fans are upset because they loved their little phones, but Apple doesn't think with emotions. They think as a business. Can a business case be made? I'm going to out out on a limb (but not that far) and say the answer is no. They ran the numbers and found a much better business case can be made by making the iPhone 7 their introductory budget iPhone.
An expensive small screened phone just wouldn't survive in today's premium market. There were many people that bought the SE because they liked the size, but I promise many more bought it on price. Throwing huge amounts of development costs into a phone that people expect to be priced cheap is a good way to start losing money on a product line.
"Everything Apple Didn't Announce at Today's Event": anything innovative.
I'd say they're trying to phase out all of these different screen sizes so make future software development easier. iOS 12 has to support the 5S as well as the SE, iOS 13 might drop all 4" screens all together... well, maybe iOS14 anyway
Only in the Apple world was the SE cheap, loads of other manufacturers selling much less hardware make profit on their investments, selling them for cheaper.
I'd say they're trying to phase out all of these different screen sizes so make future software development easier. iOS 12 has to support the 5S as well as the SE, iOS 13 might drop all 4" screens all together... well, maybe iOS14 anyway
I give Cook & AAPL a D+ for what they announced today.
Usually, an "S" year brings some Engineering Accomplishment.
So far, I've haven't been able to discover what that might be.
Anybody ???
I've had CNBC on ALL day long, & the so-called Pro Stock Analysts we're ALL hyping AAPL today ... I smell something fishy there !
To this EE turned software developer, Cook & AAPL blew it today ! ... where's the Beef, Cook ???
What the hell are they doing with ALL of their Coin ... is it simply ALL going into Stock Buybacks ???
Not just the 7; I’m sure the 6s (and possibly the SE as well) will still be sold in the most price-sensitive countries, for maybe around $379-399. Given the speed increase of iOS 12 over iOS 11 the A9/2GB platform of the 6s/SE is easily good for 2-3 years.But at some point the internals change so much that it would actually be a total redesign even if it looks the same. I understand many of the SE fans are upset because they loved their little phones, but Apple doesn't think with emotions. They think as a business. Can a business case be made? I'm going to out out on a limb (but not that far) and say the answer is no. They ran the numbers and found a much better business case can be made by making the iPhone 7 their introductory budget iPhone.
An expensive small screened phone just wouldn't survive in today's premium market. There were many people that bought the SE because they liked the size, but I promise many more bought it on price. Throwing huge amounts of development costs into a phone that people expect to be priced cheap is a good way to start losing money on a product line.
October needs to come faster. I want a new Mac mini