Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You are not going to get a mac mini. Look, Apple just released a near $800 as "budget", that's flagship prices. Apple are no longer an computer company, but a fashion company. The only way anybody is getting a mini is with a hackintosh.

Sucks. I have been holding out for a long time on a headless machine that is sub $500. Looks like I'll be getting a nuc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnixGoon
Why doesn't this article mention Mac Pro?

We've gotta press Apple for a computer we can upgrade and spec to our liking. I want more graphics card options. I want Nvidia back in the Mac. I want the ability to upgrade my Mac Pro 5 years later with a new CPU etc...
I really hope Apple can do everyone a favor and make a competitively priced workstation Mac...
I honestly really don't give a **** about a design premium... They should make this Mac Pro simple and competitively priced so I can justify moving staff off of Windows PC to do heavy compute and development work.

After the debacle of NVidia chip failures in Macbooks at the start of the 2010s (I mean, just watch Louis Rossmann YouTube videos), it's just not going to happen. Likely was a compelling reason that Apple switched to AMD as an exclusive vendor.
 
I think you'll find that a lot of them went to the 6/6S when they came out as the 4.7" wasn't seen as that much bigger, then dropped the 6S's in the bin the minute the SE came out. I was one of them at least...

I did exactly this. I would happily pay a premium for a high-spec, small phone that comfortably fits in a pocket. Guess that makes me crazy these days....
 
I really don't get what's hard about a Mac mini, or even a Mac mini Pro, refresh. Keep the same physicals/footprint, update the processors, chipset and ports then instead of hardwiring everything in simply put 2 x NVMe and 2 x RAM slots under the round disc foot (or flip off base). What's so hard about that?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: StoneyG
I did exactly this. I would happily pay a premium for a high-spec, small phone that comfortably fits in a pocket. Guess that makes me crazy these days....

I don't think the SE, in concept or in practice, is really dead.
  • Apple no longer sells the SE at their own retail shops, but some carriers still offer them as new, strongly indicating that the SE is still being manufactured.
  • Recall that the SE was first released in April - far out of phase from the "flagship" iPhones. There is a tremendous logistics advantage to spreading out releases.
  • Wireless charging suggests that the SE requires a new non-metal body style, perhaps a body closer in materials to the 5C.
So don't give up hope. After all, Apple recently improved the old AirPort Express with AirPlay2. Your hope is not ridiculous.
 
Umm...

The Watch 4 has the first ever ECG AND it is blessed by the AHA and FDA. The watch was also completely redesigned and has a 30% bigger screen.

There are TWO brand new iPhones. The Xs Max is the bigger screen version of the #1 smartphone in the world.

The 6.1 Xr is a BRAND NEW phone with 6 colors.

The GPU is 50% faster.

The A12 is a MONSTER...truly the best mobile silicon and where engineering shines.

The neural engine performance is staggering. 600 billion operations per second in A11 to 5 TRILLION which enables amazing photos, crazy options for photo editing, faster FaceID and more AR ability.

The fact you don’t acknowledge or understand the innovation doesn’t mean it’s not there.

I was discussing this with a friend. I think we've hit the wall (FTM) on giant leaps in innovative features. What we've been seeing and will continue to see over the next few years are smaller innovations that add up over time and performance increases. To the casual observer, each new version won't seem that much different from the previous, But compare the latest with a 2-3 year old model and you'll see big differences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tresmith
Times change. Sales of desktops/laptops have basically collapsed, dropping from 350 million in 2012 to 250 million in 2017—and most of those are Windows boxes.

Apple would wither to irrelevance if they just focused on computers. There’s a reason Jobs dropped “Computer” from Apple’s name in 2007. After iPhone, he saw the future, and it’s not (only) computers.

Then collapse, I do not care for phones and will never do.
 
I was discussing this with a friend. I think we've hit the wall (FTM) on giant leaps in innovative features. What we've been seeing and will continue to see over the next few years are smaller innovations that add up over time and performance increases. To the casual observer, each new version won't seem that much different from the previous, But compare the latest with a 2-3 year old model and you'll see big differences.
The neural engine is insane under the hood upgrades. I think it's clear Apple has plans for major computing being done on mobile. I love seeing the jumps in performance because it speaks to the long term strategy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flur
Right but Desktop GPUs are hot swappable in the Mac Pros and in PCs. I'm just saying expand the vendor options.
This used to be a thing in the G5 towers. We need another tower from Apple, the tower design is not dead..
And the trash can design is expensive and pointless (it even overheats it self)... Nice job over designing Apple...
I think the KISS approach needs to be taken to the pro tower lineup.

Right, but have you taken an honest look at apple over the past 4-5 years?

-iMac: highly integrated, laptop graphics, very custom/un serviceable
-iMac Pro: basically what you're asking for without any of the upgradeability
-Macbook pro, touchbar: not found any any other device, no magic keyboard sold that has it, as a result limited 3rd party support (pointless) Oh yeah, and instead of adding TB3 or USB C like other laptop manfs. they just nuked all the other ports.
-Macbook Air: loved, budget, not touched in years
-Mac Mini: barely touched/given any attention
-Macbook: turned into an overpriced iPad running macOS with a permanent keyboard and no touchscreen. (they have the same # of ports!)
-Mac Pro: the trashcan. Strange upgradeability, weird very non-standard design. Can't innovate anymore i'm starting to think so.
-Apple watch: like the iPad, late to the game, way after other smartwatches.
-iPhone: haven't had a reason to upgrade since the 6

Everything they're making is so stylized and run through their industrial design department.. just LOOK at their actions over the years, how can you honestly say things like "They should make this Mac Pro simple and competitively priced so I can justify moving staff off of Windows PC to do heavy compute and development work." and be serious? That Apple is long gone, you are looking to the wrong company to fufill your desires. They aren't going to suddenly flip a switch and start doing things completely different, they're not "hiding" the products and designs that you'd really like and just holding out on you. It isn't even on their radar, they're not giving it a second thought. People who complain like this need to move on. I agree with you in the sense that I also want what you want, but I'm realistic enough to see that it's never going to happen and you're just preparing yourself for seasonal disappointment.

Whoever said it above was right, Apple is now a fashion company. They're all about the phones, that's Tim's thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dutchyonabike
That’s not eloquent. The complaint was that there’s not a modern, small phone, and your reply is essentially, “you can’t complain that Apple has moved away from small phones because the market has moved away from small phones.”

While it may be true that the market has moved to bigger phones, that doesn’t mean people can’t complain about that very fact.

As for your claim that Apple has all the data they need, you’re implying that Apple is infallible and that if they did something, it’s because that’s exactly what the market demands. By that logic, the market no longer demands updated computers with decent graphics chips and working keyboards. I’ve been a loyal Apple user for decades, but I’m not afraid to admit that sometimes they screw up.
They can screw up, but if the market wanted an updated SE, it would exist. Period, end of story.

That said, it STILL might come back at an "off peak" time in another event, but it will never be updated during the major iPhone event. It cannibalizes sales. This basic product mix is something companies can really nail down and Apple has proven they are masters at selling the right product at the right price. Who is better at it? No company is perfect, but Apple is probably the best consumer products company of all time and executes quarter after quarter after quarter. I think questioning their strategy that has worked better than any strategy in corporate history is just being a vocal minority. When the facts change, I'll question their strategy.

And yes, with my logic, the market isn't demanding updated computers as fast as you think is necessary. Laptops/desktops have a longer useful life (particularly Apple hardware) and they have updated the MacBook Pro line, substantially. Your keyboard gripe is the same tired one that is again a vocal minority. Where is your data on how many keyboards "don't work?"
 
Let's address the real elephants in the room of what was not announced:

- Taser-equipped iPhone.
- PowerBook G5

:D

With the rumors of a "refreshed" MacBook Air, I'm curious if such an update could supplant both the current MBA and the low end MacBook. Doing so might create a more distinct division between the MacBook and the MacBook Pro, especially if the MBP comes with the Touch Bar while the MB does not.
 
They can screw up, but if the market wanted an updated SE, it would exist. Period, end of story.

That would require Apple to be omniscient and infallible, neither of which is the case. They obviously do a pretty good job of anticipating what the market wants, but they are not perfect. The story is not over.

How could an updated SE cannibilize sales if the market doesn't want it?

Your claim is that whatever is on the market at any given time is exactly what customers want, and that's just absurd. I don't know if you believe that's true for all industries, all companies, or if Apple just has a remarkable ability that every other company lacks. Either way, you are incorrect.
 
Basically all these products are not the focus for Apple anymore. They don't make a lot of money from it and it's a waste of time to put so much effort on it. iPad Pro is in decline and iPad Mini is dead. Mac Mini, MacBook Air, iMac people would rather buy MacBook Pro it doesn't matter if they're professional. AirPower probably Apple realized that people would rather buy $10 Qi charger from Amazon than buying $129 charger. Good luck somebody might be working on it as a sideline project. The focus is iPhone, Apple Watch and Appstore that's where the money is.
 
That's funnily enough pretty much the same that was said back in 2016 when the SE has been released.

And guess what? This assessment turned out to be wrong. The SE flew out of the shelves, massively surpassed Apple's own estimations, and made for something between a fifth and a quarter of all sold iPhones in 2016. Which would mean about 50 million SEs have been sold just in that year.

For comparison: according to estimations (as there are no offical numbers since Apple is apparently too embarrassed), the Apple Watch had sold about 30 million devices by late 2017. In total. Over its whole lifetime.

But the former is an unprofitable niche, while the latter is not?

Have the sales of the SE dropped by then? Yes, almost for sure. But for the simple reason that there never was an updated version of it.

And yet, Apple keeps updating a device that barely registers in their annual earnings report, but buries one that has proven to meet a massive demand?

Tell me again how this makes sense.
Apple is embarrassed to say how many watches they sell? It's the #1 watch in the world, so...

Apple is smart to not say how many they sold or it will end up like the nonsense we deal with as investors for unit growth on iPhone. Investors will wring their hands about Apple selling 50M iPhones or 51M in a 90 day period, as if it matters. I wish they'd stop giving any unit sales data.

Your articles are simple guesses as to unit sales for iPhone and Watch. There is no way Apple sold 50M SEs in 2016....lol. Just look at ASP. No one truly knows, except Apple. Also, you assume because people bought the SE, they didn't buy another iPhone? Like the iPhone 7 or iPhone 8, for higher margins? A missed iPhone SE sale is not a switch to Android. Again, it makes sense because Apple hasn't updated it. This means those SE customers are still using their SE or have bought other iPhones in the lineup.

I don't know all the reasons for not updating the SE, but they are probably related to margins and cost of development for a niche phone.
 
I don't know all the reasons for not updating the SE, but they are probably related to margins and cost of development for a niche phone.

Appeasing the budget demographic is not one of Apple's strengths.

For Apple, it's quite simply they value revenue and profit over the number of users. Otherwise, they would've taken a hit to acquire more users in that demographic. It's also going to be hard for them to compete in that spectrum due to the amount of competition compared to the higher end tiers.
 
That would require Apple to be omniscient and infallible, neither of which is the case. They obviously do a pretty good job of anticipating what the market wants, but they are not perfect. The story is not over.

How could an updated SE cannibilize sales if the market doesn't want it?

Your claim is that whatever is on the market at any given time is exactly what customers want, and that's just absurd. I don't know if you believe that's true for all industries, all companies, or if Apple just has a remarkable ability that every other company lacks. Either way, you are incorrect.
Because some people would buy the SE if it existed in a new format (of course) but Apple has to ask, how many of those would also buy the iPhone Xr or the iPhone 8 or the iPhone 7? If the answer is 75%, they might not bother updating the SE because of business reasons.
[doublepost=1536851458][/doublepost]
Appeasing the budget demographic is not one of Apple's strengths.

For Apple, it's quite simply they value revenue and profit over the number of users. Otherwise, they would've taken a hit to acquire more users in that demographic. It's also going to be hard for them to compete in that spectrum due to the amount of competition compared to the higher end tiers.
Why should it be? Apple makes money on what they sell, so they aren't going to appease anyone by lowering margins. It's a winning strategy too. I think you're agreeing.
 
The Mac Mini update is a joke. Still no upgradability, heat management or real improvement.
Oh, but it does come with a brand new jumbo price tag now.
Just sell the OS so we can load it on our own custom built machines Apple. Your in-house ones are just sad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soi Dog
Every keynote introduction from Apple is a wishy-washy story about how the iPhone or Watch or 'X' has 'changed everything'.
It's a good history lesson when a revolutionary product comes out, but otherwise, it's become a stale routine.

Really stale - I honestly have trouble watching/listening to parts of the keynote.
Tim is awful at doing them, even after all these tries at it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.