@ryanayr if you reply to this post, please answer the questions this time versus diverting.
In the case that you recommending that I selectively read, does that mean that applies to you when you don't answer any questions that are asked of you in the previous post? It's rather ironic, but no, I actually did respond all your points in separate sub points.
Touch ID could have a future, so I'm not sure why you're even commenting on that. Apples choosing not to give it a future based on their new premise with Face ID. Why do you keep resorting to having touch ID on the power button? It sounds like you're just not agreeing with the fact that you don't like Face ID altogether, so you're using your own narrative to formulate something that you don't know that was a possibility with the iPhone or not. Regardless, it's irrelevant, Apple chose not to go this route, so I'm not sure why you're debating something that's not a reality. But You're certainly entitled to believe something that will never happen.
You're Also asking me what's the difference between the home button and power button. In the case the touch ID, it's not a matter of differences, it's a matter of they chose not to utilize that specific option. Period.
Wrong. This is patently false and highly inaccurate. Stop insinuating things I never said. Apple directly themselves said Face ID is their future, I never said Face ID is better than Touch ID. Face ID personally is their future, however iterating what Apple said. If you want to confirm what they said that, watch the 2017 September keynote. That was quoted directly on stage Face ID is their future. . Which it seems that you are the one that is selectively reading and generating your own statements out of context.
You're not disagreeing with me, you're disagreeing with Apple. And addressing your point number 2, what does that even mean question "Something useful"? Something useful doesn't explain anything and that's not much of an argument. What else are you suggesting that would be more useful in place of Face ID in the sensors. What exactly would make it cheaper if the notch wasn't there? So where do you propose Apple puts all the sensors currently?
It seems you have more anecdotal pros that don't really make any sense at all. I'm not sure where you're even going with some of these points. You may not agree with the Notch, but some of your ideas add up to absolutely nothing.
So you're basically saying Craig Federighi and Dan Riccio are lying about everything with the open interviews about Face ID and the Notch? Is there any factual evidence that you can prove that the lying? Or are you just simply imposing your own viewpoint because you don't agree with the Face ID? Do they owe anybody an explanation about anything? Apple is secretive company as it is, they don't have to discuss that topic if you don't want to. They did so, because they want to explain the technology behind it and they openly answered questions from other consumers. I Don't have a reason to believe that any of Apples senior staff have a reason to lie, especially given that the openly discussed this new technology with other media outlets. It's Just you don't agree with what they're saying altogether.
And what "Flaws" are you referring to? They experimented with touch ID under the display, but they never stated it failed. It's been reiterated to you twice now, touch ID under the display never failed or had any flaws based on their experimentation, they abandoned it when they realized It was the primary choice.
No, I'm not naïve or an employee for Apple, I'm simply somebody has researched and followed this company very closely based on this technology. I would suggest you do the same Before making ignorant comments that are irrelevant and false. I'm not convinced that you read that article altogether, because if you had, then you would retract some of the statements in your previous post that are not true at all.
