No, you didn't. You failed to answer at least seven different questions posed to you. Keep deflecting. Personally, most of what you reply is drivel and has nothing to do with what I asked of you or is simply your own assertions.
Again, for a third time, the power button has nothing to do with this. Apple chose otherwise with Face ID. You keep resorting to these alternative locations for a Touch ID. It doesn't matter, it's not a reality, even if you want to to be.
Why are you even bringing other companies into this? Who cares. Apple chose to abandon Touch ID, contrary your own disbelief, they don't feel the it was necessary to include anymore.
If you watched the Keynote, then you also would have known Apple said Face ID is their future versus you questioning why I said that. Which indicates you're not paying attention or reading thoroughly enough.
This Post in general is a complete catastrophe in general. Honestly, a lot of what you're posting Is not even related or even on topic to what I was referring to earlier. You're simply way off topic. It's not about flaws, it's about the reality of what Face ID is and you simply keep conflating or posting your own theories that have no relevance to the actual thread.
And no, I never called anyone a liar. Again, you're posting false equivalency's to something that's not true. What you stated earlier was inaccurate, which I corrected you on. If you would read my post more clearly, please revisit the prior post to understand more thoroughly.
Read the bolded. Again, more frivolous arguments. Why does someone have to ask Apple who designed Face ID? Do you contribute to their research and development? You simply can't accept Touch ID is gone and you're taking the word 'compromise' out of context.
What does the cost of Face ID compared to Touch ID have anything to do with the last four posts? You're adding your own off topic ideations that have no prior relation to this discussion.
False. I provided direct links from verified Apple sources. Keep generating farces. It's not fooling anyone in this thread clearly.
No, it hasn't. You want to keep defying others views and opinions by making silly arguments that I believe some of the material you simply cannot grasp or you don't want to understand it. A tech forum doesn't represent the majority. But you being dismissive of all the presented sources provided, you respond with nothingness and you refuse or choose to not answer the questions. Truthfully, I don't believe you even have an idea of your own flawed logic in your posts.
Ending this discussion For obvious reasons.
[doublepost=1512870472][/doublepost]
"Better" is subjective. You don't speak for everyone, nor are you the vocal for everyone else outside a tech forum.
I will end this as well but will clear on few points...
You keep repeating that I am deflecting your posts by not answering them, from what I understood is that you prefer someone to spell out each point. I have said it before that my posts are condensed, so if you re-read, you will see I have answered them all. I am not going to repeat myself.
Again for the second time, I have explained that I understand Face ID is the future but Touch ID could be implemented, so why reply to that paragraph? I am not sure what you are trying to achieve? Why I bring other companies? This thread is comparing other companies biometric recognition. I wanted to point out that if Apple could have done it, we would have seen Touch ID on the X - I literally have to spell everything out to you, it’s just unbelievable.
My paragraph is a complete catastrophe? You wanted specific when I said flaws. Well, that paragraph relates to my second paragraph above (spelled out again) regarding finger sensor under the screen. You write lovely words but shows you don’t fully grasp anything others say and like a parrot have a script in hand. What part of by not admitting you did not understand? Or what do you understand, and then I will help you understand.
The cost does matter, and when I said it, you should be thinking - oh he is referring to the cost of the phone £1k. Again I have to spell it out.
Verified by who? And even you reply, which you won’t, can you tell me for certain that what they say is the absolute fact? You’re just not happy about the fly comment.
False? but you have twisted my words, if anyone reads our conversation can clearly see that you were trying to discredit my posts. You write a lot words, which can help someone with insomnia to sleep.
I am not defying others views, I actually welcome it. Please do tell. All I have read is people repeating what tech reviewers and Apple have said. When I challenge them, they can not justify any of it or provide their own opinion. For a second I think am talking to bots/employees - sensitive bunch. I never said iPhone X is bad, all I am saying it could be better and given my reasons. You have went off topic by taking this way too personally, I thought we could have had decent debate but how wrong was I...let’s agree on disagree.
[doublepost=1512909648][/doublepost]
Did you even read this link you provided or was this the first thing you Googled? It's drafted from Digitimes and has no validation without Apple specifying any actual sales numbers. Furthermore, what does this have to do with Face ID directly? Even the article says the information may not be factual.
lol I knew you would reply to that, you seem to like links. I have read. I know that but what I am trying to point out that here everyone’s response well I am the minority because the sales are off the roof etc but we don’t know if it is true. Hence why I posted that link. Let’s not assume anything. I just think differently
