Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wonderful, a phone where:

  • all apps crash 10 seconds after being opened
  • privacy is an optional install
  • privacy settings are automatically unset with each new version
  • anti-ad software will be required to prevent annoying ads in Facebook
  • anti-virus software is required
  • big brother is watching, and there's no $250,000 winner's prize
 
Wonderful, a phone where:

  • all apps crash 10 seconds after being opened
  • privacy is an optional install
  • privacy settings are automatically unset with each new version
  • anti-ad software will be required to prevent annoying ads in Facebook
  • anti-virus software is required
  • big brother is watching, and there's no $250,000 winner's prize

You left out that they will change the UI every few months
 
it wont be a phone tho ... FB is gonna launch their own android launcher like Sense

That I can see being alot smarter than a phone. I think that could take off if done right.
But im not sure they are as smart as you.
 
Why is every smartphone released these days considered to be an "iPhone competitor"? I rarely see stories on these tech blogs where phones are competitors to anything else except the iPhone.
 
Target market: Dumb Brits

I spend a considerable amount of time travelling about the UK (and last year, the US), and the sort of people who read MacRumors are so different (that's a compliment) to those who populate a lot of the UK, that they will not comprehend who Facebook appeals to and is used by. If you want an idea, visit any British town centre on a Friday or Saturday night, and you'll see a large quantity of overweight or strangely dressed, not particularly healthy looking females, Blackberry or budget Samsung phone in one hand, checking their whatever it is they check despite being in the presence of real people, prior to getting plastered. And so on.

Such a phone will sell in vast quantities to that demographic, whilst the rest of us exist in a parallel universe, developing technology and services that will help us escape this sorry mess.

If those in the US wonder what on Earth I am on about, come visit, but wrap up well, bring a lot of money (our prices are high due to lack of sustainable energy sources, unlike Germany), and buy a return ticket, because other than our old middle class villages and northern towns, the country is a ***** hole thanks to Facebook and the damage it does to young people and their ability to behave in a constructive honorable fashion.

Long live the SMART phone and it's user.
 
Most of my friends only use their smart-phones to call each other and to use Facebook, so an Android based device with deep Facebook integration will be a hit on the markets in many less developed countries.

Facebook fr one has a much better game center than iOS

For one, I am glad HTC is doing it. They really make good phones.
 
The more companies that enter the smart phone market and better for Apple at this point. Now you have sea of Android based phones but still only one iPhone that stands alone. Apples only challenge in this game is to not end up like BlackBerry and allow competition to get so far ahead you look old and worn out. Ideally, Apple will step it up and start out pacing the competition once again. Hard to do though when it's 100 against 1.

But I'd rather be Apple than RIM or Microsoft... two platforms that appear to be orphaned and doomed out of the gate.
 
People are already becoming restless and wanting to leave. The only reason people are still on Facebook is because everyone else is a member. This would have sold a ton around 2008-2009.

With such a credible, in-depth analysis of a large social network I can only assume you're one of these analysts we often hear from in other MacRumors articles.
 
If you dont like facebook, dont sign up. What have you all got to hide anyway?

If you want to put all your personal crap out there for all the world to see, track, monitor, make money off of and otherwise use in ways that you currently don't know about and ways that have yet to be invented, well, that's your business. But the cop-logic that those who don't must have something to hide is monstrous.

There's a reason sites like Facebook are "opt-in" not "opt-out", and it's the same reason houses don't come with glass walls by default, with the optional non-glass variety being only for those who have something to hide.

It's called privacy. If you're confused, it's in the dictionary.
 
I'm likely a bit older than most of you, so I'll hold out for the Zork Phone...
 
it's not incorrect, b/c that is what Google indirectly does. their very nature of existing is to acquire information about you via mechanisms such as Gmail, Google+, Google Calendar, and all of the other apps and services they provide in the pull down menu list on the top of your Google Account.

they will not take specific content extracted from emails and attach it to your name and sell that as a data mining package. but what they do is extract, categorize, and sell a data analysis to advertisers as sales pitches of "why you should advertise with google" and offer specific tailored advertisement packages that allow companies to then acquire the data themselves via click-through ads and cookie tracking advertising

proclaiming Google's innocence in the debate of online privacy, is in effect ignoring the elephant in the room

They indirectly do it just like Apple and EVERY company that sells advertising does it.

And who is proclaiming Google's "innocence" - I merely commented that your statement that Apple is the only one that... was incorrect. And it is. Talk about ignoring white elephants.
 
because iAds isn't as successful as Apple wishes (dare I say a failure) they are the good guy in ads and leeching your data, duh
 
your defense of Google's advertising tactics has completely disintegrated.

move along now - there are other threads on this site for people like you

Again - where have I defended Google's advertising tactics? And no thanks - you aren't the arbiter of where I should and shouldn't post.

I guess it's projection. You've nothing further to add so laughably resort to playing moderator?

Is it that hard for you to admit that all companies that sell advertising mine customer data? And that your original assertion was FUD? It is. I get it.

I'm not moving on from this thread. Just you :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.