Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don’t care about default sms app. What I would want is for the share button to open up to all messenger apps. Today the top row is populated with frequent iMessage contacts, but I do a lot of messaging in other apps. If that top row is populated by most frequent contacts/groups regardless of messaging platform I would be content.
I’ve seen facebook messenger contacts in that row.
 
In many Asian countries, with large populations of poverty, Facebook has struck deals with mobile operators to give Facebook "for free" when purchasing mobile data. Now Facebook is "the only way to communicate" for many of these families. They don't even consider other options because Facebook is seen as an all-you-can-eat buffet that is "free". Meanwhile, these consumers' information is being sold to the highest bidder.

Facebook can go suck on a digital lemon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Also, unlike E-mail clients and web browsers, you don't generally click on a "messaging link" (like a URL or an E-mail address) to message someone, so there's no real benefit to being the "default" messaging app on a device. I use Telegram, Microsoft Teams and iMessage and none of them feel more "default" than any other.
Generally, what I was going to say. Except for SMS/MMS, there's no standard messaging protocol that I know of, at least that has stood the test of time in popularity. Not even iMessage is standard. As mentioned, there's no URL/URI for every message client. Basically, even if Apple isn't opposed, a default messenger isn't a thing anyway. 🤦‍♂️

EDIT: Or what he said...
It's a ridiculous idea.
There are internet standards for email and web-browsing. For example, if you send an email to someone, their servers will get it, all you need is an email client. So, allowing one email client to be default over another makes a lot of sense. Web-browsing -- you need to render the links, and allow people to execute those links.

But there is no "standard" messaging system. FB Messenger is one, iMessage is another, Signal is yet another. None of them interoperate. It's unfortunate, but they don't. You can't just switch to "FB Messenger" and get the same messages as you did before. (like you would switching email clients). It doesn't work that way. So, if Zuck wants to put in the work, and create a whole new messaging standard, promote it, and get buy-in from various parties, etc. then maybe he'd have a case.

Also, Zuck is smart enough to know all this. So, I declare shenanigans on this whole idea as just some dumb political ploy by Zuck to make Apple look like a bad guy for not offering something that doesn't even make technical sense.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
I don’t see why not (other than Facebook being evil etc). The only times I “use” iMessage is to get two factor authentication codes. Otherwise it’s 100% messenger, WhatsApp and telegram.
That’s not even iMessage, that’s SMS in the iMessage client.
 
I've got nothing good to say about Messenger, and iMessage is light years ahead of anything out there.
not even close. Telegram is even more light years ahead of iMessage. The fact I can reply to certain message, edit, delete (for all parties involved), self destructive messages (I think a few messaging apps have this, but not iMessage), and more in Telegram shows how behind iMessage is. Heck, I was able to pin messages at the top in Telegram for a while, as long as I can remember. Group messages is also 100 times better in Telegram than iMessage.
All Apple has to do is open iMessage to other platforms and they can instantly crush everything else out there.
See the person I quoted below. Sadly WhatsApp is the most popular messaging app out there. People aren’t going to drop what they have because something else came out.
They should lobby for the other messaging app that is the de facto standard everywhere but US, whatsapp.
people in the US don’t realize barely anyone outside the US uses iMessage.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: otternonsense
I don't use Facebook anymore, but I had somebody contact me needing programming assistance and we needed to chat with Facebook Messenger since that is what she used. So I downloaded it on my phone. At the time, I had the limited data plan. A WEEK LATER, I got notices that I was approaching my 3GB limit for the month (I don't do much, I download music and stuff off WiFi and just use it locally when away from the house). The same thing happened the next month. And we did not send THAT many messages. Yet it just ate up my data. So once we were done I deleted the app and never received another warning about usage again.
 
I’ve seen facebook messenger contacts in that row.
Interesting. I don’t use Facebook Messenger very much but use another few messenger apps quite a bit including WhatsApp and and one or two others and I only see iMessage chats there.
 
I will forgo customizability if it means privacy is intact.

That’s why we use, and have used, Apple products for a long time. The slogan is “think different” (or was) and in this case: think differently about how you use vs customize your tech vs. giving corporations your data.

Like you said: there is a choice. That choice for you seems to be Android if you need customizability that results in breaking security and sale of your data.

If you don’t like iOS: don’t use it.
If you don’t like Android: don’t use it.
If you don’t like macOS: don’t use it.
If you don’t like Windows: don’t use it.
If you don’t like Ubuntu: don’t use it.

Many of the same people saying this is a ridiculous idea/should never be allowed were probably the same that wanted a different default Mail app.

You can not use Facebook. You can think it's a privacy threat to you. All of these are choices. And for some people, they use Facebook Messenger more than SMS/iMessage. That's a choice, too.

I don't know why people are so happy to want their devices to be less customizable, especially as it relates to another company they don't like. Don't use Messenger? Great! But when you want more customizations for your iOS device, just remember that other people want similar things too.

Granted, I'm not arguing that this choice is good - for starters, I don't even know how it'd functionally replace Messages due to the different protocols used. I am however arguing this from a larger perspective - that customizations to the device that don't globally impact users shouldn't be shunned.
 
browsers and email clients (for the most part) run on web standards and are interoperable. No one wants to give SMS data access to Facebook. That is a clear privacy danger. In Asia I think no one uses iMessages anyway. If you can open an app to send messages and make calls and the system lets you integrate your app with Siri, is a default necessary?

LOL Facebook.
 
not even close. Telegram is even more light years ahead of iMessage. The fact I can reply to certain message, edit, delete (for all parties involved), self destructive messages (I think a few messaging apps have this, but not iMessage), and more in Telegram shows how behind iMessage is. Heck, I was able to pin messages at the top in Telegram for a while, as long as I can remember. Group messages is also 100 times better in Telegram than iMessage.

See the person I quoted below. Sadly WhatsApp is the most popular messaging app out there. People aren’t going to drop what they have because something else came out.

people in the US don’t realize barely anyone outside the US uses iMessage.
don't get me wrong, I use Telegram as well. A necessary evil in the crypto world. But it is a cest pit, way to easy to scam anyone and pretend to be someone you are not. The funniest were those pretending to be me, a bunch of muppets. But also the number of people setting up an account, putting some vile messages out of there, and then burning it.

It simply isn't secure, it is just a messaging service with all of its flaws. Nothing special and should never in its current form be allowed to cater for official communication.

On another note, as some have already highlighted. It is a pointless argument. Facebook messenger is already the default for Facebook messenger messages ;)
 
I want iMessage as my default message App. If Messenger is added in a future iOS version then I will change default message App to iMessage, delete Messenger then log into my iTunes account and hide that App. I will then send a iMessage to my family warning them to do the same to protect their privacy.
 
I don’t care about default sms app. What I would want is for the share button to open up to all messenger apps. Today the top row is populated with frequent iMessage contacts, but I do a lot of messaging in other apps. If that top row is populated by most frequent contacts/groups regardless of messaging platform I would be content.

This isn’t Apple’s fault. WhatsApp already has this feature, FB Messenger just hasn’t implemented it yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cybbe and cyb3rdud3
FU Facebook. Whatever else you thought about FB - how they have destroyed viral content so they can make more money for example - it's now worse than ever before.

I just got a 24h ban for a comment saying "I'll beat u up :) :) " (with the smileys) or something like that - which was a pun on the original post - a joke.

FB AI police took it as a threat and banned me for 24h from commenting. I appealed of course, because it wasn't a violent threat, it was a joke based on the OP which contained the same sentence. But they have no time now to manually review, or maybe all the real people working there have already left Facebook which wouldn't surprise me either.

I know they're already censoring messenger content too - don't think you can just send messages. You can only send messages when FB artificial intelligence approves.

What sort of messaging platform is that? Well - it's not. Just not.

I've switched to Telegram - since Whatsapp is also controlled by the Molocch.
 
I am for a much looser app store policy - Apple shouid not decide what I can and cannot see.

But if they're gonna ban anything, ban Facebook, for excessive censorship. Just ban them. And YouTube too. All of these clowns. Let's use alternate platforms that don't censor us. Freedom of speech is the 2nd amendment. Platforms that actively violate this should be banned.
 
They'll never get my vote on that and if it ever gets allowed - they'll never get me set it up as default. I'm using it less and less as it is.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.