This should surprise no one as this is the FB mantra. Them saying they've stopped doing it is like a liar saying they'll only tell the truth. I simply don't believe anything FB says as their core competency is to lie.
This should surprise no one as this is the FB mantra. Them saying they've stopped doing it is like a liar saying they'll only tell the truth. I simply don't believe anything FB says as their core competency is to lie.
If I had to guess, it is because you are using a Facebook app on Facebook servers with other Facebook users who all agreed (whether they read it or not) with the Facebook terms of service.How does this not violate wiretapping laws?
FB has gotta be the largest slow motion train wreck in history. Not a week goes by without this company fending of another new outrageous scandal.
I’ve had a lot of replies that are a variation on this - I think y’all are bad at reading.Voice Chat is pure voice. No text conversion is involved.
For Speech-to-Text, all platforms offer APIs for that. There is no need for Facebook to collect their own dataset. But if they want to monetarize this data...
Fine, but they should tell users they're collecting the audio. The audio doesn't even need to leave the device to transcribe it, but if they want to do that, it'd still be ok if they weren't storing and disclosing it.This is the only known way to make speech to text more accurate...
I’ve had a lot of replies that are a variation on this - I think y’all are bad at reading.
“Facebook says that users who had voice chats transcribed had opted in”
This is a feature that people TURNED ON to transcribe their voice into text before sending it, like if you used Siri to send a text message.
They say that they don't (correct me if I'm wrong), so if you're telling the truth, you're risking getting fired and worse... so I doubt what you say.Apple does it to, I run two divisions that do this.
At no point did I trust Facebook wasn't collecting my audio. The thing is, I don't care, and precisely all of my friends use it (though some, like me, have fake names).Who uses Messenger, anyway?
It is still a thing?
Just say No to any FB-related app.
And <delete>.
The s*** hit he fan? No, people already know what FB does and will continue using it.
This is the only known way to make speech to text more accurate...
It no longer bothers me that these money greedy unethical companies hoard and mine personal lives,
That part that bothers me is that people do not care, they will still use their products...
True. It is likely that medical transcriptionists have been around so long that people accept it and know it’s a person. For good or ill, eventually people will become familiar with this as well.That's what I've heard too. My understanding is in the old days you had a central facility with security and transcriptionists weren't allowed to take in pens and paper to prevent note taking. Now they've got work-at-home which is near impossible to secure.
But overall the concept is the same: a human listening to private information and typing it in. Nobody has evidence that Facebook or Apple was hacked here, people just feel icky about the idea of a random person listening to their private info, and that idea is very similar to medical transcribing.
They say that they don't (correct me if I'm wrong), so if you're telling the truth, you're risking getting fired and worse... so I doubt what you say.
More creepier as opposed of creepier?Facebook getting more creepier everyday
Right, you do.Apple does it to, I run two divisions that do this.
Wait till the media finds out about medical transcriptionists...
Because fundamentally modern "AI" (machine learning) requires a ton of data. It doesn't work like a human where you just need to find a small mistake, it requires tens of thousands of mistakes to make it learn correctly.
https://xkcd.com/1838/