Wouldn't blame them! I would love to go back to pre-iOS 7 design. I'm kinda hoping that they bring back skeuomorphismAnything to avoid iOS7 I guess. 🤣
I have to ask, in all seriousness, "why do you care"? I mean, absolutely no one would be disappointed if YOU stumbled on an extra $60K.I was hoping the money would be given to a charity, but it looks like it isn't the case. That's a shame.
Its amazing that it was sold at the unsubsidized price and required one of these with a two year contract:The $599 cost of that phone in 2007 is about $870 today. It's not clear unless I missed it though. In 2007 phones were heavily subsidized by cellular providers, at least here in the US. Was $599 an unsubsidized price?
It's crazy how the plans were before with the minutes. I'm from Nicaragua and the pre-paid per text charge is crazy, that's why we use WhatsApp and Facebook MessengerWe thought it was a good deal!
Its amazing that it was sold at the unsubsidized price and required one of these with a two year contract:
(Anytime minutes/Night and weekend)
– $59.99 (450/5000) or
– $79.99 for (900/Unlimited) or
– $99.99 for (1350/Unlimited)
All plans include:
- unlimited 2.5G EDGE data
- Rollover minutes to the next month
- Unlimited AT&T to AT&T mobile calling
- 200 SMS
- Visual Voicemail
Need more SMS?
- Unlimited SMS - $20
- 1500 - $15
- $.20 pay per use
There was no MMS/picture messaging/iMessage.
There was no way to purchase Music wirelessly, no app store, etc….
One could argue spending $1000+ on a phone in 2023 is a waste of money.Look, I don't know this guy's financial situation and if this helps him, great. But it just seems crazy to me that people would spend this much on an object that will probably just sit on a shelf or something, it just seems like a waste of money.
Correct. Among all the innovations of the iPhone, Jobs wanted to get rid of the subsidy system. Original iPhones only sold for full retail price with no subsidies. Apple quickly backtracked on this and signed subsidy agreements with AT&T, and eventually, others.The $599 cost of that phone in 2007 is about $870 today. It's not clear unless I missed it though. In 2007 phones were heavily subsidized by cellular providers, at least here in the US. Was $599 an unsubsidized price?
Nope. No subsidies were offered for the original iPhone. Full retail price only.The $599 price required a 2 year AT&T contract. AT&T was typically giving $150 discounts for phones purchased with a 2 year contract so without the contract, the price would've presumably been $749.
Nobody has done it though, and doesn't look like they will. This is such a popular scam schemeRun it through an x-ray.
Welcome to the world of collecting. people buy cars and barely drive them - look at teh number of 10 year+ cars on auction sites with less than 10k miles on them, or comic books carefully stored in special sleeves, etc.Look, I don't know this guy's financial situation and if this helps him, great. But it just seems crazy to me that people would spend this much on an object that will probably just sit on a shelf or something, it just seems like a waste of money.
Hind sight is 20/20, right? We all would have stocked up on those bad boys had we known they’d sell for $60,000 nowadays.
There was no subsidized iPhones at launch. it was staggering to think people would pay $600 for a phone when all phones were subsidized (free with 2 yr contract) in the U.S.
The first iPhone wasn’t subsidized by AT&T. The first iPhone to be subsidized was the iPhone 3G.
Yes the first year was unsubsidized. That’s why Steve Ballmer was recorded laughing at the iPhone. He was like, we have $99 phones running our software.
Nope. No subsidies were offered for the original iPhone. Full retail price only.
Ballmer was Gates’ business guy, much like Tim Cook was to Jobs.There has been at least one comment in this thread about Steve Ballmer's reaction to the original iPhone. He did get the point about the price correct as iPhone prices ended up being quickly lowered $200 less than three months after launch.
Below is a video.