Its crazy to see in this poor economy that people have this much disposable income
My thought exactly, is ‘t the battery gonna be swollen?I want to know if it will turn on.
I also want to know if the battery will have leaked everywhere, if not.
I worked the launch of the original iPhone and if my memory serves, it was AT&T only and wasn’t subsidized, which was a big deal at the time. The subsidies with 2-year contract came later.The $599 cost of that phone in 2007 is about $870 today. It's not clear unless I missed it though. In 2007 phones were heavily subsidized by cellular providers, at least here in the US. Was $599 an unsubsidized price?
I want to know if it will turn on.
I also want to know if the battery will have leaked everywhere, if not.
Watches are a good investment like that. If you bought even the $260 Omega Swatch and haven't unpacked it, two months later it sells for $1000. Last time I checked 50th Moon Landing anniversary Omega Speedmaster nearly doubled in value in 4 years from it's original $9k. And if you can go into $100k+ range the returns can be even better....but that means you would buy stuff and never take it out of its original packaging.
Because it was more expensive than those other devices to subsidize. When they finally did subsidize it, it strained their margins so they didn’t make a profit on the sales for years considering they had to buy the phones upfront from Apple. But they gained a lot more customers… which strained the networks instead lol.Since AT&T was typically discounting other phones $150 with 2 year contract, wouldn't similar have been true with the iPhone since it required a 2 year contract i.e., actual price of 8GB iPhone was $749 but sold for $599 with 2 year contract (before the $200 price reduction less than three months later).
Why wouldn't AT&T have given customers contract discounts on the original iPhone just as they had been on other phones at the time?
Ballmer was Gates’ business guy, much like Tim Cook was to Jobs.
If you want to see the future of Apple under Cook, look at how Ballmer ran Microsoft: grew the valuation and stock price rose, while product innovation and quality lagged.
My thought exactly, is ‘t the battery gonna be swollen?
$50 says the battery has expanded and the front glass has popped off.
Because it was more expensive than those other devices to subsidize. When they finally did subsidize it, it strained their margins so they didn’t make a profit on the sales for years considering they had to buy the phones upfront from Apple. But they gained a lot more customers… which strained the networks instead lol.
AT&T (then Cingular) was willing to give Apple much more freedom on the software side (zero bloatware) than other manufacturers due to the power of the Apple brand, but they probably weren’t willing to spend the money to bet on this new, unproven device and Apple also didn’t agree to sell to them upfront either.
Seems cheap compared to a Mac Pro!
Perhaps but not really relevant as the buyer likely doesn't have any intention of even opening the box. The value here is in the fact that it's an unopened original iPhone and opening the box and trying to use it would eliminate 99% of the value.
It's similar to buying a 50 year old classic car with 12 miles on it. Actually driving the car and putting miles on it can greatly reduce its value.
$599 on a two year contract.
The price of cell phone plans included the price of the phone, so the original iPhone cost much more than $599.
That really should be pointed out so people these days don’t think it was $599 outright.
Which by my calculation of later phones ($650 unlocked or $200 on 2 year contract), the original phone was $1049.