it's a nothing burger, move along nothing to see but fake drama.Anyone care to explain what this is about?
it's a nothing burger, move along nothing to see but fake drama.Anyone care to explain what this is about?
She told him, which is the actual leak, and he reported it on Twitter. So from this perspective he’s clean.
Yeah, but there's a difference between disseminating info from public sources as rumors and conjecture vs taking actual info as an employee that you signed paper work agreeing to not do those things and disseminating that info out. Things he could have been gleaning documents that have terms like "Apple Confidential", "Apple Top Secret", "Apple Classified" on the documents he may have gotten this info from. Conjecture on my part ofc on where and how he got the info. But most places with IP on documents have such classifications of secrecy and non-disclosure on them.Pointing at nobody in particular but there is some stark hypocrisy on this thread. A select few criticising this guy for what he has done yet we are on a site that relishes in rumours and leaks. We all discuss this sort of thing and it drives discussion pre release on so many products. I think some of the folks taking pleasure in this going Pete Tong for this guy need to assess what they’ve been discussing on here in the past before taking the moral high ground now.
Apple's not going to gain anything from suing them. this will most likely be the end of it.(Note: I'm not a lawyer. I do not have any privileged information about Apple or its employee practices.)
I doubt the leaker is "clean" and immune to legal action from Apple. First, it is very likely, given how deeply embedded secrecy, compartmentalization, and control over information are encoded into Apple's corporate DNA, Apple employees are subject to a comprehensive and far-reaching non-disclosure agreement. Second, as a possible analog, many prosecutions for insider trading in stocks and other financial instruments involve both the leaker and the recipient of information.
Apple's not going to gain anything from suing them. this will most likely be the end of it.
Yeah, but there's a difference between disseminating info from public sources as rumors and conjecture vs taking actual info as an employee that you signed paper work agreeing to not do those things and disseminating that info out. Things he could have been gleaning documents that have terms like "Apple Confidential", "Apple Top Secret", "Apple Classified" on the documents he may have gotten this info from. Conjecture on my part ofc on where and how he got the info. But most places with IP on documents have such classifications of secrecy and non-disclosure on them.
I’m aware of all that being a designer myself, but there are certain Chinese leakers who get applauded and these people have gotten their info from people just like the OP. I would never leak the information I work with and have signed NDA’s with many car manufacturers in my time, just pointing out how hypocritical it is of people to judge here when their threads have been received with open arms in the past.
Agreed! This was a wild story. Sucked for the dad, he seemed like a very nice/humble person.after the iPhone X guy got fired (who was pretty high ranking, if you don't recall the specifics) I'm shocked anyone at Apple says anything to family about new products. It sucks not being able to discuss your job like its military secrets but at the end of the day, if you want to work at Apple you have to play by their rules.
This. This x 1000.I marvel at the carelessness, and casual cluelessness - the sheer self-centred immaturity and utter self-absorption - of many who live their lives online, who behave and blunder and post material with a complete lack of thought or care (or responsibility) for the privacy (personal and professional) of others, who are blithely unconcerned and uncomprehending about the effects of this possible lack of privacy (until this bites them when they are identified and fired or fined, or pursued through the courts), and all of this in a world primed to react to, and reward - with notice, and lots of attention - instant news, irrespective of whether it is true or false.
Honestly, I don’t really give a crap about rumors and leaks. Arguing for two weeks on what’s a possible change in a button? I truly don’t care. The “rumors” part is probably the least compelling part of this website, and I am sure many other users share my sentiment.Pointing at nobody in particular but there is some stark hypocrisy on this thread. A select few criticising this guy for what he has done yet we are on a site that relishes in rumours and leaks. We all discuss this sort of thing and it drives discussion pre release on so many products. I think some of the folks taking pleasure in this going Pete Tong for this guy need to assess what they’ve been discussing on here in the past before taking the moral high ground now.
I am here for the forums, not for the news. That's it.Honestly, I don’t really give a crap about rumors and leaks. Arguing for two weeks on what’s a possible change in a button? I truly don’t care. The “rumors” part is probably the least compelling part of this website, and I am sure many other users share my sentiment.
Same. I am interested in some kind of news, namely the intersection between politics and tech, and the intersection between lifestyle and tech. Other than that, the only thing I truly care about is the forums.I am here for the forums, not for the news. That's it.
I think it is funny the OP's actions are being criticized on a site devoted to rumors and leaks about Apple. Having said that, I wouldn't be surprised if the OP's "confession" is an attempt to cover her or his tracks or if the OP themselves was an Apple employee or contractor and the actual source of the information.
Honestly, I don’t really give a crap about rumors and leaks. Arguing for two weeks on what’s a possible change in a button? I truly don’t care. The “rumors” part is probably the least compelling part of this website, and I am sure many other users share my sentiment.
Sure we do, I simply don’t subscribe to the automatism according to which if I am on MR it’s because of rumors.I’m sure we are here for a multitude of reasons.
Yeah, but there's a difference between disseminating info from public sources as rumors and conjecture vs taking actual info as an employee that you signed paper work agreeing to not do those things and disseminating that info out. Things he could have been gleaning documents that have terms like "Apple Confidential", "Apple Top Secret", "Apple Classified" on the documents he may have gotten this info from. Conjecture on my part ofc on where and how he got the info. But most places with IP on documents have such classifications of secrecy and non-disclosure on them.