Whatsapp = Facebook. You're not getting any extra privacy there. Probably less in fact.
That's what I mean. Hey FBI, go after the easier targets for the info you want.
Whatsapp = Facebook. You're not getting any extra privacy there. Probably less in fact.
I’m on the other side.
this argument that if you have nothing to hide just give law enforcement access is how police states get enabled.
I’ll happily provide access to my phone for example. Once I get an authentic official & duly executed search warrant from a judge & justice system I trust.
This is why you should keep the USB Accessories settings off.
In regards to the "If you've done nothing wrong, then you have nothing to hide," crowd, I may not have much to hide, but I don't want to advertise what I do have, either.
A lot of people want Apple to tighten up security.
okay. Let some catastrophe happen to you or your family done by some POS dirt bag and the answer to said calamity is sitting inside their iPhone. You would be rioting for Apple to give the fbi a backdoor access to that phone, so stop it. It’s not a problem because it’s not happening to you.
Would YOU want the "authorities" to know what is on that phone to prevent the attack from occurring?
Similar to what I posted on reddit the other day about this same topic.
The government would like to have the data off the POS's phone who shot up the naval base in Pensacola.
And now we have people whining about privacy. Well, I'm all for privacy. But I ask this: suppose the POS in Pensacola had on his phone, communications with a sleeper cell here in the U.S. which showed the next attack and when and where it would happen. Said attack would be similar in scope to 9/11. Would YOU want the "authorities" to know what is on that phone to prevent the attack from occurring?
What? Trump and Barr lying as if the truth has no meaning? Can it possibly be?
Yeah, sounds about right.
Similar to what I posted on reddit the other day about this same topic.
The government would like to have the data off the POS's phone who shot up the naval base in Pensacola.
And now we have people whining about privacy. Well, I'm all for privacy. But I ask this: suppose the POS in Pensacola had on his phone, communications with a sleeper cell here in the U.S. which showed the next attack and when and where it would happen. Said attack would be similar in scope to 9/11. Would YOU want the "authorities" to know what is on that phone to prevent the attack from occurring?
What a slippery slope this is. That said, no one, not even the... ahem... President, is above the law*.
Once a warrant is issued, the individual should be compelled to open up their device.
If a device had only biometrics as an unlocking feature, this would be easy...
* Your mileage may vary when it comes to Presidents/Politicians/#the rich.
I believe that the SCOTUS ruled that no one can be compelled to unlock their phone, and using their biometrics if they are passed out, or dead, is definitely illegal, or something to that effect. What's to stop a cop from knocking someone out (killing them?), and using their finger print to incriminate them. It's illegal search and seizure.
Guys, this is NOT about the morality behind wanting a known criminal brought to justice.
This is about asking your house builder, not YOU, to give the government (who have historically F-ed particular groups of people over on a CONSISTENT basis) a copy of the keys to YOUR and EVERYBODY ELSE's house, because your neighbor did something wrong and he doesn't want to let the cops in.
FOCUS on the ISSUE, folks.
SEE through the rhetoric and partisan, conservative vs. liberal bull droppings.
The answer to this is simple: HELL NO.
Like they did last time..Hopefully Apple will patch this shortly and render that box useless.
In the US every citizen breaks 7 laws a day on average. It only matters if you become famous or if someone decides they need to get you for political reasons. Then we all have something to hide. But the presumption when discussing laws is that we are all guilty of one of the millions of laws we have and act accordingly.In regards to the "If you've done nothing wrong, then you have nothing to hide," crowd, I may not have much to hide, but I don't want to advertise what I do have, either.
Cool! Maybe that’s how we can get a new iPhone SE!
A lot of people want Apple to tighten up security.
okay. Let some catastrophe happen to you or your family done by some POS dirt bag and the answer to said calamity is sitting inside their iPhone. You would be rioting for Apple to give the fbi a backdoor access to that phone, so stop it. It’s not a problem because it’s not happening to you.
Equally casts doubts on claims Apple cannot do it.
[automerge]1579204907[/automerge]
In the US every citizen breaks 7 laws a day on average. It only matters if you become famous or if someone decides they need to get you for political reasons. Then we all have something to hide. But the presumption when discussing laws is that we are all guilty of one of the millions of laws we have and act accordingly.
And I’d love to be a fly on the wall when one of the pro-surveillance proponents gets THIER life hacked in the name of national security. See how they like the taste of them apples. Something tells me the flavour will suddenly become quite sour.
How do you think these repair shops recover your data? What? Who?I hope criminals get caught.
I hope Apple wins this privacy battle.
I thought GreyKey didn’t work past iOS 11. Must be new and improved. I shouldn’t be surprised. The cat and mouse game continues.
Lock down? You mean create an unhackable, unbreakable operating system? For the first time in history? Hope away, pal.
How do you think these repair shops recover your data? What? Who?