Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's all good and fine and it should be activated if there is no tradeoff. But it seems to me the whole point of radio apps is that it lets you listen to stations around the world, not just in a 30 mile radius of you.
Some people like their local talk stations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesPDX
Why not allow both. Consumer choice. If the hardware is there...! I had no idea.
It is true that the WiFi/Bluetooth modules in current iPhones generally have an FM Receiver section in them, too. However, I would suspect that the Antenna pins are NOT connected to anything, and doing so would require a redesign of the iPhone, since antennas for the 100 MHz FM broadcast band are on the order of 31 inches long. And now that we are not having a traditional 3.5 mm headphone jack and headset (the wires for which typically are used for FM antennas), I'm not so sure it would be a snap to incorporate that functionality into a current iPhone design.

Not everything is fixable with a Firmware update. Sorry.
 
I smell another FCC spectrum auction coming...

There's an auction going on right now, but it doesn't as of yet affect FM radio. However there is a proposed plan to expand FM radio in the US to the channel 6 frequency just below FM, but no FCC decision has been made and probably won't until the "Repacking" of the TV band in the US to just channels 2-36 (2-6 being the least desirable for TV). TV channels 38-51 are being sold to the cell phone companies. ATSC 3.0 however should technically allow most any cell phone to receive TV along with FM radio.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesPDX
Apple's not going to do it because it'll allow you to listen to radio for free, rather than having to pay them for a monthly subscription.
That can't be the main issue. Or an issue at all. I suspect it is tied to the antenna issues and the issues of FM radio signal interference. And when iPods first started and then morphed and eventually we got Phones with true, robust multimedia capabilities no ones saying "If ONLY I could get crappy FM radio THEN this would be worth it." At least no one I ever met read or heard from. FM radio reception wasn't at the top of my list. If you think about it, what the iPod did originally was release us from listening to radio and still having a huge amount of music to listen when and how we wanted. Hearing ads in-between a few songs we might like was what we were getting away from.
 
The chip is there, but it still needs to be wired up to an antenna. If the antenna pins aren't hooked up to anything, that's a no go, even if there is FM support by the wireless chipset being used. And I suspect they aren't. And since antenna length is based on the frequencies you are operating at, it's unlikely that the antennas used for 700Mhz+ are going to be all that great for 80-100Mhz frequencies (plus the transmission part might throw a wrench into it, my RF is a bit rusty).

They could have it hooked up to the headphone jack and do FM that way, but when I tried that with an iPod Nano a few years ago, it was a sort of "it works, but isn't great" answer.
Yah but no. FM radio should be banned, since it's been taken over by monopoly radio corporations, pushing out the same 40-year old classic rock stations and bits and pieces of repetitive and overly loud commercial pop in between blocks of advertisement.

The only reason Ajit Pai wants to enable this is so that his right-wing corporate radio buddies can force more of their garbage down people's throats.

Pull the plug on FM radio already. Its time has passed.
Boy am I glad YOU aren't FCC Chairman!

Ever heard of the First Amendment?

Ever heard of CHOICE?
[doublepost=1487283102][/doublepost]
Yes, 100% correct, but you know how millenials get offended when a feature is added that is not targeted exactly to their own personal needs :)

But I do kinda feel old because I remember when the biggest feature request for the iPod was an FM tuner. Heh.
Didn't they do that on one (and only one) version of the iPod?
 
So let me get this straight, the guy has a penchant for destroying Net Neutrality but when it comes to playing "consumer advocate" for a split second, of all the random things he decides to champion, he wants to activate FM radio on phones that technically support it via their chipsets but which don't actually have the required antenna to pick up a signal. How does this make any sense?
Exactly!
[doublepost=1487283297][/doublepost]
Yeah, IIRC, it was one of the iPod nanos that had it. I don't think the regular iPod ever did though - at least that I remember.
That's what I was remembering, too; that it was a Nano.
 
AM? That band that only makes weird noises? You gotta be kidding..... Nobody ever listens to AM, only for nautical purposes and other strange stuff.
Nobody uses FM anymore. The streaming industry took music over. The only thing the radio is used for is sports and talk, which are dominated by AM waves.
 
Apple's not going to do it because it'll allow you to listen to radio for free, rather than having to pay them for a monthly subscription.

just get over it already with the conspiracy whining. apple is a company. they are not hydra.
 
But it does use up battery life. listening to FM for long periods would be the same battery drain as being on the phone talking that entire time.

Listening to FM radio would obviously use up battery power, however it should use much less power than if you were streaming that same radio station over a WiFi or 3G/LTE using an app like IHeartRadio.

I would love to see FM radio included, just to offer another option, and to take away a reason that could potentially push people over to a different phone (seems like the majority of Android phones offer it).
 
  • Like
Reactions: zauriel
Right-wing radio talk shows never took off on podcasts and live streams. They still linger on AM stations, farting out nonsense and conservative conspiracy theories. Giving these bottom feeders' bad ideas a way to pollute modern devices is a bad idea.

...but that isn't what this story is about.
 
LOL, what makes you think you HAVE to listen to the radio if it's an option?

This is like a lot of you iPhone users complaining about the 3.5mm headphone jack being useless only when Apple got rid of it despite the fact that it was never a bother and all of you had wireless headphone options via bluetooth ANYWAY.
The 3.5 mm jack was never a problem... until your iPhone fell into the toilet.
[doublepost=1487285788][/doublepost]So when are we going to find out that our new FCC Chairman has a stake in the NextRadio App?

http://nextradioapp.com/

Think about it. With Trump's cabinet (and Trump himself) and all their various "business interests", I wouldn't at ALL be surprised...
 
So how else would this allow a user to be tracked?

I don't for one minute believe this new FCC is on the side of the consumer.
Tinfoil hats get your tinfoil hats here!

---------

Can't believe people here are fighting against having an extra feature. Weird times we live in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zauriel
Boy am I glad YOU aren't FCC Chairman!

Ever heard of the First Amendment?

Ever heard of CHOICE?
Ever heard of obsolescence?

Nostalgia isn't a business model. You're on an Apple board. That means everyone likes to get rid of old technology around here, because Apple likes to get rid of old tech.

You need to learn to get rid of old tech, instead of being nostalgic.
 
FM Radio is 10 mins. of music, 30 mins. of ads, no thanks.
uhm, how often do you travel outside the US? Would be great to listen to radio there and get music and news without blowing through expensive data plans. they also have a much better ratio of advertisement and content.
 
Tinfoil hats get your tinfoil hats here!

---------

Can't believe people here are fighting against having an extra feature. Weird times we live in.

Yeah lets just ignore the reality of the world we live in already.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.