Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Everything should be free

I cannot believe that Apple would charge for a beta. They are selling out for sure, and leading others to do the same. In fact, I downloaded a so called "trial" version for 30 days. THIRTY DAYS! I used it for free and discovered it was so helpful that I became actually quite dependent upon it. I use it all the time now, and have important documents that are now in that format. Alas, the 30 days are up and I either lose all that data and functionality or cough up the bucks. All this is Apple's fault. I am now dependent upon this software and have to pay. It is not fair.

Sounds like drug dealers to me.

All things from Apple should be free and then we would have world peace. Everyone should keep whining -- louder

see 'ya
 
I don't think it will be compatible with VISTA.
Why not?

...Actually, Vista is already compatible with Boot Camp. Many of us are using the Vista Beta on our Macs with very few problems (considering both pieces of software are still beta releases).

I'm absolutely sure those problems will be worked out and Vista will be fully supported in Leopard (or for $30, Tiger).
 
One more reason for me not to boot Windows on my Mac(like I need any more:rolleyes: )



But in allm truth I'll get 10.5, and I'll never use bootcamp!
 
Will the new BootCamp release eliminate the need for a reboot when switching operating systems? (a la Parallels) If that's the case, I wouldn't mind dishing out the 30 dollars.
 
Will you be able to use Vista with Boot Camp?

Yeah, I currently have Windows Vista RC2 running on a slave drive that I boot into by holding down the OPTION key during boot. Works like a charm (use it for AutoCAD 2007).
 
Since when have people paid for driver software? Apple is using this to get more people to switch to 10.5. Careful Apple, you are turning into Microsoft.

Hey, if it offers something more than the drivers and the re-partitioning tool, it seems like it could be worth thr $30! (e.g. the oft rumored Fast OS Switching).

B
 
Apple has made many comments about how they feel boot camp is the best solution and virtualization is not viable for them. Besides when you have Parallels and VMware etc. I think they would rather leave those headaches to other companies, there isn't a need for them to fill and with the new parallels beta to be able to run off of a bootcamp partition I wouldn't be surprised if apple wasn't helping them with some things behind the scenes.
 
bootcamp + vista

yes it works, i have it installed on my macbook. you need the latest bootcamp and when the instructions ask you to put in the windows xp cd and reboot, place your release version vista cd in and reboot. no funny steps required like some of the guys were posting back in the vista beta days, i've had no problems installing whatsoever.

vmware works fine with vista as well. the only problem i see is that 32 bit vista gets installed for vmware. could it be that mac os x 10.4 is not 64 bit?
 
I can't remember or not, and if I'm wrong, please correct me.....but when Tiger came out in April '05, wasn't it $129 even on the EDU discount for a while? I know it's $69 now, but wasn't it $129 for a while?

I don't think so... I'm pretty sure I got my at the Penn Computer Connection for $69 just a couple days after it was released.
 
Well, I have no issues with Apple charging for Boot Camp. But... Funny thing is that I had a full-featured OS and more apps I couls shake a stick at, and it cost me exactly zero dollars. So your comments about how charging for monmey is basically a requirement, is 100% crap.

And what is that, Linux? Congrats, go find an open source version of bootcamp and use that, or program it yourself. Or perhaps you were implying that you pirated OSX?

No, software doesn't necessarily cost any money to develop. What if I were a developer and I decided to create a piece of software for the pure enjoyment of creating that software?

Wrong. Dead wrong. Software dev cost money. Time is money, work is money, and any of those software developers could be making *more* money if they sold their work instead of handing it out for free. However that is the beauty of open source software, it is often times developed by many different software engineers, over a long period of time. The cost to the individual may not be that great, and the volunteer effort is much appreciated. But the net value is still the same.

Like it or not, there are about zillion developer giving you "their hard work" for free. Hey guess what? Apple got Safari's rendering-engine for exactly zero dollars as well! As it happened, KHTML's developers though that they have no need to ask for money for their software? Firefox is free as well.

And news flash, Safari is free!! Apple developers who go to work every day to bring home money for their family end up working on a free product. I'm sure they enjoy the fact that Apple pays their checks from funds from other sources of revenue.

In fact modern programming languages are built on "free" code. Entire libraries of pre written code exist in order to save the modern developer coding time. I can write what would be highly complex programs with a few lines of code thanks to the extensive C++/Java/C# libraries. Every other modern high level language I'm aware of has similar libraries.

This does not negate the fact that a person spends their time creating a work (improved upon a base or not) and compensation is sometimes helpful.

OS X's BSD-groundwork was also free for Apple. As is the OpenLDAP they use, and Apache. They are all free. For some reason their developers felt that they have no need to charge money.

See above.

There are two different paths for software, Open Source or Company product. One is generally free, the other is generally not. Perhaps one day all software will be open source and free, and in my spare time I'll dev software for the fun of it. But when that day comes I'll be out of a day to day job, and will have to go to work as a carpenter or something, and only code in my free time. Personally I quite enjoy getting paid to code, and I also like dinking around in my spare time on side projects.

Apple can not hand out all software for free. There is a breaking point where the time and energy spent on all software dev must be recuperated at least in part. Apple is a business, with stock holders and a goal. 1 infinite look is not a gathering of people who all go into a building every day in order to work for free.

Personally I'm ecstatic that Apple releases all the software they do for the total cost that they do. OSX is is an amazing project that despite having open source aspects is still an accomplishment that I don't think you comprehend. Past that there is ongoing support that is "free" through updates and tech.
If I pulled off making OSX I'd charge more than $130, personally. And screw discounts. On top of that I probably wouldn't allow you to bother me for help getting it to work, especially not for free, or pennies.

But if you dislike companies selling products, by all means find an open source solution or make it yourself. And if their exists a specialized product that is beyond the open source community or your own skill to deliver in the time frame you need it, than pay the company that did.

Apple is fully justified in charging for it's products, even if it's not what you want. Would I like it for free? Of course. But am I willing to pay for the hard work another human being put into it? Yes, because it's worth it to me (or would be if I could find a company willing to give me an Intel Mac for free, maybe I'll complain about that...).

To be grateful a product is free is one thing. To whine moan and complain because a product cost money is just beyond me.:(

~Tyler
 
Any excuse t odefend apple any reason to hate on microsoft.
Is like computers are turning into digital religions.
Where 1 group sees apple as "GOD" the other group sees microsoft as
the "DEVIL" when in fact their both 1 in the same.

Charge for boot camp? Charge for Draft-N when is not the end users fault?
wow

So many excuses t odefend aplpe bu tat the end of the day your being sucked into apples
business tactics. You will see give it another 10+ years and ALL OF YOU WILL ADORE LINUX OR MICROSOFT MORE.

Apple ended up being the opposite of what it portrayed. Their whole strcture is based on free codes but yet
they charge for their mistakes and mishaps. They are charging us for their mistakes how funny is that

Outside of asking you to think before you post, or at least turn on OSX's auto check spell, I have just a few questions...

What product, free or otherwise, is it that that you buy that is free of any defect now or in the future? Because you seem to be holding Apple to some standard of perfection that someone else accomplishes here on Earth that makes Apple immoral for holding to.

Even your life wasn't free or without error. If you are unsure of this, ask your mom and an english prof.
 
Well been running Vista on my Imac 23' for months now not really had any problems. Only installed it so I could play with my xbox 360 hd drive and enjoy some hi def films on the nice 23' imac display (since at present apple software doesnt support the playback of this type of movie and the imac is in my bedroom so it's easy to connect it)
See no great trauma paying for bootcamp final release since it was beta software, dont really understand complaints regarding this. In fact since I will no doubt be buying the new osx and it comes free with that it's a added incentive to buy the upgrade, Hopefully by then there will be support for hd dvd playback anyway and I can bin VISTA altogether anyway so it's all bonuses from my point of view.
It's also worth noting Apple are a business and not some evangelical software company trying to save the world by giving away free software lol.
 
It's also worth noting Apple are a business and not some evangelical software company trying to save the world by giving away free software lol.

I'm replying mostly so people read your comment again. I think that is where a few people on the boards here have lost their way. That, or they are pre working world and don't understand the basic business world.
 
To all the whiners:

Go buy a PC. Then you dont even NEED bootcamp! And, you will save time but not needing to post (whine) on this forum.




***
Seriously,
Apple will sell what, 20 copies of Bootcamp? Everyone will be running Leopard by Fall 07 when Bootcamp expires. And, even at $30, its a bargain to be able to run Windows on a Mac at full speed, something unheard of just over a year ago.

The irony is if Apple charged us $30 for the Beta from the beginning, we would have all purchased it for that price and been happy as ever with the new functionality it offered.
 
nickel and diming us to death?

hey, i love my three apple computers and will surely upgrade to leopard, BUT i dont like ONE BIT that apple now thinks they have to nickel and dime us to death! what next? pay $1.99 for each incremental upgrade from now on? a yearly 'maintenance' charge? that apple is not run by mother theresa's is becoming more apparent, did you know that apple insisted on copy protection for itunes songs even when the artist/label did not?!

a piece of good advice, steve, don't fix something thats not broken.....
 
BootCamp = $30.
Leopard = $69

BootCamp = Allows you to dual boot Windows on a Mac.
Leopard = A heck of a lot more and BootCamp. Entire Operating System. More expensive, but way better value.

I'm buying Leopard.
 
I think I'll save my $30. I know it means I won't be able to boot into Windows, but I'm pretty sure I'll be able to survive with just OSX.

:D
 
Final bootcamp version = good.
Bootcamp seen by Apple to be worth $30 = great.
Said Great Bootcamp version included in Leopard which everyone should buy = fantastic! :)
 
Here are a number of points:

-Apple is not charging for Boot Camp Beta, they are charging for Boot Camp Final for Tiger.

-Apple could have released Boot Camp for free with purchase of Leopard and left Tiger users in the dust, is $30 for legacy software that big of a deal when you could have had nothing instead?

-This is not a new process. iChat AV for Jaguar cost $30. Like Boot Camp, it was made clear that the BETA software would expire and the final version would be available for purchase with Panther (Leopard) or standalone.

-This process is completely different than the Wireless N issue. Don't even try to compare it.
 
I cannot believe that Apple would charge for a beta. They are selling out for sure, and leading others to do the same. In fact, I downloaded a so called "trial" version for 30 days. THIRTY DAYS! I used it for free and discovered it was so helpful that I became actually quite dependent upon it. I use it all the time now, and have important documents that are now in that format. Alas, the 30 days are up and I either lose all that data and functionality or cough up the bucks. All this is Apple's fault. I am now dependent upon this software and have to pay. It is not fair.

Sounds like drug dealers to me.

All things from Apple should be free and then we would have world peace. Everyone should keep whining -- louder

see 'ya

Are you BLEEPing retarded????????? I mean seriously????

You're clearly NOT talking about BootCamp, since it isn't 30 days. In that case, you are a MORON because any Apple trial software you downloaded was titled exactly that, TRIAL! Why do you think they make trial software???? The whole point is to get people hooked on a good program, and give people a chance to try it out.

Everyone quit b*tching, and if you're going to do it, know what you're talking about.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.