Actually Final Touch 2k was $25k before Apple purchased Silicon Color and rebranded FT as Color."....that it took Apple four years to go from v1.0 to v2.0 of Color (which is ridiculous)."
3 years ago, Color was a $22,000 piece of software! Are you kidding me? Why has everyone assumed that this is such a let-down? Let's wait for real world experience.
Waiting for this to show up on torrents![]()
Man this is just what I feared no Snow Leopard improvements.
...
This just seems the same no 64-bit, no grand central, no open CL.
Waiting for this to show up on torrents![]()
People who steal it are easy to spot because they don't have any of the media that comes w/it and sometimes they don't even have all of the apps in the suite.Do people really try to torrent this thing?
In the comment box when I see it:
"It doesnt have the content disc, can you post that that too."
"Damn its big, need more seeders."
What are some of the bugs left in Color?...After two years all Color basically gets is some of it's many show-stopping bugs fixed, really? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad they fixed what they fixed but this type of stuff should've been fixed long ago in point updates not all saved up to be part of the FCS suite upgrade...
From what I've read Color still has a problem w/PAL footage, interlaced footage, mixed format timelines, and mixed frame rate timelines. Until Color gets out there though we won't know how well Apple fixed what they said they fixed and what other bugs still remain.What are some of the bugs left in Color?
(I don't use the app myself, but might like to once I have a better idea of how to do the more the basic color correction within FCP and a proper CC setup.)
Apple laughs at the idea of backwards compatibility. Heck, sometimes it's problematic just getting older FCP projects to open on newer versions of the software.How backwards compatible is this new version of FCS?
Apple laughs at the idea of backwards compatibility. Heck, sometimes it's problematic just getting older FCP projects to open on newer versions of the software.
Lethal
People who steal it are easy to spot because they don't have any of the media that comes w/it and sometimes they don't even have all of the apps in the suite.
Lethal
People who steal it are easy to spot because they don't have any of the media that comes w/it and sometimes they don't even have all of the apps in the suite.
Lethal
You'd be surprised how many professionals, and companies, pirate software.Those who bt this, don't work professionally with it. Any self-respecting pro will buy a copy since they use it to make money, and can even write it off taxes.
One thing I love about the internet-age is the classic hypothetical question, "What would you do if you knew you'd never get caught?" isn't hypothetical anymore.Those who bt it, and are not pros - well, they don't make money on it, so... meh.
If Apple didn't care the software wouldn't ship w/unique serial numbers and it wouldn't be network aware. And piracy w/in bounds? Lemme know when that happens.Do you imagine Apple cares? I seriously doubt it. Piracy - within bounds - is advantageous to some software companies.
Interesting application.From what I've read Color still has a problem w/PAL footage, interlaced footage, mixed format timelines, and mixed frame rate timelines...
One other thought: from the pictures, the retail box looks smaller, as if they ditched the printed "bibles." No biggie, just an observation. PDFs are fine and well....portable.
My hunch here is that, because FCP 7 is still limited to using 2 cores for RT, and because editing with native AVCHD is so processor intensive, Apple decided to continue to require transcoding AVCHD to ProRes/AIC in order to prevent frequent crashing....
Some oddities:
1. They added native AVC Intra support, but AVCHD is still a transcode. Not that this directly affects me, but I can imagine other people aren't happy...