I do respect your opinion & did not mean to intimate otherwise...
Thanks for that.
I even can agree with you in SOME instances. For example: when I read a report that one lady that called the fire department because her Samsung phone lit on fire on her nightstand actually called them again a week later for another fire starting from that same outlet, I immediately judged that the outlet was the issue, NOT the phone, & it seemed like the woman was a bit attention hungry.
Interesting story indeed!
However, certainly you must agree that it would be highly, highly, highly unlikely that anyone could use of the methods you mentioned of faking a battery issue, & time it so that it would go off while they're on a plane, to get attention- yet before it took off so they don't end up being the murderer of several hundred people.
C'mon... you simply MUST admit that is a hard sell!!! What if their calculations were off by a tiny fraction??
Also, nobody would put a phone they KNEW was going to explode in their pocket.... at the very least he would've made a big show about putting in in his carry on, while announcing what he was doing, if he was attention seeking.
Your scenario is nonsensical for the airplane incident, & I'm afraid that I'm going to have stand by that.
The point of the training I was able to sit in on (no I am not law enforcement, nor am I insurance, I assisted in filming) was in regards to methods to create trigger-able cascade reactions that resulted in either destruction of the device, or, personal property. The main goal being how to look for evidence of such tampering after a meltdown. Despite the intent being for people to learn how to discover such minuscule traces of evidence, more of us came away shocked as to how easy it is to cause one of these 'accidents'. It is actually not that difficult to cause a phone to melt down, or to trigger it in a controlled method at the time of the users choosing. Quite honestly, if you know how to replace the screen or battery in a modern iPhone, you possess the technical skills (with some further direction) to do it yourself. Once one of these methods is implemented all you need to do is give the phone a heavy squeeze (sometimes cracking the screen) and wait for the reaction to cascade.
Do I think it is outside the realm of possibility for someone to put such a device into their pocket knowing it may catch fire at any time? Absolutely not. Just search "Personal Injury Insurance fraud" within your favorite search engine. It is amazing what lengths some people go to, or what they risk to get Money, attention, or whatever they are after.
All of that said, Additional facts released by the Verge after I originally read it (before it was posted here) have made me slightly less suspicious of
this case overall. At the time the news initially broke, there was no note of the phone being left with the airline (The thought escaped me that, yeah, this is a secure area, why wouldn't they keep it), Samsung having been contacted, or that arson investigators being involved. Generally speaking, I am not a conspiracy theorist, but the original story lacked some key details as to the current status / whereabouts of the phone.
I still maintain that it would be a good idea for all Airlines to equip all of their jets with fire resistant smolder bags. I have been amazed how well they contain a battery meltdown, and feel it is a good added level of safety.