And it does it with the same number of cores as A13, or half the cores of A12Z.No one is talking about the other geekbench Benchmark.
In Metal compute, the A14 gets a 70% improvement over the A13. It’s even better than the iPad Pro
And it does it with the same number of cores as A13, or half the cores of A12Z.No one is talking about the other geekbench Benchmark.
In Metal compute, the A14 gets a 70% improvement over the A13. It’s even better than the iPad Pro
it is a strange number, but we see the same on the iPhone 11 Pro“3.66GB of memory “
that seems like a very strange figure
Personally, I consider 3 GB RAM the new entry level for RAM, meaning us geeks may want more.
Metal compute benchmark evaluates the GPU cores mainly, supposedly.And it does it with the same number of cores as A13, or half the cores of A12Z.
No one is talking about the other geekbench Benchmark.
In Metal compute, the A14 gets a 70% improvement over the A13. It’s even better than the iPad Pro
Yes. I'm talking about GPU cores of course.Metal compute benchmark evaluates the GPU cores mainly, supposedly.
Those are all quite old now.<iPhone 6s and SE, iPod Touch and iPad Mini looking over the fence>
“Hey man, we’re still here.”
It’s the geekbench GPU compute benchmark... It can be "used" in any number of scenarios, from video editing to games, from augmented reality to AICan you translate this into a real-world use case? Sample app?
It's not really. The total is actually 4 GB of physical memory on-board, but not all is visible to Geekbench.“3.66GB of memory “
that seems like a very strange figure
The first turbo switch I remember were on some Samsung PC clones with an 80286. Probably around 1988, it was 6MHz normal speed and 8MHz turbo.
The 8MHz turbo would sometimes cause crashes with certain programs—looking at you MS Flight Simulator 2—so we’d have to switch it to 6 sometimes. I don’t think it could be switched on the fly; iirc, you had to reboot it.
(We ran Digital Research’s GEM OS at the time, a Mac-like GUI that ran on top of MS-DOS. Mostly we used GEM Draw and Xerox’s Ventura Publisher, a surprisingly powerful WYSIWYG desktop publishing program.)
yes.Do we assume that the A14 fitted in the iPhone 12 will have to run slower than the A14 in the iPad.
Simply due to a MUCH larger battery in the iPad and vastly more space for cooling?
NoDo we assume that the A14 fitted in the iPhone 12 will have to run slower than the A14 in the iPad.
Simply due to a MUCH larger battery in the iPad and vastly more space for cooling?
we should expect it to run a bit slower in multicore. With the A12 it was 12% slower, though with A14 might not be as much if the processor efficiency improved a lot.Do we assume that the A14 fitted in the iPhone 12 will have to run slower than the A14 in the iPad.
Simply due to a MUCH larger battery in the iPad and vastly more space for cooling?
iPhone A12 is not 12% slower than iPad A12.we should expect it to run a bit slower in multicore. With the A12 it was 12% slower, though with A14 might not be as much if the processor efficiency improved a lot.
The iPad Air with A12 has a 12% higher multicore score in geekbench 5 than the iPhone XS with A12iPhone A12 is not 12% slower than iPad A12.
iPhone A12 is not 12% slower than iPad A12.
True. 2832 vs. 2497 are actually 13%. The Internet regrets the error.
I think the GPU performance is going to surprise a lot of people.And it does it with the same number of cores as A13, or half the cores of A12Z.
It has been true historically, so you can expect it. Generally not a huge amount, though.Do we assume that the A14 fitted in the iPhone 12 will have to run slower than the A14 in the iPad.
Simply due to a MUCH larger battery in the iPad and vastly more space for cooling?
well... that actually gives that the iPhone "A12" is 12% slower than iPad "A12": 12% slower, 13% faster![]()
True. 2832 vs. 2497 are actually 13%. The Internet regrets the error.
The iPad Air with A12 has a 12% higher multicore score in geekbench 5 than the iPhone XS with A12
You don’t pick some random test which you don’t have any idea how it was done, under unknown thermal conditions. You pick the average score for the device. Those aren’t the average scores for the devices.View attachment 962906
iPhone XS - Geekbench
Benchmark results for an iPhone XS with an Apple A12 Bionic processor.browser.geekbench.com
View attachment 962907
iPad Air (3rd generation) - Geekbench
Benchmark results for an iPad Air (3rd generation) with an Apple A12 Bionic processor.browser.geekbench.com
I was just making a joke, pointing out that it would be 13% faster means 12% slowerI was agreeing with you. Just saying that it's 13%, not 12%.
No, you should never pick the average scores listed on Geekbench's list. That's exactly why your claim is false.You don’t pick some random test which you don’t have any idea how it was done, under unknown thermal conditions. You pick the average score for the device. Those aren’t the average scores for the devices.