Why is everyone so hyped about these? The Earpod design is one of the least comfortable earbud designs. I have $10 earbuds that are more comfortable than the Earpods.
Which 10 dollar earbuds are you using?
Why is everyone so hyped about these? The Earpod design is one of the least comfortable earbud designs. I have $10 earbuds that are more comfortable than the Earpods.
No, you're probably right. They'll just flog them like the dead horses they are despite dismal sales, just as they've done with those unloved $80 in-ear buds.You think apple is going to toss in $159 earbuds?
And how much are the "similar" models?
It's just the standard length oneDoes that look like a 2 meter lightning cable to anyone else? That would be a nice edition although I imagine it will probably just be the standard length one.
Don't forget the absolutely classic submerge!But where's the drop/scratch/bend/incinerate test videos???!
Why is everyone so hyped about these? The Earpod design is one of the least comfortable earbud designs. I have $10 earbuds that are more comfortable than the Earpods.
Cable not fitting into box = design crap.
Do I see USB-A only? Com'on Apple, if you play your (very unwise, to put it diplomatically) games with connectors, at least be so polite to your customers that you provide cables compatible with all your bloody products!
If you have a new MacBook you probably have either a USB-C Lightning cable, a USB-A/C adapter, or a drawer full of USB-A charger blocks.
The cable for the iPhone, Apple Watch, and wired EarPods don't fit inside their respective products, either. I'd rather keep the carry case small enough that I can easily carry it in my pocket.
If Apple included a USB-C to Lightning cable then 95% of people would HAVE to run out and buy a USB-A to Lightning cable or repurpose one that they already have.
By including a USB-A to Lightning cable basically 100% of people can use it out of the box. If you have a new MacBook you probably have either a USB-C Lightning cable, a USB-A/C adapter, or a drawer full of USB-A charger blocks.
The cable for the iPhone, Apple Watch, and wired EarPods don't fit inside their respective products, either. I'd rather keep the carry case small enough that I can easily carry it in my pocket.
If Apple included a USB-C to Lightning cable then 95% of people would HAVE to run out and buy a USB-A to Lightning cable or repurpose one that they already have.
By including a USB-A to Lightning cable basically 100% of people can use it out of the box. If you have a new MacBook you probably have either a USB-C Lightning cable, a USB-A/C adapter, or a drawer full of USB-A charger blocks.
Can they not provide both?
No, you're probably right. They'll just flog them like the dead horses they are despite dismal sales, just as they've done with those unloved $80 in-ear buds.
Sure, the competition will be more expensive but the vast majority of people who will pay 150 for these, won't blink at dropping 250 or even 300 for pods with much better audio, design, battery performance etc.
And add $25 to the cost of the product and create more e-waste? I'd prefer they went the other route - slash $25 off the cost and tell people "charge cable not included because we don't know which one you need".
Two per customer.I wonder how many the stores are letting you buy? I would buy every last one if they would let me tomorrow.
Do you think those cables cost anywhere close to $25 to manufacture?![]()
The wired earbuds that come with the Apple devices are NOT FREE. The cost is built into the price. Just like the cost of the apple applications that ship with Macintosh computers. Companies, especially apple, do nothing for free.
C’mon earth!!! move faster round that damn sun!
No, but it's a $20 to $25 loss in revenue because the customer isn't spending the money on the cable. Well, slightly less because some customers will share with their iPhone cable and some will get third party. But there is a profit reduction to Apple for including a cable.