No, that argument has been debunked. Apple are just being cheap and screwing us over...end of!Agreed. It may also be a supply chain consideration. It may be easier to source a single 256GB module than two 128GB modules.
No, that argument has been debunked. Apple are just being cheap and screwing us over...end of!Agreed. It may also be a supply chain consideration. It may be easier to source a single 256GB module than two 128GB modules.
Can you source claim?No, that argument has been debunked. Apple are just being cheap and screwing us over...end of!
No, that argument has been debunked. Apple are just being cheap and screwing us over...end of!
this is an example of the camera+sensor assembly from one of the MacBooks. Not sure which one but it is typical. They are not as small as you imagine.How do you know they can’t have a 1080p camera with a smaller bezel? Do you have the data sheet for the camera they use and data sheets for comparative devices?
I’ve installed macOS through several different methods over the years.
DVDs, USB, creating a clone, recovery mode…
It all of those methods it’s never taken more than an hour, and on average barely takes a half hour.
And I’ve installed every version since 10.6, with the exception of 10.8.
They’ve all on average taken between 20 and 35 minutes to install.
Hold on now, we’ve been over this. When using the Windows Media Creation Tool, how long does it take to download and create the flash drive? At least an hour.I just reverted from Monterey back to Big Sur and the whole process from downloading 12.4GB Big Sur, creating the USB install media, erasing storage, installing Big Sur to booting to desktop took several hours and not 35 minutes. Creating Big Sur USB install media alone without counting the time to download took 40 minutes. For comparison, writing a 5GB Windows 10/11 ISO takes 3 minutes plus like 15 minutes to install it and boot to desktop. Anyhow, the point is M1 256GB is already slow to reimage/boot/launch apps/etc. so Apple needs to make M2 256GB faster and not slower.
Wrong, it's called cheapening out and screwing over customers which only dumb evil companies do!Why is replacing 2 128 modules with 1 256 module cheating out? It’s called streamlining supply chain and every smart business will do so
See Max Tech YT vid on the M2 MacBook Pro and the fan is awful as is the machine. It runs dangerously hot and the fan hardly kicks in and when it does it hardly spins up and shows once again how useless Cook is as CEO regarding products.I think most of us are waiting to see the difference between M2 w/ a fan and M2 w/out a fan.
This machine would be an excellent replacement for my Intel 16” MBP minus the infrequent times where I would need sustained performance. Looking forward to the verdict after in depth tests are run.
The point is not if people notice the difference but the fact we should not be charged for performance promised that we do not get and then have to pay even more just to get half decent performance.nowhere did I say anything about manufacturing process - if I do not have to source 128GB modules across my lineup and just get 256 - that is streamlining supply chain.
Of course here at MR we look at benchmarks and every single bit and everything gets taken apart. 90+ % of Apple users can care less. For a MBA entry level config, the average user will not notice whether a file loads 1 sec faster or not, overall performance impact is not going to be noticeable for the average user. Those average users are not upgrading from M1 to M2, they are upgrading from older laptops or they are new to Apple.
This is what the Apple apologists refuse to accept which is that Tim Cook is a money guy and is deeply cheap and miserly.Maybe you should watch the Apple "dog-and-pony" shows where Tim and Co. literally stand on stage grandstanding how their new generation hardware is faster than anything before and all the great things you can do in less time! But you're saying people don't care or won't notice the increase in performance? Who's right then? You or Tim and Co?
The point is, there are empty solder pads on the system board for another NAND chip. If 128 chips were in short supply (pure speculation and no one knows) then Apple could have made the base model 512GB and used two NAND chips to keep disk performance at expected levels. Apple's cost of another NAND chip, compared to the cost of the MBA is nothing (and yet Apple charges an extra $200 for that $10 or less chip). But then, they'd take a massive hit in profits from people who upgrade to 512GB (which is significant).
That's not the point. Point is being shafted whilst told everything is better and faster when it is not.Please stop making so much sense, what will the youtubers do now??
That was not the point. Point is Tim and Co tell us and you that the M2 machines will be better than the M1 etc and yet we now know that to be false with the 13" Pro at least.oh, yet another twist ... is a M2 MBA faster than a 2017 MBA? you bet, even the SSD benchmarks will be better, but you want to compare 2021 256 vs 2022 256, fine, have fun with that. Saying this agin now, target market for M2 MBA is NOT M1 MBA users, look at the bigger picture.
Well I am tech neutral and can tell you you must be doing something wrong as when I reinstall macOS it does not take that long, not even close.Just MacOS reinstall takes half a business day without restoring apps or data compared to Windows 10/11 that takes like 15 minutes.
I've seen your posting history that shows you're just fanboying and making apologies for one brand while I'm brand agnostic tech enthusiast so have experience with MacOS, Windows, Linux, BSD, ChromeOS, etc.
I used that method too and it took a lot less than half a day. Your doing something wrong or your machine is defective, I promise.Yes way. I'm using the USB restore method while you're probably thinking of Apple Configurator 2 that requires another Mac and skips the USB creation.
This is what the Apple apologists refuse to accept which is that Tim Cook is a money guy and is deeply cheap and miserly.
He does not care for the product like Steve Jobs did!
Steve fired a engineer for not caring about what font should be used on the iTunes store website, Cook only cares how much money he can empty from our pockets.
I have and it does not take that long, sorry but stop being so proud, you are wrong.You've never done it before so sit and learn.
Yes they are still manufactured, I just found the wholesale price and it is just over $2!Those small flash chips aren’t manufactured anymore, gee, maybe Apple knows better than you how big their market for 256 is and they are definitely serving a market.
And stop this BS about “future proofing”, if that is YOUR purpose then invest properly, entry level doesn’t serve that purpose
I reverted mine back to Mavericks and it STILL took less than half a day!Sometimes I have to revert back to Big Sur.
I restored mine back to Mavericks and it took a lot less than 4 hours and my Mac is over 6 years old!USB restore doesn't require internet. Nice try.
My 6+ year old Mac took a lot less than 4 hours and that went back to Mavericks so you are doing something wrong, sorry but you are!Which Mac and storage size are you referring to since they're different? I'm referring to M1 256GB and using this method with USB flash drive:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201372
I just deployed my Mavericks image to my 2011 Air this afternoon because I was bored and it took about 7 min.I restored mine back to Mavericks and it took a lot less than 4 hours and my Mac is over 6 years old!
Why don't you prove it to us since you are claiming it takes so long despite me telling you my situation was worse than yours and it took me less than 1.5 hours total and that included going back to Mavericks and then upgrading back to Big Sur!You're probably doing a reset rather than reinstall of MacOS. Anyhow, prove it. Start a video record from start to finish of creating USB bootable installer to reinstall of MacOS on M1 256GB using the method linked below.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201372
No offence but it is you who needs to learn as I told you before and I will keep telling you!Time to learn how to use Homebrew to get the native AS version...
https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/stockfish
However, hashcat might still be broken so you have to learn how to build it from source. Or, skip and play candy crush.
Actually they would know as it is their job to know such things.Apple Support wouldn't know this level of detail, only engineering, plus, its not even released, so they wouldn't answer such type questions ... show proof
see Max Tech on YT and they prove you wrong!“Significantly slower speeds…”.
This is some cringe hyperbole. In real world usage probably noticed by no one.