Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How do you know they can’t have a 1080p camera with a smaller bezel? Do you have the data sheet for the camera they use and data sheets for comparative devices?
this is an example of the camera+sensor assembly from one of the MacBooks. Not sure which one but it is typical. They are not as small as you imagine.


1657487753219.jpeg
 
I’ve installed macOS through several different methods over the years.
DVDs, USB, creating a clone, recovery mode…
It all of those methods it’s never taken more than an hour, and on average barely takes a half hour.
And I’ve installed every version since 10.6, with the exception of 10.8.
They’ve all on average taken between 20 and 35 minutes to install.

I just reverted from Monterey back to Big Sur and the whole process from downloading 12.4GB Big Sur, creating the USB install media, erasing storage, installing Big Sur to booting to desktop took several hours and not 35 minutes. Creating Big Sur USB install media alone without counting the time to download took 40 minutes. For comparison, writing a 5GB Windows 10/11 ISO takes 3 minutes plus 7 minutes (just wiped a device to measure time) to install and boot to desktop then several minutes more for updates. Anyhow, the point is M1 256GB is already slow to reimage/boot/launch apps/etc. so Apple needs to make M2 256GB faster and not slower.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: Romain_H
I just reverted from Monterey back to Big Sur and the whole process from downloading 12.4GB Big Sur, creating the USB install media, erasing storage, installing Big Sur to booting to desktop took several hours and not 35 minutes. Creating Big Sur USB install media alone without counting the time to download took 40 minutes. For comparison, writing a 5GB Windows 10/11 ISO takes 3 minutes plus like 15 minutes to install it and boot to desktop. Anyhow, the point is M1 256GB is already slow to reimage/boot/launch apps/etc. so Apple needs to make M2 256GB faster and not slower.
Hold on now, we’ve been over this. When using the Windows Media Creation Tool, how long does it take to download and create the flash drive? At least an hour.

Why in the world did you go out of your way to discuss download and imaging of the macOS drive and just skirt around already having the Windows ISO and clearly using a different utility that the official Microsoft one?

If you want anyone to take you seriously here at least do an actual Apples to Apples comparison.

It’s faster for me at work to fully image up a windows machine than a Mac….but not by more than half an hour or so.
 
Why is replacing 2 128 modules with 1 256 module cheating out? It’s called streamlining supply chain and every smart business will do so
Wrong, it's called cheapening out and screwing over customers which only dumb evil companies do!
Customers pay for the specs and speeds they are told they will get only for Apple to then deliver less.
This basically forces customers to pay more to get a machine with good enough specs and is clearly brazen attempt by Cook to squeeze as much money out of customers as possible with zero justification.
 
I think most of us are waiting to see the difference between M2 w/ a fan and M2 w/out a fan.

This machine would be an excellent replacement for my Intel 16” MBP minus the infrequent times where I would need sustained performance. Looking forward to the verdict after in depth tests are run.
See Max Tech YT vid on the M2 MacBook Pro and the fan is awful as is the machine. It runs dangerously hot and the fan hardly kicks in and when it does it hardly spins up and shows once again how useless Cook is as CEO regarding products.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Tagbert
nowhere did I say anything about manufacturing process - if I do not have to source 128GB modules across my lineup and just get 256 - that is streamlining supply chain.

Of course here at MR we look at benchmarks and every single bit and everything gets taken apart. 90+ % of Apple users can care less. For a MBA entry level config, the average user will not notice whether a file loads 1 sec faster or not, overall performance impact is not going to be noticeable for the average user. Those average users are not upgrading from M1 to M2, they are upgrading from older laptops or they are new to Apple.
The point is not if people notice the difference but the fact we should not be charged for performance promised that we do not get and then have to pay even more just to get half decent performance.
There is no justification for this and evidence shows Apple are being cheapskates, they even are reusing old M1 MacBook Pro 13" boxes.
How is that a result of supply issues?
How is that good business ?
That is like a cafe owner reusing a slice of tomato that a previous patron did not eat and calling it great business rather than cheap skating .
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: jz0309
Maybe you should watch the Apple "dog-and-pony" shows where Tim and Co. literally stand on stage grandstanding how their new generation hardware is faster than anything before and all the great things you can do in less time! But you're saying people don't care or won't notice the increase in performance? Who's right then? You or Tim and Co?

The point is, there are empty solder pads on the system board for another NAND chip. If 128 chips were in short supply (pure speculation and no one knows) then Apple could have made the base model 512GB and used two NAND chips to keep disk performance at expected levels. Apple's cost of another NAND chip, compared to the cost of the MBA is nothing (and yet Apple charges an extra $200 for that $10 or less chip). But then, they'd take a massive hit in profits from people who upgrade to 512GB (which is significant).
This is what the Apple apologists refuse to accept which is that Tim Cook is a money guy and is deeply cheap and miserly.
He does not care for the product like Steve Jobs did!

Steve fired a engineer for not caring about what font should be used on the iTunes store website, Cook only cares how much money he can empty from our pockets.
 
oh, yet another twist ... is a M2 MBA faster than a 2017 MBA? you bet, even the SSD benchmarks will be better, but you want to compare 2021 256 vs 2022 256, fine, have fun with that. Saying this agin now, target market for M2 MBA is NOT M1 MBA users, look at the bigger picture.
That was not the point. Point is Tim and Co tell us and you that the M2 machines will be better than the M1 etc and yet we now know that to be false with the 13" Pro at least.
So that blows your defence of them out the water, stop apologising for what is obviously a money grab and despicably so!
Cook is even reusing M1 boxes and putting a label over the M1 print.

How cheap and scummy can he get?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: mdsco221
Just MacOS reinstall takes half a business day without restoring apps or data compared to Windows 10/11 that takes like 15 minutes.

I've seen your posting history that shows you're just fanboying and making apologies for one brand while I'm brand agnostic tech enthusiast so have experience with MacOS, Windows, Linux, BSD, ChromeOS, etc.
Well I am tech neutral and can tell you you must be doing something wrong as when I reinstall macOS it does not take that long, not even close.
 
This is what the Apple apologists refuse to accept which is that Tim Cook is a money guy and is deeply cheap and miserly.
He does not care for the product like Steve Jobs did!

Steve fired a engineer for not caring about what font should be used on the iTunes store website, Cook only cares how much money he can empty from our pockets.

I will say the two are not mutually exclusive.

Apple is still in the business of selling us a great user experience, and managing their supply chain is how Apple is able to crank out said products in sufficient quantities for their customers.

The fact of the matter is that the Apple of today is a very different company compared to the Apple of yesteryear, and running it successfully is going to entail a different skill set and judgement calls to be made.

I accept that the new 256 gb SSD in the MBA is slower. I believe it was done to cope with the supply chain crunch, and I don’t think it will have any noticeable impact on the overall performance of the device. That’s how Apple has always rolled - specs aren’t as important as the experience they enable. And the 256 gb SSD will still be plenty fast for the people buying the entry level model and what they likely intend to use them for.

If you can’t accept this, and if you can’t accept that its decisions like this that have helped keep Apple at the top and made them as successful as they are today, then I can only say that you don’t understand business in general, and you don’t understand Apple.
 
Those small flash chips aren’t manufactured anymore, gee, maybe Apple knows better than you how big their market for 256 is and they are definitely serving a market.
And stop this BS about “future proofing”, if that is YOUR purpose then invest properly, entry level doesn’t serve that purpose
Yes they are still manufactured, I just found the wholesale price and it is just over $2!
So please stop apologising for behaviour from Apple that should not be defended.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: mdsco221 and jz0309
You're probably doing a reset rather than reinstall of MacOS. Anyhow, prove it. Start a video record from start to finish of creating USB bootable installer to reinstall of MacOS on M1 256GB using the method linked below.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201372
Why don't you prove it to us since you are claiming it takes so long despite me telling you my situation was worse than yours and it took me less than 1.5 hours total and that included going back to Mavericks and then upgrading back to Big Sur!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arnold Ziffel
Time to learn how to use Homebrew to get the native AS version...

https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/stockfish

However, hashcat might still be broken so you have to learn how to build it from source. Or, skip and play candy crush.
No offence but it is you who needs to learn as I told you before and I will keep telling you!
My situation was worse than yours any day of the week and yet I took less than 2 hours and yes that was from USB!
Please stop trolling!
 
Apple Support wouldn't know this level of detail, only engineering, plus, its not even released, so they wouldn't answer such type questions ... show proof
Actually they would know as it is their job to know such things.
I worked for BT Repair as a CSA yet I knew a lot of technical details that you would think the engineers would only know.
The reason is that it helped me to deal with customer's problems better and no I do not need to show proof, that is on yourself to do so seeing you are the one defending Apple here.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: jz0309
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.