Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A10 was the 2016 chip. Seeing as this will likely be released later in 2017, it should have an A11 chip, as (likely) will the next gen iPhone and iPad. But yes, on the increased RAM.
It will rocks with A10X already
 
I currently own every ATV version since the original. Overall the ATV4 has been a pretty big disappointment to me. The bugs are still a problem, and the underwhelming selection of games has been one of the biggest disappointments to me.

As for things that you would expect the ATV4 to be good at, such as Netflix, YouTube, Hulu, the apps are not nearly as good as the much older ATV3 imo.

I can only hope that the ATV5 will give us the revolutionary experience that Apple promised us at the ATV4 launch.

I hated the Netflix app on my Apple TV 2s and 3s. Forcing it into the same interface Apple used was just nuts. I would switch over to the native app on my other devices back in those days instead. The new app has some quirks (delay in loading while user interaction is already live or switching the order of shows but leaving the focus at the same index) but I think it's miles ahead of the old app.
 
I hated the Netflix app on my Apple TV 2s and 3s. Forcing it into the same interface Apple used was just nuts. I would switch over to the native app on my other devices back in those days instead. The new app has some quirks (delay in loading while user interaction is already live or switching the order of shows but leaving the focus at the same index) but I think it's miles ahead of the old app.
I think the ATV3 version was easy to navigate, better for browsing, and gives a lot more information about a movie. '

If you want to know what actress played in a movie, the information was right there. If you want to see what other movies on Netflix she plays in, again the info is right there.

Genres are much better too. For the longest time, the ATV4 version of Netflix didn't have genres. Now it does, but it is very basic. Say I wanted to watch a vampire movie, but wasn't sure what one, on the ATV3's Netflix, I could browse Movie>horror>Vampire for example.

The ATV4 UI is visually nice, but messy and never in set order. Sometimes recently watched is at the top, sometimes the middle, and sometimes the end.

There are many other things about the ATV4 version that I think sucks compared to the ATV3, but I think the things I mentioned are enough.

What about the ATV3 version do you dislike?
 
If/when Apple releases a 4K HDR ATV I'll take a long look at it. I recently picked up a 2017 nVidia Shield Pro and it's a pleasure to have everything I regularly use (Netflix, Amazon, Vudu, Youtube, HBO and Starz) available on one device with 4K and HDR support that works fine with my Harmony remote. I still have an ATV4 that I use for the limited content I picked up from Apple but use it less and less. I don't have anything against the ATV4, just don't find it compelling right now as it's been lapped by other devices.
 
I don't think he's asking who has more 4K content. He's asking does his 4K content get downgraded to 1080p if it's streamed through the ATV.

Yes. That's exactly what I was asking. Essentially, I wanted to know if there was really a point to upgrade my Apple TV which I bought last year for the purpose of 4k. It seems like you guys are all saying that most content is not 4k anyway, so if "4k" is the main reason for upgrading, then it's not worth it until more streaming content goes to 4k. Do I have all of that right? My TV is a Samsung that I just got and it is 4k.
 
Nice. Almost upgraded to a Roku Premiere but will hold out for this now. All computers in my house are Mac so might as well join the ecosystem. I guess if they don't add a Prime app I can use my ****** LG Smart TV for that.
 
Yes. That's exactly what I was asking. Essentially, I wanted to know if there was really a point to upgrade my Apple TV which I bought last year for the purpose of 4k. It seems like you guys are all saying that most content is not 4k anyway, so if "4k" is the main reason for upgrading, then it's not worth it until more streaming content goes to 4k. Do I have all of that right? My TV is a Samsung that I just got and it is 4k.
If you purchased your ATV4 last year with the express intent of watching 4K content... sorry bud, you're going to have to pony up again if you want a 4K capable ATV. I've always said it was weird that Apple's product line up was 4K capable minus the ATV. If for no other reason than future proofing, your 4K TV is just fine. The prices are more than reasonable and will only get better.
 
I bought one when the 4th generation was released and honestly I was underwhelmed. It's really only a minor refresh( as is most Apple releases as of late) and doesn't really bring anything new to the table outside of Siri which barely understands anything you say. Outside of having access to iTunes material there really isn't anything any other streaming box or stick can't do better. As of now I have a Mi box and it runs circles around the Apple Tv
 
The GPU (more precisely the display controller) simply does not have the capability to create a 4K signal --- that was not part of the design specs. The iPhone 7+ has 1080p resolution.
Of more relevance to the future, it seems more likely that the next AppleTV will use the A10X. The current iPad Pro 12" is 2732 x 2048 (larger than 1440p resolution of 2560 x 1440, but less than 4K = 3840 x 2160). It's not clear if the A9X (in the current iPad Pro 12") has a display controller that could handle 4K, but it seems certain that the A10X will. Obviously the rest of "decent 4K support", like performant games, will also demand a beefed up GPU.

All of which suggests to me that the next AppleTV will be based on the A10X, not the A11.
The only question, then, is when it ships. Much around the same time as the new iPads (so likely within a month)? Or delayed until a release at WWDC (why? to have something new to announce as a new HW target with substantially boosted 3rd party developer capabilities?) or delayed until September (can't work without functionality that ships in the 2017 iOS/TVOS/watchOS package?)

Certainly (to go off on a tangential rant) the quality of the TV app on iOS is ASTONISHINGLY bad --- the sort of thing I'd expect from some 3rd party no-name developer.
If the current Apple TV shares its never-ending stream of bugs (NONE fixed yet in either iOS 10.1 or 10.2...), from unbelievably poor performance to random crashes to constant memory leaks to ignoring taps to painful and stupid UI, then I could well believe that, even if the HW is ready to go at the time of the iPad release, they may have to delay it till September and the new iOS/TVOS release to pick up a version of TV.app written by people who know WTF they are doing.
So you were saying despite of iPhone capable of recording 4K is not capable of playing the video? The only reason why you're not seeing 4K video on iPhone is because the display is a much lower resolution. Behind the scene obviously that video is playing 4K in my opinion. I've seen less capable devices than iPhone that plays 4K video, some of them at least 3 years old hardware.
 
The TV is not the problem. It's the total poop called programmes that is the problem.
 
Biggest issue for me with the AppleTV is that it is just Apple being lazy. All the rumours from 2 years ago suggested that Apple was looking to finalised their streaming TV plans and unveil them alsongside the Apple TV box at WWDC (presumably then running developer sessions on the TvOS app store). Of course, we know what happened: Apple couldn't lock down the deals and delayed release until the Autumn, but then they seemed to just dump out the hardware and the App Store and expect the developers to do all the work. Similar to the Watch where Apple over-relied on the developers to provide the killer apps. 4K isn't going to solve this - imagine a new AppleTV with 4K/HDR and faster A10 chip but no other differece: apart from (presumably) 4K Netflix and probably 4k iTunes Movies (and no free upgrades to 4K). Is that really worth $150/£140 etc? There is another thread in the AppleTV forum on whether the 4th gen is dying and unless Apple pulls its thumb out to sort out the software/apps it will die. The attitude of 'if you build it they will come' with the app stores clearly isn't working. Apple should have seen what is missing - games haven't taken off as they should, desired apps (Prime Video, VUDU, UK catch-up apps etc) haven't appeared - and correct it either by getting the cheque book out, or some new software feature - e.g. emulation of iOS apps on TvOS would let Prime Video etc be run without a dedicated TvOS app with a slightly worse interface.
 
Nice, I know the Apple TV gets a lot of hate around here but I really like the ones I have.
Yeah, my 3rd Gen ATV is still doing a great job streaming 1080p content (both locally through my Mac and streaming from the internet) to my projector. The only reason I'm even considering upgrading is because of TVos apps for new channels that have come out that I don't have access to.
[doublepost=1489708106][/doublepost]
As for things that you would expect the ATV4 to be good at, such as Netflix, YouTube, Hulu, the apps are not nearly as good as the much older ATV3 imo.

Worse how? I'm running at ATV3 and generally loving it aside from some apps I'd like to try out.
 
Yes. That's exactly what I was asking. Essentially, I wanted to know if there was really a point to upgrade my Apple TV which I bought last year for the purpose of 4k. It seems like you guys are all saying that most content is not 4k anyway, so if "4k" is the main reason for upgrading, then it's not worth it until more streaming content goes to 4k. Do I have all of that right? My TV is a Samsung that I just got and it is 4k.

Any new :apple:TV model is going to have newer, faster, better hardware and probably at least a few new software niceties. It's not going to be exactly the same as the 4 except that the one new thing it can do is 4K.

There is not a single app on the iOS App Store exclusively for iPhone 8 but Apple is advancing that hardware anyway... and nobody finds any fault for them doing so.

New hardware is generally better, even for those who may have no use yet for the standout feature. Those happy with the "as is"- be that current :apple:TV or iPhone or iPad or Mac- can just keep enjoying what they have.

In your case, there's no absolute answer to your question. If you have no use for a 4K version yet, you get your answer by seeing what else a newer version brings and then deciding based on those other features.

However, since you already have a 4K TV, at least your pictures will look sharper and better exploit the TV. Have you shot any 4K yourself? If so, it will be easier to watch, and watch at 4K instead of scaled down to 1080p (throwing out detail) and then scaled back up (making up replacement detail) by your TV. Some apps will take advantage of the added resolution. Podcasts. And some Studios will try to make a buck with some early 4K versions of their content. We saw exactly the same "issue" when Apple finally went 1080p. The day before, there were no rentals, podcasts, apps, etc at 1080p.
 
Last edited:
We've been a predominantly Apple household for the last 10 years and I've owned Apple TVs since the original. But over the past couple years, the Apple TV lost it's luster and fell far behind the competition, so I've since moved onto Chromecasts, FireTVs, and now an Nvidia Shield TV unit. The only advantage the Apple TV offers is access to iTunes content, something I stopped purchasing years ago do to Apple's draconian restrictions. No Amazon content, no Google Play content on the Apple TV either---content I can access on pretty much every other device made today. The Shield TV and Fire TVs are such far more capable devices, I can't see Apple including anything in a new Apple TV that would entice me back.
do you never use airplay? remote app from your watch or phone? I use airplay daily. Have my 500+ movie collection being able to stream that way is pretty nice. I have kodi side loaded as well as emulators for nes/snes/genesis games. Appletv's are great imo
 
That may have been true a few years ago, but I completely disagree with this statement today. My in-laws are technophobes and bought a Chromcast box and have had no trouble getting it up and running. These are people that cannot setup their own email accounts in an email client and use the hunt and peck method for typing. Their Chromebox was $80 and an AppleTV starts at $250 here in NZ. I mean it's great if you're wealthy and live in Silicon Valley, New York etc, but AndriodTV and Chromcast as much more accessible for most people.

A lot of new TV's come with AndroidTV and therefore they have no need to buy an Apple TV. My new Sony came with it and no one in my family has any problems using it. It has Amazon and Netflix built in and apps are simple and easy to install. The voice search works great and YouTbue videos look amazing, better than on my computer. The only reason I'd consider an Apple TV is to stream content from my computer or device, but I'm not going to bother, I'm moving over to the OS that is open and on way more devices.

I stream from my Mac Mini , I have an Ap that give DLNA. Works well, I was streaming to an Xbox and my TV directly without problems.

Siri on my iPhone has been there for years, however there is still no sign of siri for the ATV (one of the reasons I bought the ATV4) and I have my doubts it will ever be available now, apple is likely to hold it over as a selling point for the ATV5

However, I have bought my last ATV.
 
Even if the do a new AppleTV it ain't comin' out until Sept./Oct. Tim Cook likes his pipelines empty unless they absolutely have to ship something.
 
Roku is awful - super unresponsive and inconsistent UI. I've tried it many times, and just hate it. Worst remote ever too.

Bought 3 Roku Streaming sticks recently to run my newly subscribed Playstation Vue service and I'm ecstatic with the device. It's not unresponsive at all. My Apple TV's are collecting dust since I bought these 3 devices for the price of one f&#king Apple TV.

With the prices of the new MacBook Pros, I never thought I'd see the day where I start shedding Apple products from my household. It's started with my Apple TV's...
 
We've been a predominantly Apple household for the last 10 years and I've owned Apple TVs since the original. But over the past couple years, the Apple TV lost it's luster and fell far behind the competition, so I've since moved onto Chromecasts, FireTVs, and now an Nvidia Shield TV unit. The only advantage the Apple TV offers is access to iTunes content, something I stopped purchasing years ago do to Apple's draconian restrictions. No Amazon content, no Google Play content on the Apple TV either---content I can access on pretty much every other device made today. The Shield TV and Fire TVs are such far more capable devices, I can't see Apple including anything in a new Apple TV that would entice me back.
[doublepost=1489715655][/doublepost]you can airplay Amazon Prime to your Apple TV. Works well. Amazon has it built in to their Amazon Prime app for iPhone
 
Finally a decent ATV5 rumor! A new Apple TV primarily needs two things, first 4K, and second HDR. With any luck, it will be announced at a Spring event, but pessimistically we may have to wait until Fall. Just had a 55" Sony XBR900E delivered yesterday and it would be nice to have a source that could provide 4K HDR content hooked up to my entertainment center. I'm currently still using an ATV3 for most of my streaming needs.
 
do you never use airplay?

Nope, haven't used AirPlay in ages. Google Cast is a far better solution---doesn't require tying up another of my devices.

remote app from your watch or phone?

Only when I couldn't find the Apple/Siri remote. No real advantage either as all of the other boxes I've used or use also offer iPhone applications, even for the Android TV box. Guess what isn't available for use on Android phones? An Apple TV native remote app.

I use airplay daily. Have my 500+ movie collection being able to stream that way is pretty nice.

Why are you streaming your movie collection via AirPlay instead of just using the Apple TV itself? I could stream my movie collection stored on my NAS either via the Plex App or the Computers app (via home sharing) on the Apple TV. And I can do the same thing on our Fire TVs or the Nvidia Shield TV.

I have kodi side loaded as well as emulators for nes/snes/genesis games. Appletv's are great imo

Yup, you can spend $99 for an Apple developer account and sideload Kodi on the Apple TV using Xcode, or put it on an Android TV box by, :eek:, installing it from the Google Play Store. Hmmmm, decisions, decisions. ;)

Snark aside, I'm glad the Apple TV is working out for you. My only point is that, unless you are solely immersed in the Apple ecosystem with tons of iTunes DRM video, the Apple TV offers next to zero advantages over the competition.
[doublepost=1489721579][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1489715655][/doublepost]you can airplay Amazon Prime to your Apple TV. Works well. Amazon has it built in to their Amazon Prime app for iPhone

Or I can play it natively on a Shield TV, Fire TV, or Roku, in 4K as well if the content is available at that resolution, without the need for another $650+ device.
 
Last edited:
Just like there's no iTunes content on amazon fire or google play either?



We've been a predominantly Apple household for the last 10 years and I've owned Apple TVs since the original. But over the past couple years, the Apple TV lost it's luster and fell far behind the competition, so I've since moved onto Chromecasts, FireTVs, and now an Nvidia Shield TV unit. The only advantage the Apple TV offers is access to iTunes content, something I stopped purchasing years ago do to Apple's draconian restrictions. No Amazon content, no Google Play content on the Apple TV either---content I can access on pretty much every other device made today. The Shield TV and Fire TVs are such far more capable devices, I can't see Apple including anything in a new Apple TV that would entice me back.
 
People keep blaming Apple for things they have nothing to do with. I've seen two people in this thread say Apple needs to have 4K versions of their movies. The fact is, there isn't that much 4K content out there. There's approximately 150 4K blu rays available. That's not a lot of movies. Until the studios convert and release their movies in 4K, it's a non issue. Not to mention that most ISPs have data caps now and 4K will burn through your data cap in no time.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.