What was the strategic value in acquiring Beats Music? And please don’t say Jimmy Iovine.Is there even any strategic value in acquiring Spotify?
What was the strategic value in acquiring Beats Music? And please don’t say Jimmy Iovine.Is there even any strategic value in acquiring Spotify?
That is the problem. Nothing is HomeKit compatible except smart switches and lights. I more than anyone want Siri to be able to do those things. I have mentioned elsewhere that I find Siri to be much more responsive than Alexa and google home. I just want the "smart" side of things to catch up.
Brand and maybe few tech guys. Oh and Jimmy.What was the strategic value in acquiring Beats Music? And please don’t say Jimmy Iovine.
I understood this. Just would suck not to be able to tell the HomePod to play a specific song
Apple has no competitors? That's new.Because Apple doesn't compete with anyone. Never has.
What was the strategic value in acquiring Beats Music? And please don’t say Jimmy Iovine.
So buy an Echo for your home automation stuff, and get a HomePod for better quality audio? Not sure why people are so stuck on "either or" instead of "both"? You've already crossed that line if you use an Echo and have an iPhone...
That's not competition.That's a sales pitch.Apple has no competitors? That's new.
I recall Steve Jobs during the iPhone debut discussing how the iPhone compared to competitor's products.
A sales pitch against competitor's products. If they were not competitors, why not do a sales pitch against a gas oven instead? If they weren't competitors, there would be little need for a sales pitch to show how much better it is to use your fingers over a stylus.That's not competition.That's a sales pitch.
When they make one i'm sure they will. Apples business model doesn't revolve around competition as you understand it. This is quite obvious.A sales pitch against competitor's products. If they were not competitors, why not do a sales pitch against a gas oven instead?
Do you believe Apple, or any company for that matter, completely ignores what their competitors are doing at all times?When they make one i'm sure they will. Apples business model doesn't revolve around competition as you understand it. This is quite obvious.
Depends on your point of view.
I would love a high quality speaker to use to listen to music, use as a computer speaker, and to connect to my TV. The HomePod sounds like it has fantastic sound quality at a price that is fantastic for the quality; a true marvel of engineering. But it's not a "speaker" it's a "siri-extender".
As a speaker of it's quality, it would be well worth the $350. As an extremely limited eco-system lock-in device albeit with magnificent sound quality, it is grossly overpriced. Apple fans are always fond of saying it's not the specs but what you can do with it. Well here is a product with excellent specs that you just can't do a whole lot with.
I will never have Apple Music. I don't want to say there's anything wrong with the service, streaming is simply not for me. I'm of an age where I have a large library of my own (legally purchased) music, and I add very few songs per month to my collections. Apple Music is simply not for me.
So where does that leave me with HomePod? I can't listen to my music with it unless I airplay from my phone which is very inconvenient. I can't use it in place of a sound bar for my TV. I can't connect it to my computer as a speaker.
Tl,dr; given what you can actually do with a homepod, it is grossly overpriced. Add a bit more connectivity to well-engineered core and it would have been a great device at a great price. But allowing customers to actually use their hardware decently is against Apple's DNA these days.
What was the strategic value in acquiring Beats Music? And please don’t say Jimmy Iovine.
Completely? Of course not, but they aren't chasing same number, spec or whatever. If they did things like wireless charging, oled, sc cards and mnay other thing would be available on iphones since 2014 or earlier.Do you believe Apple, or any company for that matter, completely ignores what their competitors are doing at all times?
Yea I actually don't think Siri is all that bad, they just needed the microphone set up like the Echo's have. All of the assistants are pretty useless to me aside from turning on lights, adjusting the temp, weather, news, and playing music. Siri handles all of this well, but I think Apple needs to open this up like other platforms to truly make an impact. In time, I am sure it will.
Mine just arrived. As other reviewers stated, setup is a breeze and all you have to do is have it powered on and bring your phone close to it. Apparently, as of the Apple Watch, it does not support enterprise graded wireless network authentication (WPA Enterprise/WPA2 Enterprise).
First sounds impressions, it really sound good. For a portable speaker. Cannot expect a deep bass as I got on my 5.1 Klipsh HT system or my car stereo, but hey, there is no subwoofer on such a small device. But it sounds rich and might for it’s size.
Siri can hear me from the hallway, with a song playing in full volume. Not that I am planing to do it often but that is pretty darn sensitive. I do not expect to use it for more than the HomeKit home automation, but your needs might be different from mines. So far, I seem happy with it. Time will tell how good or bad it will end up being.
got to say the boom on this is incredibleCan you compare to UE BOOM, MEGABOOM or something from Libratone If you have?
[doublepost=1518187246][/doublepost]
No it's not.
To say Apple has never tried to compete on a spec basis is deceiving.Completely? Of course not, but they aren't chasing same number, spec or whatever. If they did things like wireless charging, oled, sc cards and mnay other thing would be available on iphones since 2014 or earlier.
When you get a chance can you share how the HomePod integrates with the rest of you HomeKit setup.
https://github.com/nfarina/homebridgecan control my lights, thermostat, security system, and harmony hub at the very least. My issues it not a restriction of the HomePod, but of HomeKit and apple's approach to smart devices. Basically I want the 3rd party integration I get with Alexa or google home, but from Siri.
As it stands, Siri can only control my lights out of all of the smart devices I have. At $350 I feel like it should be a central smart hub. I can outfit my entire home with google home or Alexa devices for the cost of a single HomePod. Then again, Apple appears to have shifted completely away from it being a smart device in their adds and focus solely on music.
MicDrop!I'll happily post negative ones too, I just haven't seen any yet.
Siri does literally all of these things, I don’t know what you’re talking about. In fact HomeKit can automatically arm my alarm when the last person in the family has left because it has GPS occupancy status for multiple users.For those of us that actually are invested in a smart home the differences are massive.
Ask Siri to control your thermostat
Ask Siri to turn on your home theater
Ask Siri to arm/disarm your alarm
Ask Siri to show you your front door, rear door
Those are a few things I use on a daily basis. I very much agree with you that most people who own Alexa/google home are using that basic functionality, but if you have smart home integration the HomePod is a big step down. Can you even add stuff to a shopping list with the HomePod?
Meh. Before Apple acquired Beats I don’t remember anyone saying what the company needed was a profitable headphone company. Seems to me people are using it to justify the acquisition. Apple bought Beats at its peak popularity. I remember going in to Best Buy stores and seeing nothing but Beats on the shelves in the headphone section. Now go to Best Buy and Beats occupy one corner. Bose, Sony and high end cans from B&O, Audio Technica, Beyerdynamic, AKG, etc. have just as much prominence.For the money, a profitable headphone company, a music streaming service that could be readily scaled to Apple’s needs, as yes, Iovine’s deep ties to the music industry and Hollywood.
It was certainly a better deal than acquiring spotify at any rate, especially when the deals would have to be renegotiated at any rate and there was no guarantee that the original subscribers would have stuck around.