I still don't understand the Air in the name. I'm pretty sure most people call it just an iPad. We all know it's thin.
You may jest, but I was thinking randomly earlier today that a rack full of iPads would make one powerful beowulf cluster.
Now.... 2GB of RAM.... do I upgrade my Air 1? Go for the gold? Lots more to think about now.
Sorry Pogue, you are losing your mojo. Your stuff with the Times was so much better.
And that's why there's portable batteries, for those oft times you're on a transatlantic flight (plus some airport time).
I don't disagree btw, I'd be happy if it was slightly thicker if it improved battery life, but for most use cases people aren't on transatlantic flights, and if a person is frequently in that spot, then they should either get a secondary portable power supply or a longer lasting device (not to mention it 11.15 hours is still quite a flight).
But can it rotate the keyboard without lagging, or do we need to wait for quad cores to do that?
hilarious, but battery life hasn't gotten worse. My iPhone 6 lasts all day. I don't need it to go longer than that. If they have an option for a thicker phone with better battery life that's fine, but I don't want to carry around a thick phone all day.
And the topic here is iPad, but thanks for sharing.
Your argument is even worse. I can use my iPad several days before charging. What's the point of making it fat?
What about New Zealand, thats a beautiful country too!
Still waiting for a compelling reason to upgrade from an iPad 3.
Ughhh... they should have kept he form factor, as surely a tiny bit of thickness is second to battery life...
But will itblendbend?
Unless I've missed it, how come nobody is talking about the extra CPU core here? This is the first I've read about a third CPU core in the Air 2 -- this is a pretty big step forward given how effectively iOS will use CPU cores at both the OS level and the application level.
This device is a bigger step forward power wise than I initially thought it was.
But thinness is most important.![]()
That's called pushing innovation and it will pay off in the long run
At what point do you stop making things thinner that sacrifices battery power?
Would be great to see the next one or two revisions not thinner but have a giant leap in battery life.
Cue the innovation argument though....
When a Retina display is involved. I agree with you, but that's the answer to the question. I think the iPad battery life is fine. But on iPhones, COME ON. Yeah, the iPhone 6 is like .0012 mm thinner than the 5s. I would've rather had the same thickness with all the new engineering behind the design but a little bit more battery. That larger display makes me want to use it more. If I could use the crap out of it and go to bed with 30 percent, I'd be happy. I would love to see one that could go for two days, but I use it way too much to think about that without a huge jump in battery.
No ones remarked the contrasting ring around the main button is hideous.
To be fair the iPad for intents and purposes hasn't changed much since iPad 2 design and Retina were added.
Its just faster CPU, thinner, faster CPU, thinner, faster CPU. The End.
Not many people are gonna be paying $400 every year for that.
Phones are necessities and are subsidised, tablets are largely luxuries that aren't.
That Battery priority obviously went into the iPhone 6 Plus this time around...I am hoping Apple equalizes battery life next year, whether its by an iOS update (with a power saving mode) or devices with even better battery tech. iPads have always been known for longer battery... So lets see if that 12.9in iPad will have the best battery in the iPad line.
Only thing I can see next year will be a9x and maybe 15 hour battery.
I like extreme minimalism.