Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm confused. Apple promises 10 hours of battery life and the Air 2 gets over 11 hours and people are still complaining? When will you guys ever be happy? I'm just amazed that this device is faster than my freaking iMac and MacBook Pro. That's amazing.
 
"Apples iPad Air is an entire millimetre thinner than the original Air"

Whoa, how is that even possible, a whole entire millimetre, absolutely humongous.

It actually makes a big difference to the overall size, it's 20% smaller than the Air 1 in terms of volume.
 
I wonder when we'll have a serious gadget review site like the ones in the pc world (Tom's Hardware) or digital cameras (DP Review).

There's a site called Anandtech. It usually releases its review a bit later but in terms of depth and objectivity, it's unsurpasssed.
 
It would be pretty easy to show that Apple isn't listening to--and hasn't listened to--customers since ... well, you know when.
"Apple is not listening to you" does not equal "Apple is not listening to customers".

If Apple were designing products that "the customers" hate, then "the customers" would not be buying them anymore. A religious core of fanboys that will buy anything with an Apple on it only gets you that far.

And no, I am not happy with every decision Apple takes. I still can't believe how they crippled Pages, and I am foaming at the mouth over the lack of a quad core Mac Mini option. I am just saying that "the customers" are obviously happy, or else there wouldn't be record revenues and profits.

----------

Hmmmm, I may be wrong, but everytime I read a post that has 90% sentences stating "I want..." (in all it's variations) but still claims to be speaking for 90% of any group of people...it does raise some doubts ...

So are you complaining about the fact that I used a "90% sentence" or are you actually disputing the fact that 90% of all users don't mind going from 12 to 10 hours of battery life as long as they get a device that is easier to hold? ;)

I don't know a lot of people who are trekking through the Sahara with the iPad in their backpack or who are crossing the Atlantic in a canoe with their iPad, so that is where my "90%" statement originated.
 
Mossberg is useless. Why anybody still reads his copy is beyond me.

Joanna Stern from WSJ discovers tablet can break if you drop them on concrete! :eek: Someone please lend her an iPad cover!
 
Sonmi451, huh????

Then why is half your population living in Australia!?!?

This comment made my day! :D

I have to be honest us Aussies have the good life, first on the release list for :apple: products and also have one of the best LTE networks - I consistently pull above 70mpbs/30mbps in Perth, usually much more though. I feel for the Americans raving about 10-20mbps download rates like they are a true breakthrough in technology, which I was superseding on my iPad 3 on 3G HSPA+.
 
Besides, when I set the iPad Air 2 down for a second on a bench, it slid off and hit concrete, shattering the screen. Sure, I'm to blame, but if Apple wants me to climb every mountain armed with nothing but an iPad, ruggedness should be as important as anti-reflectivity.
I read this three hours ago, and still my rage knows no bounds.

Someone gets a review version of a quite expensive device that a lot of people would like to have and actually breaks it by putting it "down for a second on a bench". And then comments on this by saying "Sure, I'm to blame, but actually, Apple is to blame."

If I get a device from my employer and I break it, I will have a non-enjoyable conversation with my boss. Apparently, the WSJ is a bit more relaxed when it comes to breaking items provided to their employees.
 
I've got mine :)

I never had an Air (I'm coming from a 3rd Gen) so I'm primarily loving how thin and light it is, but I can safely say that yes, this time Safari really is snappier! So far I have six tabs open (most very picture heavy too) and have had no reloading! :)
 
I think it's perfectly in line with how Apple views the customer. They don't want customers to worry about things like RAM. They just advertise things that normal people care about: namely, the experience.

ipadspecs.jpg


Not last weeks keynote, but you get the idea. Apple DO get technical in their conferences...stop moving goal posts

I have to agree with most of the sentiment in here. Really dissapointed in the thinness vs battery life, in addition, as a new iPhone 6 Plus user, the 2GB of RAM is disappointing. I am constantly having refreshes in Safari, sometimes with only 3 tabs open, and multiple apps running out of memory and restarting e.g. iPlayer app losing my location in a video

With removing the mute button, soldering on RAM in the mini, I am struggling to see where Apple is going with some of these decisions
 
The headline perpetuates an idea that battery performance is seriously impacted in the iPad Air 2. When in fact, the difference is minimal, and it still stands up to Apple's usage claims.
 
I don't think I will be upgrading from my iPad 4 anytime soon. Currently 50% battery left with 8 hours of use. Mostly YouTube (48%) and Safari (43%). Maybe if I had really bad battery life I would upgrade. The lightness doesn't matter to me, (I throw cases on all my tech.)

It's worth noting that iPad Air 2 comes second out of all iPads under Mossberg's test conditions. You'll almost certainly see better battery life than you would with the fourth gen.
 
As a customer and shareholder, I am disappointed.

I want Apple to add/implement features that will sell units. Making the iPad 1mm thinner will have no material impact on sales. On the other hand, keeping the iPad the same thickness while improving battery life would improve sales.

That's what you say.

There will be plenty of people looking at a competitor's tablet, and then looking at an iPad, and the iPad is thinner and lighter so they buy that one. It's obviously not the only reason, but if X people buy tablet A and Y people buy an iPad, then some percentage of the X will now buy an iPad instead.

You don't see battery life when you are in the store. Even if you go to an Apple Store and try out the iPad, you can't see the battery life, so it doesn't change most people's buying decision. The battery life of their _previous_ tablet may change their buying decision (to avoid that brand, or to stay with it).

----------

Image

Not last weeks keynote, but you get the idea. Apple DO get technical in their conferences...stop moving goal posts

That was WWDC. That's a conference for software developers. It's absolutely something that you say on a software developer conference, but not something that you advertise to the buying public.

----------

Reading Joanna Sterns review: I don't think Apple wants you to climb any mountains with only an iPad. I think Apple would prefer if you stayed at home, and safely put away all sharp objects, so you don't hurt yourself. All the other reviewers can say "no iPads were hurt in the making of this review".
 
I'm confused. Apple promises 10 hours of battery life and the Air 2 gets over 11 hours and people are still complaining? When will you guys ever be happy? I'm just amazed that this device is faster than my freaking iMac and MacBook Pro. That's amazing.

Yep. You'll just never please some people.

You get good battery life in the Air 2 and somewhere in that body are components that make it, as you said, faster than some computers.

The Air 2 is an amazing device.
 
It's worth noting that iPad Air 2 comes second out of all iPads under Mossberg's test conditions. You'll almost certainly see better battery life than you would with the fourth gen.

Probably correct. Mossberg even states in his review that the iPad Air 2 had the best battery life he had ever seen. So in essence, there is no "downwards trend", but they basically went back to what they had offered on all previous product iterations and what was sufficient for most customers. At least I don't remember a large number of complaints about iPad 1/2/3/4 battery life.
 
My god the MacRumors title is so misleading. From every reviewer, the iPad Air 2 still stays powered more than the advertised 10-hours of battery life, at 11 hours or so, but just a little lower than the original Air's 13 hours of battery. You people just want to find anything to complain about!

My Air 2 is on the way, and hopefully will get delivered today :cool:
 
It actually makes a big difference to the overall size, it's 20% smaller than the Air 1 in terms of volume.
Does that mean if you drop it into a bucket of water it takes up less space.

----------

My god the MacRumors title is so misleading. From every reviewer, the iPad Air 2 still stays powered more than the advertised 10-hours of battery life, at 11 hours or so, but just a little lower than the original Air's 13 hours of battery. You people just want to find anything to complain about!

My Air 2 is on the way, and hopefully will get delivered today :cool:
I'll bet you got the Gold one.

----------

Probably correct. Mossberg even states in his review that the iPad Air 2 had the best battery life he had ever seen. So in essence, there is no "downwards trend", but they basically went back to what they had offered on all previous product iterations and what was sufficient for most customers. At least I don't remember a large number of complaints about iPad 1/2/3/4 battery life.
Read the comments on here, heaps of people want more battery life.
 
People like it when they ram more memory into a thinner form.

Now I don't have to remember to close my tab when some hot new app enters the store.

I'm excited for my pad to have more memories.

You never had to do this in the first place. Apps are being killed off if there are no resources free for new apps you want to open.

So tiring watching people manually closing apps. Get windows or android if you like these obsolete habits.

Killing apps manually reduces your battery life rather than saving you battery life.
 
Read the comments on here, heaps of people want more battery life.

No, what I see are people who complain that the battery life is lower on the Air 2 than on the Air 1, even though hardly anyone ever complained about the battery life on previous iPads. How many of the people who complain about battery life now complained that their iPad 1/2/3/4 didn't have sufficient battery life? And is it really so cumbersome to charge an iPad ten times a month as opposed to charging it eight times a month?

But in any case, there are always people who want more battery life. There are also heaps of people who want a higher resolution screen, split-screen multitasking, a stylus, a 13 inch iPad, an SD card slot, 4GB of RAM, two USB ports, a keyboard, a mouse, an FM receiver, etc. "Heaps of people" often translates to "10 people on some forum".
 
It's just faster CPU, thinner, faster CPU, thinner, much faster CPU, new fully-laminated screen, Touch ID, improved camera, barometer (I confess I don't know what the barometer is supposed to do on an iPad, but it's there).

The sales numbers will speak for themselves. No need to lie about the differences between the models.

Not lying.

And iPad sales numbers have already been speaking. Slumped is the magic word.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.