I do.Good lord, who wants this? Come on Apple.
I do.Good lord, who wants this? Come on Apple.
Where did you get $1000 from? Gurman? Spaghetti on the wall? It's pure speculation.I don't think at $1000 this is a device that the average consumer wants.
If someone wants to make a Facetime call or control their smart home why wouldn't they just use their phone or their ipad?
There might be a market if it was cheaper but this has that Vision Pro thing. Too little utility, too large a price tag.
Didn't Sheldon already have a working one of those years ago?Let’s all be honest it’s just gonna be an iPad Pro on a stand nothing special but more expensive even tho it’s less portable
Where did you get $1000 from? Made up? Spaghetti on the wall? It's nowhere in the article.
That is how rumors are perpetuated. Next thing you know, people here will be ranting and raving about the ridiculous price Apple is going to charge for what remains mostly a unknown beyond the good old rumor mill and "sources" claiming certain parts are being made.
I don't doubt there is some kind of similar to the rumors product underway, but the truth is no one knows anything, especially about price. In forums, unknowns have been known to exponentially grow from a gram to a kilogram in the blink of an eye.
In the simplest of terms, it's a device desgined to get people to subscribe to Apple services. That's the only segment within Apple that's actually growing by a meaningful amount each year and with the highest of margins.
I use mine every single day, so I wouldn’t say that.All iPads are substantially underutilized![]()
Not necessarily, if there’s voice commands built-in it would function just as the HomePod does today when the iPad is disconnected.It’ll be built-in, because otherwise it’s not family-compatible. You don’t want to be dependent on whether some family member just happened to take the screen to their room.
Don’t I?You have no imaginary skills. lol
The screen is supposed to have a useful function for the device’s primary use. It would be annoying if half of the time you find it is missing when you want to use it.Not necessarily, if there’s voice commands built-in it would function just as the HomePod does today when the iPad is disconnected.
I agree with you. This is just like calling Apple’s “AI” Apple Intelligence. 🙄Can we really call this a robot?
It might not be in the article, but it is in the original report, which is what this article is based off of.Where did you get $1000 from? Made up? Spaghetti on the wall? It's nowhere in the article.
It’s only focused on what Timmy wants these days. Get as much of your money as possible for the minimal effort Apple has to put in.Apple is losing its focus on what customers want
On the other hand, exactly how often do you need a screen that’s only 10-13 inches… restricted to being on a tabletop? And plugged into the wall?The screen is supposed to have a useful function for the device’s primary use. It would be annoying if half of the time you find it is missing when you want to use it.
My imagination tells me this will be a telepresence robot. It will have sensors and cameras similar to the Apple Vision Pro. The screen will display your face if you're accessing it using an iPhone or iPad, or your persona if you're connecting from an Apple Vision device. For best results, use Apple Vision, because then you'll see everything in 3D as if you're actually there. Feel free to look around. The motorized arm responds quickly.The descriptions of the product are literally… iPad screen on a robotic arm connected to a HomePod.
Not much imagination needed.
It’s an existing product category, like the Amazon Echo Show (since 2017) and the Google Nest Hub (since 2018).On the other hand, exactly how often do you need a screen that’s only 10-13 inches… restricted to being on a tabletop? And plugged into the wall?
Both of those products are around $100, not $1,000.It’s an existing product category, like the Amazon Echo Show (since 2017) and the Google Nest Hub (since 2018).
Personally I use an iPad that is mounted on the wall.
Well, they don't have a robot arm and are subsidized by ads.Both of those products are around $100, not $1,000.