Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
GFLPraxis said:
What will they call this? The iPod Micro?

We'll have a lineup like this:

iPod Micro, iPod Mini, iPod. Kinda weird...

Or maybe just iPod Flash? Or FlashPod?

I vote for ?Pod (if unicode doesn't work here that's the symbol mu before pod) pronounced like mewPod rather than microPod. I think its cool. But then again, I doubt the average person would.
 
OK - Let's be clear, this device (see below) WILL NOT be US$149. It just won't. Don't get your hopes up. Don't be disappointed when it isn't.

Many have pulled examples of comparable flash players for around 200 bucks. Apple (and the iPod brand, really) can afford to be at the TOP of that food chain. They have no reason to play at the bottom of it.

*IF* this is a "smaller-than-the-mini" device, I think we can expect it for 200. I don't think it's absurd that these would be the new mini's for some reason or another and go for 250. About the only reason this wouldn't work is because they don't really make 5GB flash drives.

But ultimately, the fact that this iPod is made with flash is completely irrelevent. It's all about storage capacity and ease-of-use. I think 1GB is a little low for storage capacity, but maybe Apple has some better research than I do.

Now, if this were actually the iPhone with 1GB of storage built in? Well...now you're cooking with gas.

Using flash in this case has an actual purpose, by shrinking the guts of the music player, you leave enough room for a phone in a casing about the size of an ipod mini - probably with a different design entirely, though.

And the cost of that will probably be $149. Provided you're talking about THOUSANDS of US Dollars. :)
 
Yvan256 said:
Yeah, I would be surprised if it really was 1GB/149$US and 2GB/199$US... My bet is also on 1GB/179$US (which would still kick ass).

I also don't think this rumor could be true. I think a 1 GB model at $180 would be amazing, but most likely it will come in at $199. There will probably be no 2 Gig model. Good 256MB players cost $150.

But if the rumor is true, that would be amazing.

lasuther
 
I was waiting for people to say "for $50 more, you can get the iPod mini..."

But I guess someone already did.

And to the person who said the iPod line is getting a little diverse, I don't think that's the case. It's pretty straight-forward to me. Plus Apple will probably drop the regular 20 and 40gig iPods and replace that line with the photo. Who knows.

Fishes,
narco.
 
Just wanted to add that I too think $149 would be excellent, but I find it difficult to believe. $199 at 1GiB seems most likely. I also doubt the 2 GiB.

To add another comparision to the mix, Wal-Mart now has their own consumer electronics brand called ilo, and they sell a 256 MB flash player for $80. And I think we can all agree that it don't get much cheaper than Wally World. Makes $149 seem even less likely to me.

Link: http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product_id=3202212
 
what's wrong with the ipod line becoming diverse ? it helps with the argument that if you buy from the iTMS and want to take your music with you, you have to use an iPod [or a CD]. At least there's a lot of iPod choices, from $149 (if the rumor holds true) to $599, plus Flash players, the mini, the regular iPod and HP branded ones, and the iPod Photo. Plus that iPhone.
 
adam1185 said:
ooh appleinsider has joined the flash ipod confirmation train

http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=813

Hrmmm , also reporting another small G4 powerbook update... Could this be the duel-core G4? What do people think?

Personally, I'd be a little pissed off with such a small jump.. keeping my fingers crossed that appleinsider has been fed a false rumor by apple so at least one thing at the expo is a surprise...
Or is hope just driving me blind ? :)

Rob
 
my guesses: iPod micro may be a bit more than $149 (but under $199), use the standard dock, will have much better battery life than either the mini or regular as well as being sturdier, will look like a slightly scaled down mini, the micro will sell like hotcakes and a lot of the buyers will already have an iPod (the micro will be the gym/beach/travel etc)
 
ACK!!! I didn't read carefully enough! they might get rid of the click wheel? How does this make any sense? They introduced it on the mini BECAUSE it was smaller, and needed fewer buttons and more space. They moved it to the regular ipod because it was way, way more elegant and easy to use.

They want to drop it? WHY!!!!!! it's the only real advantage they have over the million other flash players out there!
 
ccuilla said:
That would make it seem like the iPod micro at 1GB for $149 would be the real "bomb" then.

If the 1GB Zen Micro is 199$US, then Apple has a winner even at 199$US (I'm still hoping for 179$US though. But no way it's gonna be 149$US and still be 1GB).
 
GonzoRob said:
Hrmmm , also reporting another small G4 powerbook update... Could this be the duel-core G4? What do people think?

Personally, I'd be a little pissed off with such a small jump.. keeping my fingers crossed that appleinsider has been fed a false rumor by apple so at least one thing at the expo is a surprise...
Or is hope just driving me blind ? :)

Rob

You count going from a low FSB, single-core CPU to a higher FSB, dual-core CPU a small update?! Dual-core in a laptop, man!
 
A complete iPod line

puckhead193 said:
and how long do u think it will take for the new "flash ipod to ship" ....
Even better why pay $150 for 1 gig when for another $100 i could get 4 Gigs.. (as of now)
For 1 gig i can get about 250 songs at $150 where as the mini i could get about 1,000 for 100 bucks more... gig for gig... the mini seems logical...(as of now)
I think the pricing is to high/wrong maybe for $100 dollars for the 1 Gb and 150 for the 2gb.(but then again apple products are expensive)

I think the product will sell, some/most don't need to have more then 1/2 gig (250 songs) to be happy. Plus they can say "I have an ipod" and use ITMS

There are many reasons for having a small flash-based iPod instead of a larger HD model. Just like people bought the mini for the smaller size and more stylish looks (IMHO and obviuosly many others). Personally, I wish they made a "mini-styled" regular sized iPod with larger capacity. I own ~15 GB of music, so I had to pass on the mini although I like the styling much more than the regular iPods. I got a 20 GB 4G.

There are even more reason to get a flash-based iPod in my opinion.

1. Probably will be the cheapest type of iPod.
2. They are great for joggers, and those working out since they are more durable. This also means they are better for children who are often less careful with their possessions.
3. Flash is solidstate, which often has a longer lifespan than harddrive-based devices with moving parts.
4. Flash drives require less power, so the battery life will probably be excellent.
5. Flash drive allows for an even smaller iPod.

I think this fills out the iPod line completely. Yeah, they are not dirt cheap like some other MP3 players, but the iPod has been marketed as a premium device from the start, so paying $150 to get an entry-level iPod seems reasonable. I still think, $150 is a good price-point where parents would start buying them for their kids, especially considering that flash-based iPods would be more durable.
 
Yvan256 said:
You count going from a low FSB, single-core CPU to a higher FSB, dual-core CPU a small update?! Dual-core in a laptop, man!

For the sake of 1/2 a year until the g5 is out (this is assuming the rumor is correct) it is doubtful that apple would use a duel core G4 for such a small amout of time.
I have a feeling that the bump to 1.6 something will just be a mild speed increase .
I *really* hope im wrong. I want a duel-core more than a g5 :)
R
 
Anyone interested in this, be sure to read the Daring Fireball take on it from a few weeks back:

http://daringfireball.net/2004/12/flash_gordon

The problem is that all of this speculation hinges on the idea of product categories that don’t really exist. The idea is that there exist two categories of portable digital music player: hard-drive-based and flash-memory-based. And that since the iPod utterly dominates the hard-drive-based category, it makes sense that Apple will start producing flash-based iPods so they can dominate that category too.
 
ChrisH3677 said:
i'll be quite disappointed if the go for the 1 & 2GB sizes. I want an iPod I can afford. At those prices it creates a dilemma of whether to fork out the extra for a mini.

Sounds like their marketting people know what they're doing. They've created a slight product overlap that may lead you to upgrade to a higher model.

I think they really have to position these in the lower end of the market.

Considering there are two types of buyers for these:
1) Those who can't afford a HDD model
2) People working out.

I'm in the first category and want to get an iPod for as cheap as I can.

Not to be mean here, but consumers get this idea sometimes that something is overpriced if they (personally) can't afford it. If you don't like the price point of the flash model, and you can't afford an HD-based music player, then maybe you can't afford an iPod. That doesn't mean they're overpriced. It means they're beyond your budget. I don't have an iPod because I can't justify spending that much money on one now.
 
Arguments for an iPod micro

There have been attempts by some to assert an iPod micro with all the positive features of the iPod and iPod mini is physically impossible.

Born genius that I am, I can propose at least one way that a large screen and scroll wheel could be compatible in a credit card size form factor.

Simply the scroll wheel would be on the back and the screen on the front.

The operation of the scroll wheel is pretty much touchy feely and the screen offers the necessary visual feedback. Voilé!
 
iPod flash for 149,- a good idea? and more....

I just wonder what this new iPod has to offer that is different from other flash based players at the same price, apart from a sexy family tree and obvious sexy looks.... My thoughts are this:

... if they would launch an updated iPod mini for the same price as the current one, and sell the current configuration for less than $200,- ($189,-perhaps, anyone?) that would be a killer for the flash based players!
Okay, flash based is nice in terms of shock resistance etc etc, but storage isn't all that great at this point in time
Oh well, Apple probably has investigated this with some clever marketing people, and are bound to get it right, they need to move on if they do not want to loose marketshare as they did way back in the early '90's with the original Macintosh.
That said:
The current Mac line up is pretty strong though, needs a little more CPU power here and there to get through to those customers stuck in that old Mhz myth (which isn't a complete fabrication, although far over rated), as for the OS, is there another OS out there that has this ease of use, so integrated, so bloody perfected? Don't think so, they might be good, but not 'that' good.... ;)
 
BWhaler said:
Conspiracy Theory:

Maybe the flash rumor is wrong, and TS purposely put this fake article out so they could claim they have no real inside secrets and no names to share. They just get this stuff sent to them via the anonymous mail link.

[/Takes_Off_Tin_Foil_Hat]

Of course, I don't really believe this, but the thought did occur to me.

My bet is they have lawyers giving them bad advice, or they wanted to send a big FYou to Apple. Probably both.

yeah, i thought the same thing. Seemed off the wall for them to put out another huge prediction the day after it is announced that they are being sued.
 
Chobit said:
I vote for ?Pod (if unicode doesn't work here that's the symbol mu before pod) pronounced like mewPod rather than microPod. I think its cool. But then again, I doubt the average person would.

I think it's a really nice idea, but the fact that it's difficult to type and/or get the µ (mu) to display correctly probably rules it out.

Unless Steve is really mad at the media for spreading all these rumors and wants to get revenge. Newsrooms across the world will be scrambling to find out how to type µ (mu)! :D
 
Yvan256 said:
Steve never trashed flash players based on the technology, but on their capacity. He was right when he said that 64-256MB players are pretty useless.

IMO however Apple won't have two models of iPod micro. I don't believe it because their iPod mini has only one size: 4GB.

I predict it's gonna be a 1GB iPod micro for 149$US (because I said that, of course, it'll be 179$US).

Unless ThinkSecret had information from an insider again, in which case I wonder what they'll do with the mini (4GB and 5GB models? Not much difference if you ask me).

Actually, there are 5 models of the iPod Mini IIRC. :D

My friend actually has four of them...
 
Webcast?

Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but I've seen nothing about the Jobs Keynote being webcast... are they not doing that this year?

Thanks!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.