Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Do you want the option to turn Flash Player on and off on iPad?

  • Yes

    Votes: 185 60.1%
  • No

    Votes: 123 39.9%

  • Total voters
    308
Status
Not open for further replies.
Google and Amazon do not ban Flash in the browser to impose their 30% tax and they have no reason not to align on Apple AppStore.

:D Your logic is amazing. Apple, Google, and Amazon charge the same thing. But in your mind, "Right now Apple is overtaxing just because it is not possible to compete with native app in the browser."

REALLY!!!! What about Wikipedia definition: the word racket is used to describe a business (or syndicate) that is based on the example of the protection racket and indicates a belief that it is engaged in the sale of a solution to a problem that the institution itself creates or perpetuates, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage. Apple creates the problem (ban Flash in the browser), offers the solution (native app), tax money (30%), that's a match to me.

The part that you gloss over is where a racket involves an illegal business. Apple banning the Flash plugin is not illegal. And the relationship that you describe between Flash apps and native apps is laughable. Especially when you consider that competing platforms charge the same price despite the availability of Flash apps.
 
Especially when you consider that competing platforms charge the same price despite the availability of Flash apps.

Yup. Again, just like I've asked earlier flexengineer, why don't you post the same "30% sucks, web apps rule!" comment in an Android forum and see what kind of responses you get? Might as well try it on Windows Phone 7 and Blackberry forums too. Those people have no allegiance to Apple.
 
why don't you post the same "30% sucks, web apps rule!" comment in an Android forum and see what kind of responses you get? Might as well try it on Windows Phone 7 and Blackberry forums too. Those people have no allegiance to Apple.

Because Google does not ban Flash in the browser to impose their 30% tax and they have no reason not to align on Apple AppStore.

Microsoft is about to enter big with Nokia, no matter what games Microsoft is playing with Apple I know for fact Windows mobile will support Flash in the browser and I know for fact Nokia hired some of the best Flash rocket scientists in the country. You know Nokia market share and penetration, right?

RIM (BlackBerry) supports Flash in the browser and baked AIR into the OS for Playbook, as a matter of fact only Flash apps could be added to the store prior to release! They showed their browser loading Flash beautifully, as well as HTML5. just youtube it!

All those companies do not impose their tax, we are free to do it in the browser. Only Apple pushes the racket on us. Actually, on you cause we will just pass the extra cost to you end user or we will stay out of iOS like Rhapsody and Amazon and ignore iOS users all at once.
 
Last edited:
All those people do not impose their tax, we are free to do it in the browser. Only Apple pushes the racket on us.

Wait, aren't they all blocking out Silverlight? So by your definition, Silverlight developers should complain all those people are imposing tax and doing bad things, right?

But my point is that since you keep claiming this "web apps will rule!" thing, give me a proof. We already know you have absolutely no evidence of Flash apps and games being used widely in Android instead of native apps.(the fact says the opposite) So let's do some popularity test for the future gazing. Go ask those Android users, who you claim will use web apps, if they'll ditch native apps in order to avoid paying "megalomaniac" tax. So far you've been making claims without anything to back up your prediction of Flex domination, so at least show us how Android users see the situation. Fair enough?

Oh and you keep bringing up Rhapsody and Amazon. Get this: they are the precisely the types of middlemen who charge "taxes" to content providers. The reason they are complaining is because they are middlemen and charging "tax" as you claim, is already built into their business model, which makes them Apple competitors to an extent.
 
So far you've been making claims without anything to back up your prediction of Flex domination, so at least show us how Android users see the situation. Fair enough?

Yes fair enough, it is with pleasure that I will come back here, quote you and show it to you since you need to see (common sense is suffisant really). Let me find those apps since I am not on Android, I use iPhone, and I have refused every single mobile project until I get to deploy everywhere, which comes with AIR 2.6 2 weeks ago. I can tell you one thing, T-Mobile is coming with something huge entirely based on Flex 4.5 which is still beta, hundreds of developers around the world. Wait until that comes out!

Once again, it is my job, I am an expert in Flash Platform, I get every single job opening on my desk, every single contract, I can guarantee you, Flash Platform is becoming huge, half of Silicon Valley has been packing Flex developers for months if not years (with web), half Wall Street does the same (I know you do not care but that's propbably why Apple does so good with businesses...). I already posted a list of all the companies... I cant just go on and on for ever... Quickbook is one! The online version is in Flex, they are in Montain View and are recruiting crazy... What else, I said Amazon, I said BBC Player I duno if it is native or not, HP, Motorolla, CNN, Cysco... You will see it soon enough.

Keep talking, I will come back soon enough.
 
Last edited:
Wait until that comes out!
Sure, I'm interested to see how the mobile world will change too.

Once again, it is my job, I am an expert in Flash Platform,

Look, I don't think you are a troll. It's just, it seems to me, maybe because you're such an expert of the platform, you have more allegiance to it than you personally realize. We are not questioning your ability as a Flash developer, we're questioning whether you actually have solid evidence to back your grand claims. So far all you keep saying is basically "Apple is evil. Web apps will rule. Trust me I'm a Flash expert, it'll happen." Since you have no evidence, I ask you for some concrete examples or even online community responses, but your answer is always "I'm a Flash expert. I know this."

I'm an Android user who also read Android forums and most Android communities have absolutely no interest in Flash web apps. If it's going to be as big as you claim it'll be, I'd think there'll be some serious hype in the user base, especially in technically inclined onlinee communities like Android forums. However so far, I haven't really seen anything that warrants your enthusiasm for the future prospect of Flash-based web apps.

Keep talking, I will come back soon enough.

Actually without you here, nobody will talk about web apps. People will mostly argue about whether being able to watch Daily Show is worth it or not. You're pretty much the only Flex evangelist I see here, or even in Android forums.
 
Last edited:
Look, I don't think you are a troll. It's just, it seems to me, maybe because you're such an expert of the platform, you have more allegiance to it than you personally realize. We are not questioning your ability as a Flash developer, we're questioning whether you actually have solid evidence to back your grand claims.

My claims are based on common sense and insider knowledge, it's either you believe me or you do not, as I said many time it is all going to really hit in Spring 2011, it's a round the corner. Let's just peace out for a bit and see what's happening. I have been very consistent since December 2010 on this thread and another much longer on the iPhone forums. If you go back into that thread you will see that so far it is happening the way I believed it would. Am I a psychic? No, I will probably make mistake but I am damn good at what I do and I know enough about any significant technologies used to build applications and the main players. I know the market, I know the tech, I know the business aspect of it and once again I strongly believe that Flex and AIR will be to mobile what Flash was to the web, the most widespread because the best at it period.

I'm an Android user who also read Android forums and most Android communities have absolutely no interest in Flash web apps.

Because they are not up to date, because the first mobile version of Flex is still a beta (not for much longer tho), because Flash only exist on mobile since July 2010 and because AIR 2.6 was just released 2 weeks ago and is the first time we can leverage all the latest features of both iOS and Android and the first time that we can push one app to all platform including iOS, because Flash 10.2 optimized for mobile just came out, because the Adobe Flash certified devices are just coming out now. Before that, building an app for both iOS and Android natively would have taken up to 200% the time it now takes with AIR 2.6, it is going to be a tsunami of AIR and Flex apps, you will no even know it maybe because they will behave exactly the same as native apps except they will play everywhere else including web and TV.

It is from now on that the change will happen and I am sorry if most Android developers wait the official releases to assess technology. I have been part of every single pre release, alpha and beta program for Flex, AIR and Flash Media Server for the last 7 or 8 years so I pretty much know it all and have tested it all a year ahead of public release.

But who cares about all of that, the matter is whether or not Apple surcharges its customers, manipulates markets and made an habit out of it for years, using monopoly or market advance to maintain power, there was iTunes / Mac / Real six years ago, now it is AppStore / iOS / Flash...
 
Last edited:
My claims are based on common sense and insider knowledge, it's either you believe me or you do not, as I said many time it is all going to really hit in Spring 2011, it's a round the corner.

:D Kinda like the Flash Player. It's always the version right around the corner that will fix everything.

Let's just peace out for a bit and see what's happening. I have been very consistent since December 2010 on this thread and another much longer on the iPhone forums. If you go back into that thread you will see that so far it is happening the way I believed it would.

:) What predictions have you made in either of these threads that have subsequently come to pass?
 
:D Kinda like the Flash Player. It's always the version right around the corner that will fix everything

Will laugh hard who will laugh last, by the way AIR now (not tomorrow, now as of February 2011) allows Flash apps to be deployed on 85 million devices, and the new estimate from Adobe is 200 million by the end of 2011, I remember you getting on my case for days with the Flash enabled numbers:

Mobile Adoption of Adobe Flash Platform in 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzogeajxKzM&NR

All you can blame me for is maybe being always a couple months ahead in what I say, denying Flash Platform momentum is not going to change anything about it.
 
Last edited:
It would be nice, but now that I have an excellent Galaxy Tab with flash, I don't care whats on my iPad 2.
 
Will laugh hard who will laugh last, by the way AIR now (not tomorrow, now as of February 2011) allows Flash apps to be deployed on 85 million devices, and the new estimate from Adobe is 200 million by the end of 2011, I remember you getting on my case for days with the Flash enabled numbers:

Mobile Adoption of Adobe Flash Platform in 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzogeajxKzM&NR

Which has absolutely nothing to do with what I said.

All you can blame me for is maybe being always a couple months ahead in what I say, denying Flash Platform momentum is not going to change anything about it.

You don't even remember what you said. The new numbers don't make your previous statement that I "got on your case" about true either. A couple of months or even a couple of years won't change that.

EDIT: Actually, the estimate of 132 million came after the video that you posted. So Adobe has cut their estimate by 34% within a couple months. Sounds like they are not as confident as you are.

Let's just peace out for a bit and see what's happening. I have been very consistent since December 2010 on this thread and another much longer on the iPhone forums. If you go back into that thread you will see that so far it is happening the way I believed it would.

What predictions have you made in either of these threads that have subsequently come to pass?
 
Last edited:
The idea that paid in-browser apps will beat the App Stores/Markets is very hard to believe. I've bought a whole bunch of Apps and games from small companies. There is no way I'd have bought those if I had to give my credit card number separately to each company. App Stores/Markets are just much more convenient and much up with users expectations. Users expect to get Apps through an App Store/Market and they expect to get web pages when they use a browser.

The situation for ad-supported apps is different but there are still advantages to going through the App Store. A big one is that for $99 a year Apple will host your app and allow it to be downloaded an unlimited number of years. If you end up with a hit that could be a really big cost saving.
 
The idea that paid in-browser apps will beat the App Stores/Markets is very hard to believe.

I agree. If anything they are moving away from in-browser to apps. We know that people like using curated app stores/markets for all the reasons blackNBUK stated

Also unlike flexengineer's assertion, developers do not pass 30% to consumers. They absorb that since any revenue from app stores is an added profit without any significant fixed cost. They get 70% of $1 instead of 100% of $0. Why would they have to add extra? The error made by flexengineer is his assumption that consumers are just as likely to use web apps as they are to use native apps from curated stores, which so far has been clearly demonstrated to be false.

Moreover, based on his assumption, he goes on a tirade against Apple for excluding his choice of development platform and complains about the 30% "tax," while giving free passes to Google, Blackberry, Microsoft and Amazon even though they are all charging the 30% "tax," as well. Because, well, you know they support Flash! If I'm a Silverlight developer, I should be very mad about all this too? Why is he not supporting other platforms like Silverlight and Qt?

At the same time, he doesn't say anything about Apple's enthusiasm on HTML5 even though if Apple is an evil entity like he claims Apple won't support HTML5 either. Because that'll invalidate his argument. I never knew relying on a single corporate development tool for development across all platforms is the key to consumer freedom. To me it's almost as ludicrous as some online claims of Microsoft Windows being an "open" platform.

He might be a tech expert but so far he hasn't backed up any of his idea in doing business with any evidence. He just keeps giving us Adobe promotion material and tech demos, none of which looks particularly impressive. Also if he's really that worried about consumer and developer freedom, he should be mad that others don't fully support HTML5 and Silverlight in their browsers as well, not just a single platform from which he makes his living off.
 
Last edited:
OMG, I rarely saw such a bunch of delusional people! You really live in the Apple microcosm and believe there is nothing outside of AppStore and iTunes, you are on for such a threat this year you have no idea! I can't argue with you because I can't prove what I say and what I know, so when it will become public and I will be free to talk about it I will come here and call you all on it, until then I bail out!

Baldminac, it's 200 million, remember when we argued and I said the numbers do not add up and you accused me to sidetrack to avouid admitting I am wrong, remember? Well, the reason is that Adobe successed in forcing Flash to iOS therough AIR so it's not 20 million devices we can put Flash on bu 85 million as of today, and 200 million by the end of the year.

My battle is over, my Flash apps get on iPad and iPhone period, the rest is up to the consumers to vote with their wallets because they get screwed, I don't care, I will pass the 30% tax to the consumers on iOS for any app I should be able to run in the browser and can't, let's see how many of us developers and publishers decide to do so. Trust me, you are going to cry this year watching your world collapse!
 
Last edited:
You can say what you want, APPLE USERS WILL PAY MORE FOR THE SAME EXACT FLASH APPLICATIONS ON IOS AS NATIVE APPS BECAUSE WE WILL PASS APPLE 30% TAX TO END USER, NO ONE WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR APPLE 30% IN THE BROWSER. Developers already made their choice, there are 3 million flash developers, how many iOS developers? 100k? lol

Apple tied us up for a year, now it is showtime, keep talking!

i don't see Joe Public buying random apps in a browser on a phone/tablet for the simple fact that they won't trust it, people are hesitant to give card details out online these days due to fraud. plus alot of people will not go outside of their device's built in ecosystem, such as androids marketplace, apple's app store, etc.

This has now seemingly been confirmed with Last.fm co-founder Richard Jones saying Apple has “****ed over” music subscription services (read the chatlogs here), in preparation for the launch of their own competing service which, of course, will not be subject to the 30% levy.

And Apple's users will pay more for the same exact Flash apps until Apple allows Flash in the browsers on iOS.

not being funny, but Last.FM were screwing their users over anyway by pulling streaming over 3G unless you paid, as up until recently you could stream for free, so they're prob just in a stink cos of the kerfuffle that caused.

Really? you think Android users will be using more in-browser apps than native apps by the end of this year? :eek:

exactly, they won't, they won't know and won't care, if they want something, they'll get an app, simple as. that's why alot of web apps have now converted into native apps. he's a bit deluded in that sense.

Ok, now address the part of my post where I argued this won't have the consequences you think it will.

he won't, that's the funny part, he'll ignore it and change the subject. He still hasn't commented on my point that Amazon will release a native app for iOS at some point by the end of they year, they won't cut their nose off to spite their faces. they're making a song and dance about it now to make a point, but will eventually release one by the end of the year and they'll then make a point about it saying, look we're so nice we're not gonna penalise iOS users. it's all just a marketing ploy.

I don't think people in this thread, inluding me, really understood the extent of his claim.

Basically he's telling us Adobe Flex will destroy all the curated app store/markets on platforms with (eventual) Flash support such as Android market, Blackberry app world, Microsoft marketplace, Amazon app store, etc, because users are smart enough not to pay %30 "tax" and will use the web apps instead. Only iOS users will be forced to pay more for native apps while all other platform users will be enjoying web based apps without going through a centralized store that charges developers.

I mean, there are some credible reasons to enable Flash but that claim is just ...wow.. it is the first time I actually really felt a tinge of amazement from a religious evangelicism. ( ok k that was an exaggeration ;) )

exactly, that's the most absurd comment i read today lol.

If Flash doesn't die, Apple will have made a big mistake. I often come across Flash videos that don't work. The Huffington Post uses videos from various sources and 75% of them don't work. The Daily Show episodes don't work. Episodes of The Office don't work. HBO.com doesn't work. Essentially every live stream, including Whitehouse.gov, doesn't work. I had to watch the World Cup on my Droid while waiting at the airport. Please don't tell me Flash is hardly used. I run across something every other day that can't be played.

no-one said flash is hardly used, they, and i, were saying that we've had no problems in our experiences and neither has Joe Public, otherwise there would be more kerfuffle about it other than on niche forums.

I said, you said... that is a typical technique you have been using to dissolve the conversation. This is the subject in hand now, can we focus on it?

the funny thing is, you keep saying how people keep dissolving the conversation when really it's you doing that, by ignoring valid points and valid questions to what you have posted. you've either changed subject or blatantly ignored it.

Keep talking guys, the poll was stuck at 55% for 2 days and has been going up ever since you all got on my case like pirhanas. This thread was clean and enjoyable until you arrived (Baldimac has been following me like a shadow here and on another thread). I am tired, I will come back when there is news to post, which will be probably tomorrow or tonight arounf 11pm when I get the articles of the day. You are amusing people, you really are but this is an endless fight so keep talking... I said everything I had to say so if you have a question for me just read the thread again you will find the answer.

again, this poll means squat in the grand scheme of things, this is a niche forum, at best making up 5% of all iOS users. the other 95% don't know or dont care what flash is or understand what it does, so even if the poll was 98% on your side, that still doesn't mean anything. as for your clean and enjoyable comment, that's absurd, you've just gotten annoyed with the fact you've been challenged on things where you can't admit you're not right.

Google and Amazon do not ban Flash in the browser to impose their 30% tax and they have no reason not to align on Apple AppStore.

lol so you're saying that apple banned flash just for that? i take back what i said earlier, this is the funniest thing i've heard today. they're not interconnected ideas. you've just pulled at 2 random things and put them together to make it look like you have a point.

Microsoft is about to enter big with Nokia, no matter what games Microsoft is playing with Apple I know for fact Windows mobile will support Flash in the browser and I know for fact Nokia hired some of the best Flash rocket scientists in the country. You know Nokia market share and penetration, right?

lol Nokia? the reason they have the share and penetration they have is simply due to the fact they run off so many different models and a high majority are given away free on contract or sold cheap on pay and go, that's it. if all phones were free or the same price i bet there'd be a different story on marketshare and penetration.

I said BBC Player I duno if it is native or not

the BBC iPlayer has worked on the iPhone since day of launch, they made an iOS friendly version and made an iPad version when that came out and released, both as webapps, then they brought out a native app. So really, using them in your argument is futile, they fully support iOS.

The idea that paid in-browser apps will beat the App Stores/Markets is very hard to believe. I've bought a whole bunch of Apps and games from small companies. There is no way I'd have bought those if I had to give my credit card number separately to each company. App Stores/Markets are just much more convenient and much up with users expectations. Users expect to get Apps through an App Store/Market and they expect to get web pages when they use a browser.

You hit the nail on the head there. that's why he's wrong about flash web apps on mobile devices

OMG, I rarely saw such a bunch of delusional people! You really live in the Apple microcosm and believe there is nothing outside of AppStore and iTunes, you are on for such a threat you have no idea! I can't argue with you because I can't prove what I say and what I know, so when it will become public and I will be free to talk about it I will come here and call you all on it, until then I bail out!

lol we're just stating fact. you're the one in the bubble thinking apple are evil and that the general user will think what you do. If you noticed what i said, i also said general android users will not buy random web apps outside of the android market place, same with blackberry users and windows phone 7 users.

you can't argue with us cos you know we actually have points based in real life facts.......
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lol we're just stating fact. you're the one in the bubble thinking apple are evil and that the general user will think what you do. If you noticed what i said, i also said general android users will not buy random web apps outside of the android market place, same with blackberry users and windows phone 7 users.

you can't argue with us cos you know we actually have points based in real life facts.......

I dont give a damn about your AppStore, I work for clients like Amazon, Netflix, VH1, big companies and big media publishers that do not give a damn about Apple, do not need Apple to sell their ****, especially subscription, content subscription is something I do not need Apple for, my clients are giants with their own distribution systems and they all say "GO SCREW YOURSELF" to the 30% tax so watch throughout 2011 how AppStore will be treated as a second class store, we are going to build for Android first, and update Android first, let's see how long Apple's customers are going to take before to be tired for being treated as second class citizens just because they use an iOS and Steve Jobs is having personal issues with Flash. I do not care what you say they will do or not, I know enough for myself please for the love of god just believe me or don't and move on, all you are doing if making the poll go up by the hour.
 
OMG, I rarely saw such a bunch of delusional people! You really live in the Apple microcosm and believe there is nothing outside of AppStore and iTunes

Not really. There's always Cydia! ;-)

You are arguing "many developers are going to use Flex. It's amazing. People will use web apps" However there's one critical error in your argument: Success of Flex as a development tool does not equal platform moving toward web apps.

You can talk about your insider knowledge until cows come home but fact is fact. The fact says almost every platform is moving towards curated app store/market model where the curator gets a cut, usually 30%. At one point there was no market for iOS, Android, Windows Mobile, Symbian, Blackberry, etc. Now they all have app stores and even desktop OSs are now getting them. It doesn't matter what they use to make the apps, people like using curated apps and developers are refusing to charge "tax" to end users because app stores encourage people to buy more apps which more than makes up for the cut.

It doesn't matter what development tool you use. You simply have nothing to back up your claim of web app taking over the world and in fact the fact tells us the exactly the opposite. Flex might be the greatest developmental tool ever seen, but does that mean people will ditch app stores for web apps.

And again, if you're so enthusiastic about freeing up people from corporate control, why are you so willing to submit yourself to another corporate control? (Adobe) You should be mad at HTML5, Silverlight and Qt not getting all the access in the world too. Otherwise you're just shilling for the platform that your business is based on.


I dont give a damn about your AppStore, I work for clients like Amazon, Netflix, VH1, big companies and big media publishers that do not give a damn about Apple, do not need Apple to sell their ****, especially subscription, content subscription is something I do not need Apple for, my clients are giants with their own distribution systems and they all say "GO SCREW YOURSELF"

Because all the companies you listed are all basically middlemen whose business model is charging "tax" like you said?
 
And again, if you're so enthusiastic about freeing up people from corporate control, why are you so willing to submit yourself to another corporate control? (Adobe) You should be mad at HTML5, Silverlight and Qt not getting all the access in the world too. Otherwise you're just shilling for the platform that your business is based on.




Because all the companies you listed are all basically middlemen whose business model is charging "tax" like you said?

Will laugh hard who will laugh last, keep talking, more material I will be able to call you on and quote all year long.
 
I dont give a damn about your AppStore, I work for clients like Amazon, Netflix, VH1, big companies and big media publishers that do not give a damn about Apple, do not need Apple to sell their ****, especially subscription, content subscription is something I do not need Apple for, my clients are giants with their own distribution systems and they all say "GO SCREW YOURSELF" to the 30% tax so watch throughout 2011 how AppStore will be treated as a second class store, we are going to build for Android first, and update Android first, let's see how long Apple's customers are going to take before to be tired for being treated as second class citizens just because they use an iOS and Steve Jobs is having personal issues with Flash. I do not care what you say they will do or not, I know enough for myself please for the love of god just believe me or don't and move on, all you are doing if making the poll go up by the hour.

haha again you focus on apple when i pointed out android, windows phone 7 and blackberry users will all focus on their relevant app stores and you go on a hysterical rant about apple and their 30% tax, which as other people have said, all other app stores/marketplace also do.... you're really embarrassing yourself now.

Plus iOS users are patient, as i have stated, amazon will release a native cloud player app for iOS by the end of the year, partly cos people will question amazon for one or stop using sound cloud for not supporting it and partly cos they will milk the publicity of not having it at launch and then for saying "look at us, we won't penalise people for having an iPhone". they'd be mad not to do it. look at other apps that started on android first and then expanded to iOS, it goes both ways too of course, iOS going to android.

again you fixate on the poll, which means NOTHING in the grand scheme of things, it's just a small percentage of users of a niche forum. they do not represent the average user, just keen technologically interested people.

Will laugh hard who will laugh last, keep talking, more material I will be able to call you on and quote all year long.

lol really? you're gonna sit here all year rehashing what we say? WOW you really need to get out more. i'm on here alot in this thread mostly due to being stuck in hospital. if you're so busy making flash in a pan as it's booming, how can you spend so much time on here...
 
Will laugh hard who will laugh last, keep talking, more material I will be able to call you on and quote all year long.

Please, let's not get into a pissing match. Just answer me on the topic. Am I wrong or right on calling "Amazon, Netflix, VH1, big companies and big media publishers" middlemen whose business model relies on getting cut? You've earlier asserted something about apps and games being more expensive on iOS, but those companies are content middlemen, not makers of apps and games in the usual sense.

You simply tell me whether I am wrong to make that distinction. Am I wrong in seeing those companies as middlemen for content publishing who have little to do with actual apps and games? Please just answer that question without going on a tangent.

WOW you really need to get out more. i'm on here alot in this thread mostly due to being stuck in hospital.

You make me feel bad. I often participate here with an iPad on my hands standing up while consoling my little wee one on a carrier. The baby has yet to learn my dark secrets though, I think ;)
 
Last edited:
Please, let's not get into a pissing match. Just answer me on the topic. Am I wrong or right on calling "Amazon, Netflix, VH1, big companies and big media publishers" middlemen whose business model relies on getting cut? You've earlier asserted something about apps and games being more expensive on iOS, but those companies are content middlemen, not makers of apps and games in the usual sense.

You simply tell me whether I am wrong to make that distinction. Am I wrong in seeing those companies as middlemen for content publishing who have little to do with actual apps and games? Please just answer that question without going on a tangent.

No they do not, not all and it is irrelevant anyway that is why I do not even answer your stupid questions but you cant help to drag me back into it and if I do not you lash trying to make me look bad so I am coming back.

IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW THEY MAKE THEIR MONEY
THEY DO NOT NEED APPLE TO CONDUCT BUSINESS
THEY WILL EITHER BYPASS IOS OR PASS THE TAX
THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO BEAT APPLE ON PRICING
THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT BUSINESS IN THE BROWSER

THE MARKET IS ORGANIZING ITSELF IN SUCH WAY THAT IOS USERS WILL GLOBALLY PAY MORE FOR APPS, MEDIA, ENTERTAINMENT INCLUDING MUSIC, MOVIES, MAGAZINES AND EVEN WONT GET SOME OF THEM AT ALL.

RAPHSODY DECIDES TO DROP ISO
AMAZON DROPPED IOS

AND MORE MUCH MORE WILL COME IN THE WEEKS MONTHS TO FOLLOW

That is all I have to say, so what's next? What is it you are going to use to dissolve the conversation? Did you go back and see how messy the thread became since you two illuminati arrived?

Gimme a break...
 
Last edited:
You make me feel bad. I often participate here with an iPad on my hands standing up while consoling my little wee one on a carrier. The baby has yet to learn my dark secrets though, I think ;)

you have a baby, that's a fair excuse, to be honest i was a little harsh with that comment, but the thought did occur to me that if the flash business is really that booming, he'd not have that much free time, i know i didn't when i was doing 3D animation for a few years, not the same business, but just as consuming.
 
No they do not, not all and it is irrelevant anyway that is why I do not even answer your stupid questions but you cant help to drag me back into it and if I do not you lash trying to make me look bad so I am coming back.

IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW THEY MAKE THEIR MONEY
THEY DO NOT NEED APPLE TO CONDUCT BUSINESS
THEY WILL EITHER BYPASS IOS OR PASS THE TAX
THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO BEAT APPLE ON PRICING
THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT BUSINESS IN THE BROWSER

Really? You mean Amazon, Netflix, etc do not get their money mainly out of passing on content made by others to customers and get cuts inbetween? Amazon must be doing something we aren't aware of them instead of charging "tax" to book buyers.

Speaking of Amazon. If I have a book, I can sell it directly from my website. Why do I pay "tax" and sell it through Amazon? Perhaps you can answer that question too while we are at it. You keep claim they will "PASS THE TAX" but where's the evidence?

THE MARKET IS ORGANIZING ITSELF IN SUCH WAY THAT IOS USERS WILL GLOBALLY PAY MORE FOR APPS, MEDIA, ENTERTAINMENT INCLUDING MUSIC, MOVIES, MAGAZINES AND EVEN WONT GET SOME OF THEM AT ALL.

RAPHSODY DECIDES TO DROP ISO
AMAZON DROPPED IOS

You surely know Apple prohibits developers from "PASSING THE TAX" to app store subscription consumers right?

And again, you're changing your subject. You were arguing apps and games moving to web apps. And now since you have no evidence on that front, you're using content middlemen like Rhapsody as your evidence on a different argument while not giving me any evidence on your earlier claim. Where are apps and games developers moving away from curated app stores to avoid paying "taxes"? You made the claim. Back it up, please don't try to change the subject.
 
Last edited:
Really? You mean Amazon, Netflix, etc do not get their money mainly out of passing on content made by others to customers and get cuts inbetween? Amazon must be doing something we aren't aware of them instead of charging "tax" to book buyers.

Speaking of Amazon. If I have a book, I can sell it directly from my website. Why do I pay "tax" and sell it through Amazon? Perhaps you can answer that question too while we are at it. You keep claim they will "PASS THE TAX" but where's the evidence? Also you surely know Apple prohibits developers from "PASSING THE TAX" to app store subscription consumers right?

It is irrelevant, the names are irrelevant, we are talking about 4 of the dozens if not hundreds of companies, just google "ipad subscription" NOT ONE SINGLE media beside the daily thingy has cut a deal and that's just for magazines, we see same with content distributor, Amazon is taking on Netflix, they do not pass the Apple in-app tax because they decided to bypass iOS all at once since it does not support Flash in the browser, they do not want this Apple control and they all are getting organized to make Apple swallow its dust, the same way Adobe did with the manufacturers. Site and watch, Steve Jobs overestimated itself and clearly underestimated the rest of the industry, a couple years ahead does not make Apple able to beat its entire industry organized to take it down for its arrogance and unfair, anti competitive practices.

THE MARKET IS ORGANIZING ITSELF IN SUCH WAY THAT IOS USERS WILL GLOBALLY PAY MORE FOR APPS, MEDIA, ENTERTAINMENT INCLUDING MUSIC, MOVIES, MAGAZINES AND EVEN WONT GET SOME OF THEM AT ALL.
 
lol again he's ignoring the valid point that the other app stores and market places have a 30% 'tax' that was pointed out earlier.

also still not shown me a flash game that is at the level of Infinity Blade.

also cannot acknowledge that this forum consists of a niche audience that is not representative of iOS or any other mobile/tablet or even computer OS.

No valid response to the extremely valid point that people will not go outside their devices respective ecosystem to buy some webapp over using a marketplace/app store to buy a native one.

cannot accept that Amazon are milking the publicity by their actions which they will backtrack on as they will not cut out potential customers.

there's just some points he's avoided so far without even looking back and now he claims we've ruined the thread because his argument has started to become flaky...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.