A 3-year sentence under the circumstances seems entirely appropriate to me. The people this guy was scamming were not the rich and powerful; they were the ones desperate enough to believe the "Apple" tweet (etc.) might be real.Yeah this is overkill. I mean it’s already quite clear that the US legal system is a joke but this is a little over the top considering there are mothers out there who abused/killed their children and they got off lighter than this guy.
This sounds like an argument for stricter sentences for drunk drivers involved in homicides rather than an argument for a more lenient sentence for one who tricks vulnerable people into sending him money.Poor Kid!
Here in Germany a driver killed a 19y old girl. He was drunk, drove a car, then hit her...
Long story short, all he got was a 5000€ fine, and could even keep his driving license. Probably not much different in the US.
And a Twitter Hacker, lol - A HACKER, better call him Scammer, get 3ys.
He won't spend 3 years. He will be luckily to spend 1/2 of that in jail.Yeah this is overkill. I mean it’s already quite clear that the US legal system is a joke but this is a little over the top considering there are mothers out there who abused/killed their children and they got off lighter than this guy.
no cyber security company would plague themselves with that. it takes little knowledge to phish.Id honestly rather see them get hired by a cyber security company. Put their talent to good use.
Most cyber security companies probably prefer to employ people meeting basic moral standards.Id honestly rather see them get hired by a cyber security company. Put their talent to good use.
I’m coming to steal your TV and it will be your fault for having ****** door locks.Doesn’t make sense. It’s Twitters fault for having such weak security and blame Jack for encouraging people to believe in ***** coins and lawless libertarian fantasies.
Yes. But just getting an interview at these companies can be impossible.Someone needs to tell these kids before they do stupid stuff, that there are plenty of tech companies that would happily employ them for their expertise in these matters.
Absolutely unemployable. You can’t trust someone like this. And being able to protect things is totally different from breaking things.Id honestly rather see them get hired by a cyber security company. Put their talent to good use.
Heh "companies" and "moral" in the same sentence, find the error.Most cyber security companies probably prefer to employ people meeting basic moral standards.
Reminds me of a website "please rob my house" or was it "please rob me", dunno anymore.I’m coming to steal your TV and it will be your fault for having ****** door locks.
Your logic is flawed.
But if you’re actually serious, and you don’t think that spending three years between the ages of 17 and 20, away from computers,between jail and Boot Camp will change a person, then maybe you should spend three years in jail or Boot Camp. Because I guarantee you, especially between 17 and 20, that will change you.I disagree, take it away. He began his adult life as a scammer - that’s the kind of personality that is a plague upon society. They actively prey upon the rest of us, forcing us to spend an inordinate amount of effort to protect ourselves from them. Literally everything in your life is affected and reflected in the price paid by the end user of every good and service you buy (loss prevention, cyber security, etc.). We don’t catch many of these people. Those that do need to be held accountable. Some 17 year old punk isn’t going to learn **** by the time he’s 20.
Don't think so. But hacking into other people's Twitter accounts is considered hacking 😁Honest question, is phishing now considered as hacking?
and then there's politicians and bankers ;(Yeah this is overkill. I mean it’s already quite clear that the US legal system is a joke but this is a little over the top considering there are mothers out there who abused/killed their children and they got off lighter than this guy.
Trustworthiness is more important than talent when it comes to hiring. That kid in Australia who hacked Apple itself didn't get a job at Apple either. The message I got when I was a kid with a knack for cracking systems was that crime won't land you a job. You'd even get an F on a security class project if you ingeniously hacked the VM they handed you to get around the actual hacking exercises inside it. Plus punishment for academic dishonesty.Id honestly rather see them get hired by a cyber security company. Put their talent to good use.
For all we know, it could've been the hackers sending themselves money. Though, I have no idea why they'd do that. Maybe makes it look more believable?this might be the wrong takeaway but who the hell falls for a trillion-dollar corporation saying they'd double your bitcoin? i mean come on