Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Don't care for Samsung but I like the fact Apple gets competition from a myriad of companies. In the end we all benefit from it.
I just wished Samsung was more original and come up with ground breaking ideas and not copy so much.


Yeah, I know what you mean. I can't believe Samsung had the nerve to release a phone with a 5+ inch screen a couple years back. Even though the Apple folks said that people hated big phones. :rolleyes:
 
All Samsung needs to do

Is focus less on quality and more on marketing spin and release a bendable and hackable phone and they will be back on track for profit their mobile division.
 
and they wont eat in to Apple's China position, why? Remember Apple is now the No 1 smartphone provider in China?

Xiaomi will definitely slow the growth of the iPhone in China. In China you will be able to buy an iPhone or an Xiaomi phone for half the price that is designed to look very similar to the iPhone. I'm sure both companies will sell a ton. Samsung can't produce an exact copy of the iPhone because it can't sell that copy in jurisdictions with enforced IP laws. And also Apple can sue Samsung in the U.S. and go after assets located outside China or S. Korea.
 
The entire thing... is a rip-off of iOS. Conveniently forgot that one, huh? Making the screen bigger is not some major innovation, it's just something users wanted. In the year it's been out, I have not seen a single S5 in the wild, and still not a single Note 4. Samsung made a big screen first. BIG DEAL. They also put in a bunch of gimmicks that have no use. Notice how Apple never copied that silly air-swipe.
It's not a ripoff but keep thinking that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apple killed Samsung. Fanboys rejoice :eek:

I think it's more than just Apple killing Samsung...

Yes, Apple is doing better than Samsung but I don't think Samsung is going away anytime soon.

I am pretty tired of hearing about Samsung on Apple websites:rolleyes:. I think MacRumors should save it until there is something more directly related to Apple to report
 
Apple may design the chips themselves, but the actual production of the chips is mostly done by Samsung (with TSMC sometimes producing some of them - it's been repeatedly rumored that TSMC will take over the majority of production but I don't think that's ever come to pass.)

TSMC is the main producer for the IPHONE 6 A8 and A8X... Where have you been?

Good grief!

Samsung is rumored to be the producer of the A9, but that's not a given yet since the rumor has flipped between Samsung and TSMC a few time in the last few months.
 
The entire thing... is a rip-off of iOS. Conveniently forgot that one, huh? Making the screen bigger is not some major innovation, it's just something users wanted. In the year it's been out, I have not seen a single S5 in the wild, and still not a single Note 4. Samsung made a big screen first. BIG DEAL. They also put in a bunch of gimmicks that have no use. Notice how Apple never copied that silly air-swipe.

People sometimes forget about the older Galaxy phones:
Samsung-Galaxy-S-iPhone-Copy.jpg

There is a good reason Apple took them to court
 
You mean just like how Apple has totally and utterly followed and ripped off the Android market by producing a phablet then? Oh yeah, you'll all conveniently forget that one right?

I doubt going to a large screen size had anything to do with stealing. They wanted to solve issues with using a larger screen before shipping. Such as using the larger screen one handed. Their solution was to use "Adaptive UI" where the screen drops down so your thumb can reach it. Along with not wanting to fragment iOS for developers for different screen sizes.
 
Last I checked, competition was good. And that there was plenty of marketshare to go around with more than only one company being able to be successful.

I really don't care to live in a world where any one tech company is the only one.

Competition is good when a product is not commoditized so much that there is no profit left for innovation, just production. The current traditional PC industry has been there for quite some time. In most industry, innovations is slow to null. Often, you need to break out a whole new category to get a great innovation rush, : wearables, internet of things, driverless cars, low cost space travel, etc.
 
And yet, they look nothing alike. Go figure.

You are just trolling or joking? Does the word "nothing" mean something different where you live? Saying "they look nothing alike" is just dishonest and makes one look like a silly goose. Sorry to tell you, but there are a lot of similarities in those old phones. Too many similarities to ignore.

No one said that the Galaxy S was a 100% clone of the iPhone, or that one could not tell the difference. I do say it looks like Samsung copied Apple pretty heavily.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Talking about apple copying for making a bigger phone is weak. The size of the screen is really a special design feature? Here are some real game changers that were copied by Google / Samsung:

-The App Store
-The full screen touch interface (look at apples argument of Samsung phones before and after the iPhone). That is hands down the biggest innovation to date.
-Touch ID

How does the size of the screen even compare to those. Did every company who was not the first, but made an 80 inch tv "copy" a crucial design of the first one??

Apple made a large screen way before everyone else. It was a year before "tablets" TRIED to completely copy the iPad.

Very weak argument. Larger screens came long before phones. Like TV's and monitors.
 
Saying "they look nothing alike" is just dishonest. Sorry to tell you, but there are a lot of similarities in those old phones. Too many similarities to ignore.

No one said that the Galaxy S was a 100% clone of the iPhone, or that one could not tell the difference. I do say it looks like Samsung copied Apple pretty heavily.
Sorry to tell you, but they look nothing alike.


No one said that the Galaxy S was a 100% clone of the iPhone, or that one could not tell the difference.
Sorry but this is not true in anyway, many people have claimed this and on forums just like this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's not surprising when you consider that Apple eliminated the one and only advantage that Samsung had: BIG ASS PHONES, which happen to have longer battery because they're so big.

That being said, I'm definitely downsizing from the 6 Plus to the 6S later this year.
 
Sorry to tell you, but they look nothing alike.
Do I have to list the similarities? Sorry to have to break this to you buddy: They look something alike.

Sorry but this is not true in anyway, many people have claimed this and on forums just like this.
I am referring to your post that quoted me. I am not speaking for EVERYONE who has EVER posted about this. I am saying the phones are not 100% alike, anyone who says the Galaxy S is a perfect clone is just as foolish as someone who says they are nothing alike ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You mean just like how Apple has totally and utterly followed and ripped off the Android market by producing a phablet then? Oh yeah, you'll all conveniently forget that one right?

You're seriously going to argue that a bigger version of things already on the market is a rip-off? Or even some kind of real innovation that CAN be ripped off?

Let's not forget that Apple CREATED both the smart phone and the tablet markets, by themselves. Notice where the word "phablet" comes from?
 
You mean just like how Apple has totally and utterly followed and ripped off the Android market by producing a phablet then? Oh yeah, you'll all conveniently forget that one right?

I really don't think of size as a "feature" to be copied. If Apple had merely been copying, a "me too!" if you will, they would have fully upscaled their size along with other Android OEM's throughout the years. What they did instead was create two flagship phones with different sizes at the same time, with very little compromise between the two (I would say none, but ppi and lack of motion stabilizer).
 
What about flat UI? Widgets? Control Center? Notification Center? Third-party keyboards?

We were initially talking about larger screens.

Apple had widgets on its desktop ( Even before other desktop operating systems? ) long before them being on phones. Now its just expanding it to the mobile platform. I believe Android integrated control center & notifications, Apple made both separate.
 
Let's not forget that Apple CREATED both the smart phone and the tablet markets, by themselves.

There were smart phones before 2007 and tablets before 2010. Apple did not invent them, they just made better ones.

(I would argue that other companies have gone on and made better tablets since the iPad first came out.)
 
It looks like Samsung is pretty successful, and they are still selling more smartphones than Apple.

But unless you own Apple shares, please tell us how it improves YOUR life when Apple has a record quarter?

Whenever I read that Apple is stock-piling hundreds of billions of (largely un-taxed) dollars on some bank accounts, all I can think of is how much good could be done with that money if corporations were forced to make ethical decisions. 100 billion bucks could most likely bring forth a cure for cancer. It could build schools and provide education. There's no limit to what could be done with that money. All it does right now is sit on a bank account. And as I've said before, that's not even capitalistic - it's just capital that's not being used for anything useful, not even for their own product research or QA (and especially Apple's software QA could really need a boost).

And no, I'm not American. Neither am I a socialist. But this is just immoral.

Actually Winni, most of it is invested in securities. Primarily Apple buys long-term, highly-rated and highly-liquid securities issued by governments and other companies. I think it was $135 billion of their savings is in that form. So Apple takes its money and gives it to governments and other companies in return for bonds issued by those entities. Then those entities do what they will with the money. Apple keeps ten to twenty billion in bank accounts for working capital, but that is about it (though that is a huge amount).
 
Why is this article comparing Samsung Profit against Apple Income. What kind of twist are they trying to put on this, surely they should compare the profits or the income for both firms.
 
Yes, lets. None of the other companies paved the way FOR Apple to do what they did, nope, Apple did it ALL themselves. You really believe this drivel you spout?

LOL...Samsung\Android fans are angry.

I can't believe they are not hiding under a rock until the bad news goes away (that's what I would do if Apple reported such losses).

Gotta hand it to them, they are loyal troopers (but they would be more effective if they went to another section of this site to make up stories about how all the iPhones they own are bent).
 
Yes, lets. None of the other companies paved the way FOR Apple to do what they did, nope, Apple did it ALL themselves. You really believe this drivel you spout?

Calm down buddy. I'm not insulting your mother here.

But in all seriousness, obviously Apple didn't create the iPhone or the iPad in a vacuum, but "smartphones" before the iPhone were nothing like the iPhone while all smartphones being produced today are more or less exactly like the iPhone. It was a game changer. The consumer markets as they are today would not exist without the iPhone and the iPad.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.