Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It looks like Samsung is pretty successful, and they are still selling more smartphones than Apple.

Ahhhhhh ....

But unless you own Apple shares, please tell us how it improves YOUR life when Apple has a record quarter?

I'm a shareholder, yes. But even if I wasn't, Apple's record quarter would still improve my life. How?
Because I was there from the very beginning, from the family computing in the kitchen in an ad in OMNI magazine,
to walking into the Computer Lab of the University Of Miami in August 1980
and was confronted with row upon row of Apple][+es.
It's been a love affair ever since. And from the 90s to 2001 when we were getting kicked in the teeth
and were the laughing stock of the tech world, and now stand atop that self-same tech world,
that's how it improves my life: by living vicariously through Apple. By celebrating thier enormous success.

100 billion bucks could most likely bring forth a cure for cancer.
It could build schools and provide education.

Quatsch. There's been a cure for cancer for who knows how long, now.
But because it's more profitable to treat cancer than it is to cure it, the cure will never be made public until that's changed.
And as far a building schools goes, who needs buildings to accrue data?
You are probably holding the greatest university in the history of humanity right there in your hands.
It's called a net-connected iPad.
 
Last edited:
The issue was raised that the upcoming Galaxy S6 and Note 5 will give Samsung a boost in 2015.

I don't see that happening... considering Samsung's sales have already dropped despite flagships like the Galaxy S series and the Note series receiving yearly updates.

Basically... Samsung sold fewer phones in 2014 than they did in 2013... both for the Holiday quarter and the entire year. Clearly something is going on.

Do you think they will go up again?

Why not? Who knows what Samsung has to offer going forward, It is not beyond the realms that Apple may go down, e.g. more and more competitors in China and the US in 2015 / Initial surge of "big phone" demand subsides a little. We are likely 9 months from anything new from Apple whereas plenty of new HTC / Sony / Samsung /LG and others launching over the next months to eat into demand.

We just dont know, it all changes so dramatically. Two years ago, Samsung had stellar growth that no one could see ending, now they are dropping quickly. The thing is Samsung get 3 or 4 goes each year to try and change the trend, Apple typically gets one. Samsung has to get it right once, Apple has to get it right every single time?
 
But they brought all those things together, in a phone. Apple didn't event touch screens either, but it was still surprising they released a phone that was all screen and no keyboard.

Didn't some criticise it because of this?

Not least Blackberry!

I am not arguing that Apple don't have an impressive phone and I would certainly have a 6+ if I didn't have to carry round my company S4 [which is also fine], i.e. it is sad that folks carry more than one phone around!

Anyhow my point is that trends have a strange habit of changing dramatically, which is quite fortunate actually, since had the the growth of Elvis tributes continued to grow at the rate that it did between 1977 and 1981, by 2003 the whole world would have become Elvis tributes! [only joking]

----------

No. Why would you interpret it that way? In Samsung's best holiday quarter they sold more than Apple's best holiday quarter, but that's not what you're asking him to concede. Those "bests" came in different years. Samsung releases new phones in the spring, Apple in the fall. Apple's last quarter sales were up in 2014 compared to 2013. Samsung's were down in the same comparison.

Not arguing that point; facts are Apple has just released a phone in the Holiday quarter / Samsung has not, so the trend at this time may not reflect the trend in say 3 months time when Samsung do their launch. Apple is doing well. What I find odd, is that When Apple was in second place, this was sensational performance, now when it is basically a tied first, Samsung are suddenly doomed? Mobile is very important to Samsung [not quite as important as they are to Apple], so this idea that they are just going to wither away is ridiculous. I suspect by Summer roles will have reversed again; that is the real point I am trying to make. They are both going to dominate the space for some considerable time.
 
We need Samsung/HTC etc to be brilliant and push Apple. What incentive would Apple have to improve/innovate is there was no competition?

I think Xiaomi is likely to be the only to push them. Xiaomi is becoming amazingly competitive and it looks like they're aiming for full home integration. A smart home.
 
If there was no serious competition, Apple would just drip-feed improvements and bring new features at an even slower pace than they do right now.

The industry needs strong competition to force innovation.

I'm sure Apple is starting to feel the pressure now. Their flagship is being outdone by some other non-flagship products. More ram should have come much earlier and it still should be even more now.
 
It's not 100% clear... but it's a possibility.

Samsung actually dropped by about 3 million yearly units from 2013 to 2014... while Apple simultaneously went up by almost 40 million yearly units.

If that trajectory keeps up... we might see Apple overtake Samsung for the year eventually. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Not that it's a contest or anything :)




Samsung will undoubtedly launch new flagship phones this year... but it probably won't help their situation. I honestly don't think Samsung will get a boost from the upcoming Galaxy S6 or the Note 5.

They launched the Galaxy S4 and Note 3 in 2013... and their Holiday quarter was 86 million smartphones.

They launched the Galaxy S5 and Note 4 in 2014... but their Holiday quarter dropped to only 75 million smartphones.

So I don't see how a couple of new flagships in 2015 will reverse this downward slide.

Like I said earlier... Samsung already dropped unit sales YoY. I'm not sure how they will get those back.

Good points. But the Holiday quarter isn't that relevant for Samsung. It isn't a Holiday quarter for most of the world and most of their customers. And it isn't tied to the launch of their flagship phone the Galaxy S. What I'm curious about is the ability of the other manufacturers to continue to make high end Androids. I'm pretty sure that Samsung can still do it and put serious resources into it. Maybe HTC can on the strength of the One last year. But can the other manufacturers do it? If not, then maybe the GS6 sweeps up a larger percentage of the dwindling high end Android market.

----------

That's a weird theory. I'll just go with mine - when the iPhone was released, it was a great size for what it was supposed to do. Then the power of the devices became stronger and stronger, great productive and sophisticated gaming apps were developed, other apps as well - guitar pro and stuff, my fingers filled up the screen so a need for larger screen estate was the logical consequence. Steve said bla bla, at that point Steve's bla bla was fitting and correct, but then it became outdated by the tech he himself pushed... and that's pretty much it, imho.

The battery life on Androids was terrible (and in fact continue to be terrible, in that if you tried to run one on the battery in an iPhone it would fail in half a day) so they have to contain much much larger batteries than the iPhone. To have a large battery and remain thin they had to make them wider. Add in that they could not do the tight manufacturing that Apple can do, that also lead to them being wider. Remember there was and continues to be no high end androids made in the smaller form factor. It wasn't because they all figured out something that Apple didn't or refused to see. It is because once they put in the CPU to get the performance they needed to be high end and the battery they needed to run that CPU they were left with having to have a larger form factor.

Even last year, when they tried to make phones in about the same size as the iPhone 5s they had to gimp the CPU and the screen resolution. And Android's battery usage is a lot better than it was two or three years ago.
 
Erm? I just said that the other competitors are hitting Samsung, Apple has remained stagnant? How is that beating Samsung? When it's shipped units haven't changed. Apple competes in the worldwide market of smartphones.

Samsung shipped a lot of phones. Winner, winner, chicken dinner? Not. Profit is the keyword here. Something Samsung needs.

----------

I think Xiaomi is likely to be the only to push them. Xiaomi is becoming amazingly competitive and it looks like they're aiming for full home integration. A smart home.

Nope, until they have US retail operations gonna be a non-starter. I'm not buying a phone I can't replace in a half-hour.

In China, it's a different story, maybe home turf advantage, who yet knows.
 
I think Xiaomi is likely to be the only to push them. Xiaomi is becoming amazingly competitive and it looks like they're aiming for full home integration. A smart home.

But Xiaomi can only sell phones in countries that won't enforce IP rights. They cut costs by not paying for licensing and they copy all their design cues. They can't sell in bulk in the U.S. or Europe. Though it seems they will continue to eat into Samsung's position in China.
 
You mean just like how Apple has totally and utterly followed and ripped off the Android market by producing a phablet then? Oh yeah, you'll all conveniently forget that one right?

The entire thing... is a rip-off of iOS. Conveniently forgot that one, huh? Making the screen bigger is not some major innovation, it's just something users wanted. In the year it's been out, I have not seen a single S5 in the wild, and still not a single Note 4. Samsung made a big screen first. BIG DEAL. They also put in a bunch of gimmicks that have no use. Notice how Apple never copied that silly air-swipe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good points. But the Holiday quarter isn't that relevant for Samsung. It isn't a Holiday quarter for most of the world and most of their customers. And it isn't tied to the launch of their flagship phone the Galaxy S. What I'm curious about is the ability of the other manufacturers to continue to make high end Androids. I'm pretty sure that Samsung can still do it and put serious resources into it. Maybe HTC can on the strength of the One last year. But can the other manufacturers do it? If not, then maybe the GS6 sweeps up a larger percentage of the dwindling high end Android market.

----------



The battery life on Androids was terrible (and in fact continue to be terrible, in that if you tried to run one on the battery in an iPhone it would fail in half a day) so they have to contain much much larger batteries than the iPhone. To have a large battery and remain thin they had to make them wider. Add in that they could not do the tight manufacturing that Apple can do, that also lead to them being wider. Remember there was and continues to be no high end androids made in the smaller form factor. It wasn't because they all figured out something that Apple didn't or refused to see. It is because once they put in the CPU to get the performance they needed to be high end and the battery they needed to run that CPU they were left with having to have a larger form factor.

Even last year, when they tried to make phones in about the same size as the iPhone 5s they had to gimp the CPU and the screen resolution. And Android's battery usage is a lot better than it was two or three years ago.

The galaxy alpha has an exynos 8 core beast soc in it and it's going from memory thinner then any phone out with a tiny battery.
 
Remember, whilst Apple is making hay in China presently, Chinese manufacturers will soonn be making hay in Apples' (and Samsungs) traditional markets very soon. Whiost Apple has done well with 40% growth, some of these manufacturers have quadrupled their volumes this year. Samsung are seeing the impact of these manufacturers and no one, even Apple are going to be immune.

No doubt. I don't expect Apple to remain on top, but the fact they've built a strong ecosystem with their app store and, to a lesser extent, their Macs, I expect them to remain strong for a long time.
 
But Xiaomi can only sell phones in countries that won't enforce IP rights. They cut costs by not paying for licensing and they copy all their design cues. They can't sell in bulk in the U.S. or Europe. Though it seems they will continue to eat into Samsung's position in China.

and they wont eat in to Apple's China position, why? Remember Apple is now the No 1 smartphone provider in China?
 
Last edited:
Why not? Who knows what Samsung has to offer going forward, It is not beyond the realms that Apple may go down, e.g. more and more competitors in China and the US in 2015 / Initial surge of "big phone" demand subsides a little. We are likely 9 months from anything new from Apple whereas plenty of new HTC / Sony / Samsung /LG and others launching over the next months to eat into demand.

We just dont know, it all changes so dramatically. Two years ago, Samsung had stellar growth that no one could see ending, now they are dropping quickly. The thing is Samsung get 3 or 4 goes each year to try and change the trend, Apple typically gets one. Samsung has to get it right once, Apple has to get it right every single time?

Anyone that has owned a Samsung phone could see it coming. Their product quality is horrible. This is not Android bashing, it's Samsung bashing. They have a horrible product. I would seriously consider Android again, if it were a Nexus device. There's a reason it's the highest traded in device for the iPhone.
 
It looks like Samsung is pretty successful, and they are still selling more smartphones than Apple.

But unless you own Apple shares, please tell us how it improves YOUR life when Apple has a record quarter?

Whenever I read that Apple is stock-piling hundreds of billions of (largely un-taxed) dollars on some bank accounts, all I can think of is how much good could be done with that money if corporations were forced to make ethical decisions. 100 billion bucks could most likely bring forth a cure for cancer. It could build schools and provide education. There's no limit to what could be done with that money. All it does right now is sit on a bank account. And as I've said before, that's not even capitalistic - it's just capital that's not being used for anything useful, not even for their own product research or QA (and especially Apple's software QA could really need a boost).

And no, I'm not American. Neither am I a socialist. But this is just immoral.

As an American where innovation and design have a history moved offshore I'm glad an American company is producing a world-wide sensation. Mans sure Samsung is selling more smartphones than Apple, but it had a bad year. Sales units sold <> profits.

Also why do you care about US tax laws? While I'm not a fan of some of the tax laws, singling out Apple for doing what is essentially legal and does what every other corporate entity can do is misplaced. And are you aware Apple has philanthropic interests? As do other companies. That they don't gift it according to your requirements is your peeve, right?

And finally anybody can become a shareholder. As a company I like their philosophy better than others.
 
My guess is they've moved on to slightly less fanboyish sites to get their mobile news.


Seems like you'd be better off following them out the door, seeing as you take every opportunity you can to bash Apple- especially when there's good news about them.

And anyways, if you come to a website called MacRumors expecting to get unbiased "mobile news" coverage... you're barking up the wrong tree in the wrong forest.
 
Anyone that has owned a Samsung phone could see it coming. Their product quality is horrible. This is not Android bashing, it's Samsung bashing. They have a horrible product. I would seriously consider Android again, if it were a Nexus device. There's a reason it's the highest traded in device for the iPhone.

I have a S4, quality of build is perfectly fine? Frankly, it has never been in a case and is "as new" 12 months on. I openly admit, I wouldn't choose it as my phone if it wasn't the company issue. [I would have a 6+, because I like the look] I have a Sony Z ultra which is also excellent quality, although I use it as a tablet rather than a phone. I honestly and genuinely do not believe no one else is capable of Apples quality. Virtually every vendor now has very high quality products = equal in most regards. I would argue that Apple's products whilst high quality [very high], they are often not as durable and why 99% sit in hideous cases.
 
Before people go off on one, please remember the actual results of shipped phones worldwide by Samsung is much higher than Apple:

http://www.cnet.com/news/samsung-global-smartphone-share-falls-as-apples-remains-static/

In fact Apple has remained stagnant, Samsung has dropped, and all the other manufacturers have increased their numbers... Apple has a very long way to go to be worldwide number one.

And a continued drop in iPad sales is nothing to celebrate either. Apples big sales boost has come from China, the market it just entered. So if the chart in my link is anything to go by, it is other manufactures who have taken Samsungs share and not Apple.

Is this a backhanded way of saying "Apple is doomed"?

Apple is producing records profits and demand for the iPhone 6/6+ continues to be off the chart. Galaxy and Note, not so much. Apple took away Samdung's only strategic advantage, screen size. Samsung can win the "shipments" battle forever because it's meaningless.
As for the iPad, it's still the most desired tablet. It's more a like a desktop or laptop in that folks aren't going to replace it every 1 or 2 years.
You're really struggling hard to find a reason to pee on Apple's performance.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.