I never realized that before, and it's kind of hilarious, actually:
Samsung makes their own chips, but they don't even use them, instead selling them to Apple and buying Qualcomm's chips.
It looks like Samsung is pretty successful, and they are still selling more smartphones than Apple.
But unless you own Apple shares, please tell us how it improves YOUR life when Apple has a record quarter?
100 billion bucks could most likely bring forth a cure for cancer.
It could build schools and provide education.
The incentive is millions and millions of people buying improved phones.
The issue was raised that the upcoming Galaxy S6 and Note 5 will give Samsung a boost in 2015.
I don't see that happening... considering Samsung's sales have already dropped despite flagships like the Galaxy S series and the Note series receiving yearly updates.
Basically... Samsung sold fewer phones in 2014 than they did in 2013... both for the Holiday quarter and the entire year. Clearly something is going on.
Do you think they will go up again?
If there was no serious competition, Apple would just drip-feed improvements and bring new features at an even slower pace than they do right now.
But they brought all those things together, in a phone. Apple didn't event touch screens either, but it was still surprising they released a phone that was all screen and no keyboard.
Didn't some criticise it because of this?
No. Why would you interpret it that way? In Samsung's best holiday quarter they sold more than Apple's best holiday quarter, but that's not what you're asking him to concede. Those "bests" came in different years. Samsung releases new phones in the spring, Apple in the fall. Apple's last quarter sales were up in 2014 compared to 2013. Samsung's were down in the same comparison.
We need Samsung/HTC etc to be brilliant and push Apple. What incentive would Apple have to improve/innovate is there was no competition?
If there was no serious competition, Apple would just drip-feed improvements and bring new features at an even slower pace than they do right now.
The industry needs strong competition to force innovation.
It's not 100% clear... but it's a possibility.
Samsung actually dropped by about 3 million yearly units from 2013 to 2014... while Apple simultaneously went up by almost 40 million yearly units.
If that trajectory keeps up... we might see Apple overtake Samsung for the year eventually. It will be interesting to see what happens.
Not that it's a contest or anything
Samsung will undoubtedly launch new flagship phones this year... but it probably won't help their situation. I honestly don't think Samsung will get a boost from the upcoming Galaxy S6 or the Note 5.
They launched the Galaxy S4 and Note 3 in 2013... and their Holiday quarter was 86 million smartphones.
They launched the Galaxy S5 and Note 4 in 2014... but their Holiday quarter dropped to only 75 million smartphones.
So I don't see how a couple of new flagships in 2015 will reverse this downward slide.
Like I said earlier... Samsung already dropped unit sales YoY. I'm not sure how they will get those back.
That's a weird theory. I'll just go with mine - when the iPhone was released, it was a great size for what it was supposed to do. Then the power of the devices became stronger and stronger, great productive and sophisticated gaming apps were developed, other apps as well - guitar pro and stuff, my fingers filled up the screen so a need for larger screen estate was the logical consequence. Steve said bla bla, at that point Steve's bla bla was fitting and correct, but then it became outdated by the tech he himself pushed... and that's pretty much it, imho.
Erm? I just said that the other competitors are hitting Samsung, Apple has remained stagnant? How is that beating Samsung? When it's shipped units haven't changed. Apple competes in the worldwide market of smartphones.
I think Xiaomi is likely to be the only to push them. Xiaomi is becoming amazingly competitive and it looks like they're aiming for full home integration. A smart home.
I think Xiaomi is likely to be the only to push them. Xiaomi is becoming amazingly competitive and it looks like they're aiming for full home integration. A smart home.
You mean just like how Apple has totally and utterly followed and ripped off the Android market by producing a phablet then? Oh yeah, you'll all conveniently forget that one right?
Good points. But the Holiday quarter isn't that relevant for Samsung. It isn't a Holiday quarter for most of the world and most of their customers. And it isn't tied to the launch of their flagship phone the Galaxy S. What I'm curious about is the ability of the other manufacturers to continue to make high end Androids. I'm pretty sure that Samsung can still do it and put serious resources into it. Maybe HTC can on the strength of the One last year. But can the other manufacturers do it? If not, then maybe the GS6 sweeps up a larger percentage of the dwindling high end Android market.
----------
The battery life on Androids was terrible (and in fact continue to be terrible, in that if you tried to run one on the battery in an iPhone it would fail in half a day) so they have to contain much much larger batteries than the iPhone. To have a large battery and remain thin they had to make them wider. Add in that they could not do the tight manufacturing that Apple can do, that also lead to them being wider. Remember there was and continues to be no high end androids made in the smaller form factor. It wasn't because they all figured out something that Apple didn't or refused to see. It is because once they put in the CPU to get the performance they needed to be high end and the battery they needed to run that CPU they were left with having to have a larger form factor.
Even last year, when they tried to make phones in about the same size as the iPhone 5s they had to gimp the CPU and the screen resolution. And Android's battery usage is a lot better than it was two or three years ago.
Remember, whilst Apple is making hay in China presently, Chinese manufacturers will soonn be making hay in Apples' (and Samsungs) traditional markets very soon. Whiost Apple has done well with 40% growth, some of these manufacturers have quadrupled their volumes this year. Samsung are seeing the impact of these manufacturers and no one, even Apple are going to be immune.
But Xiaomi can only sell phones in countries that won't enforce IP rights. They cut costs by not paying for licensing and they copy all their design cues. They can't sell in bulk in the U.S. or Europe. Though it seems they will continue to eat into Samsung's position in China.
Why not? Who knows what Samsung has to offer going forward, It is not beyond the realms that Apple may go down, e.g. more and more competitors in China and the US in 2015 / Initial surge of "big phone" demand subsides a little. We are likely 9 months from anything new from Apple whereas plenty of new HTC / Sony / Samsung /LG and others launching over the next months to eat into demand.
We just dont know, it all changes so dramatically. Two years ago, Samsung had stellar growth that no one could see ending, now they are dropping quickly. The thing is Samsung get 3 or 4 goes each year to try and change the trend, Apple typically gets one. Samsung has to get it right once, Apple has to get it right every single time?
It looks like Samsung is pretty successful, and they are still selling more smartphones than Apple.
But unless you own Apple shares, please tell us how it improves YOUR life when Apple has a record quarter?
Whenever I read that Apple is stock-piling hundreds of billions of (largely un-taxed) dollars on some bank accounts, all I can think of is how much good could be done with that money if corporations were forced to make ethical decisions. 100 billion bucks could most likely bring forth a cure for cancer. It could build schools and provide education. There's no limit to what could be done with that money. All it does right now is sit on a bank account. And as I've said before, that's not even capitalistic - it's just capital that's not being used for anything useful, not even for their own product research or QA (and especially Apple's software QA could really need a boost).
And no, I'm not American. Neither am I a socialist. But this is just immoral.
My guess is they've moved on to slightly less fanboyish sites to get their mobile news.
Anyone that has owned a Samsung phone could see it coming. Their product quality is horrible. This is not Android bashing, it's Samsung bashing. They have a horrible product. I would seriously consider Android again, if it were a Nexus device. There's a reason it's the highest traded in device for the iPhone.
Before people go off on one, please remember the actual results of shipped phones worldwide by Samsung is much higher than Apple:
http://www.cnet.com/news/samsung-global-smartphone-share-falls-as-apples-remains-static/
In fact Apple has remained stagnant, Samsung has dropped, and all the other manufacturers have increased their numbers... Apple has a very long way to go to be worldwide number one.
And a continued drop in iPad sales is nothing to celebrate either. Apples big sales boost has come from China, the market it just entered. So if the chart in my link is anything to go by, it is other manufactures who have taken Samsungs share and not Apple.
Besides, Apple needs Samsung's ideas to stay in the lead.