Which is hardly the first phone using the "slab" form factor. Meet the SE P800 :
![]()
I has been debunked and I don't want to acknowledge it so I will try to make an amusing comment and dig mi head in the sand
If our requirement of a slab phone is a brick with a screen on it, then there's probably an older example.
Oh, so sorry; I assumed it was obvious and common knowledge to those without an agenda/agendum. I really don't have time to write a multiple page post atm, I have coding and work to get to. Just looking through your other posts on completely separate topics however, it's obvious to me that you have a fandroid agenda and are actually even debating against the position that the iPad is a computer. I couldn't help but chuckle at that immense vacuousness.
Computer: an electronic device for storing and processing data, typically in binary form, according to instructions given to it in a variable program.
Hate to break it to you fandroid, but the iPad, iPhone and even iPods fall under that definition, and it isn't up to your subjective interpretation to determine otherwise.
----------
I just ignore vacuous delinquents; I just decided to take note of your previous post, and I really can't be bothered answering comments founded in ignorance. And btw, I'm currently in the middle of doing a BSc majoring in computer science and physics, and I can say with 100% certainty that I know a hell of a lot more than you on any of the topics discussed at length in this forum (the topics that I bother to post on). So, if you want to make cheap ad hominem attacks about someone's earlier life that you know nothing about, simply used to distract and offend, go ahead. From you, it really couldn't mean less.
That's the first smartphone.Glad you brought it up :
![]()
Glad you brought it up :
![]()
Did that phone actually exist, because it looks like a CAD render.
If it was real, it needs to be burnt.
Glad you brought it up :
![]()
You should learn the difference between a PHONE and an OS. Then get back to us![]()
O'rly?You should learn to be less condescending when hiding behind a keyboard and mouse.
Practice what you preach, keyboard warrior!You'd have to be blind not to see that.
You should learn to be less condescending when hiding behind a keyboard and mouse.
I know exactly what the difference is, and the OS is a rip-off of iOS. You'd have to be blind not to see that.
You should learn to communicate better instead of spending time on forums.
You referred to a phone and compared it with an OS. So while you may KNOW what the difference is - you didn't COMMUNICATE it well at all.
You'd have to be blind not to see that.
Glad you brought it up :
![]()
Very true. That explains the longevity and excellence of the ThinkPad T series.Gotta give props to IBM. We wouldn't have many inventions today without them. They hold the most patents of any tech company. Respect the tech pioneers that dominated a generation.
Hey, that looks just like my Droid X2.... well maybe not
----------
Very true. That explains the longevity and excellence of the ThinkPad T series.
Every bit as good as a MacBook Pro, they are excellent Windows laptops. It took a short while after the transition to Lenovo, but they are now back strong as ever. The iconic style that many call "business black" is very tough, very classic and very easy to care for.
They had IPS displays long before and after anyone else did, and the ultrabay on the side assured that one could easily insert a second hard drive, an optical drive, or battery in a matter of seconds. A very versatile laptop.
I know exactly what the difference is, and the OS is a rip-off of iOS. You'd have to be blind not to see that.
You honestly didn't realize I was referring to the blatant ripoffs in the software, when the topic is the OS?
Much apologies. Next time I'll refer to it as "the OS residing on the piece of hardware, so as not to confuse other forum members".
ANDROID with its various derivative skins, is a rip-off of iOS, particularly the Samsung stuff with the Touchwiz overlay. Some may be very good phones, but having a few Android devices at work as well as an iPhone, they're very, very similar. Contrast that with the deceased WebOS or Windows Phone 7, which manage to offer the same ease of use while at least trying to be different.
And at less than half your posts, I don't think I'm spending too much time on Internet forums.![]()
As for GNOME, it resembles OS X more than Windows. In fact, the current iterations of the GNOME desktop environment is clearly inspired by OS X.But that's Samsung's problem, their third-party theme/UI - and Apple did take the matter to EU court with ONLY Samsung and no one else. Android just provides a very flexible approach when it's come to User Interface. Just like the freak'n Linux does with KDE, GNOME, fluxbox...the GNU/Linux kernel has absolutely nothing to do with Microsoft Windows even if some of the more popular GUI - KDE and GNOME look quite like Windows UI. The default UI of Android - the stuff Google provides and recommends (but not mandated) - looks nothing like iOS, at all. Except the pulldown notify bar which first appreared in iOS v5.
With several from the army of third-party Launchers in Android Market, any Android phone can look very much like a Windows Phone 7 - a platform not successful nor released earlier - so following your logic then Android also rips off WP7, Google steals the UI of Microsoft's late and failed project, right?
ANDROID with its various derivative skins, is a rip-off of iOS