People buy Apple products on Amazon? B&H has better deals, correct?
Its not just new Apple products, its everything old including old ipods like the nano, mini, or classic and all Apple accessories such as old discontinued keyboards etc.....
People buy Apple products on Amazon? B&H has better deals, correct?
My old company got on that list, if we went to Apple.com and placed an order, we would be rejected.
Who sells car as refurbished? It would be used car still.
Yes. Especially if you perhaps forget to report your purchases come tax time....People buy Apple products on Amazon? B&H has better deals, correct?
People refurbish cars all the time. To be fair I only recall seeing it used for classic cars.
No, actually we were (probably still are, I haven't worked there in a while) a milti-million dollar company who occasionally used Apple's hardware in areas that were customer visible, due to it looking nicer than competitors - Dell, HP, etc. Our contracts were with universities and government orgs. I think we had a military contract or two at one point... Hardly in violation of export law.
Regarding using "crap" products. That may be, but simply taking a working fan from a broken mac, and putting it into a different mac, would be in violation of the agreement. I agree that there's no reason to call a franken-mac a certified mac, or even pretend that it is, but there's no reason to outright ban them either. For products not sold through Amazon, it becomes an Buyer/Seller issue, where Amazon will simply make the buyer take the item back if it doesn't work.
Well, I'm assuming Wal Mart vets every vendor that they resell. Apple has a review process for their apps.
I'm not sure why Amazon shouldn't have to review vendors that resell through them, particularly ones selling items approaching or exceeding $1,000.
If you are going to create a beast of a revenue machine, you should have the tools in place to vet the products you are selling.
THE CORE of the issue is Amazon's review system comingles all sellers of any item. This is where eBay is much different (and better).
**** amazon, I quit using them and don't miss it at all. I buy less stuff now and don't have to deal with **** products.
It was reported sellers have moved over to Walmart, eBay or Etsy.
So where’s the antitrust issue? Amazon is not the only online marketplace and sellers have many choices where to sell their goods.
Only if you didn’t pay sales tax.Yes. Especially if you perhaps forget to report your purchases come tax time....
If you live outside of NY, I believe there is no tax on purchases from Adorama and B&H.Only if you didn’t pay sales tax.
Commingled FBA inventory is being phased out.It is not enough to mark something as Fulfilled by Amazon, but also that it is not commingled.
Amazon is starting, or has started charging sales tax in certain states. NJ is one of these states. BH I agree with.If you live outside of NY, I believe there is no tax on purchases from Adorama and B&H.
I bought a 5K iMac from Adorama (the original one) and got free shipping and no sales tax.
Of course, you’re supposed to report that at the end of the year.
Amazon is starting, or has started charging sales tax in certain states. NJ is one of these states. BH I agree with.
I get why resellers are complaining, but I also think think brand protection is the primary motivator for Apple in this case. It's common for people to have eBay-like bad experiences when purchasing from Amazon third-party sellers, and I don't think consumers always realize that the "good price" they are getting on an Apple device from Amazon is coming from a third party like they might more obviously realize from eBay.
A good non-Apple example of this is shopping for Ubiquiti UniFi devices on Amazon. The contrast is drastically apparent between what you'll find on Amazon through third parties and what you'll find from an authorized seller like BHPhoto. Amazon becomes a "shop at your own risk" experience, which consumers might not realize, again, like they might if they go looking on eBay. I wouldn't be surprised if a company like Ubiquiti isn't always thinking it would be nice to set up an arrangement with Amazon like Apple has done.
Last time I checked that's referred as restoring not refurbishing.
Since then, independent sellers have been required to apply for Apple Authorized Reseller status and the Amazon Renewed program to continue to offer used or refurbished Apple products on Amazon, but this is not always feasible due to hefty requirements outlined by The Verge earlier this year:
Who made Apple judge, jury and executioner?So you were not an authorized reseller then, and were not in compliance with Apple's programs. Why does Amazon owe you a spot in their store?
Can't speak for the rest of the world , but here in the UK most Apple products are cheaper on Amazon than the official Apple store.People buy Apple products on Amazon? B&H has better deals, correct?
I believe the rule was (and may still be) you can charge sales tax at the time of purchase if you have a physical presence in that state. If that’s still the rule, it makes sense Amazon’s ability to charge sales tax would increase as they put warehouses and facilities in each state. There was a US Supreme Court decision two terms ago that might have modified or changed that rule.Amazon is starting, or has started charging sales tax in certain states. NJ is one of these states. BH I agree with.
By protecting the consumer from shady operators?What do you expect, typical Apple abusing its market power.
Even if you don’t see or agree, it benefits all involved to have sales from authorized sellers, IMO.Who made Apple judge, jury and executioner?
That is not how fair trade is made.
By protecting the consumer from shady operators?
Even if you don’t see or agree, it benefits all involved to have sales from authorized sellers, IMO.
The authorized sellers have to be clearly indicated. If somebody wants to buy from someone else, it is their problem. They are not all shady.By protecting the consumer from shady operators?
Even if you don’t see or agree, it benefits all involved to have sales from authorized sellers, IMO.
Why would Apple get the blame? They did not buy a new or certified machine.Think about this from a business standpoint—-who gets the blame for problems with machines or repairs from sketchy third parties? Apple gets the blame.
Apple has one of the most powerful brands in the world—-they need to protect it.
That is correct. But people tend to blame Apple; not the reseller. Or they associate a bad experience with Apple.The authorized sellers have to be clearly indicated. If somebody wants to buy from someone else, it is their problem. They are not all shady.
[doublepost=1564843175][/doublepost]
Why would Apple get the blame? They did not buy a new or certified machine.