Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My point is I’m tired of people using claims that aren’t true to bolster an opinion they have.

Just state the damn opinion and don’t be lazy with *technical* details on a technology forum.

You can not like the effect of spatial video, but to make the claim that’s is the same as simple stereoscopic video (ignoring the audio component for a moment) is just lazy. So let’s skip to the chase and people should just say they don’t like the effect. That’s fine, opinions are fine, just don’t back it up with technically incorrect information.
You nailed it. The tendency to say *anything* — weak, inaccurate or even false — to score a point or support an opinion is very prominent in this thread.
 
I think there’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what AVP is.

So many reviewers are making comparisons to other headsets like Oculus or PSVR. And in my ways, I don’t think that’s a relevant comparison. Sure some of the technology has parallels, but the purpose of AVP is very different.

Here’s a tangible examples of what I was doing last night. My cat was in a mood to play with me and some toys last night. I had a YouTube video playing via Juno (first party app not available yet) and placed it right next to our play area so I can see her and the video at the same time. In other adjacent areas, I had messages open to check some things and a browser in another area for an article I was reading. No monitor, no device to hold, and hands free.

Yes it’s a great media consumption device with amazing immersion. It can do a lot of things. The true power though IMO is it’s actually a computer with the ability to multitask without the constraint of one screen like an iPad. There’s a lot of improvements to be made for sure. But I think it’s an amazing gen 1, and I’m sure they will make lots of software improvements even in the next 3-6 months.

What are your thoughts?
Despite the haters I think you're right. I think this is the vision (pun intended) Apple has and although the first gen still feels clunky, the idea of merging our digital and physical lives via light weight glasses or contacts feels inevitable and magical and this is Apple's goal. It will actually do wonders for ergonomics to be a knowledge worker and not be tied to a desk anymore.
 
My point is I’m tired of people using claims that aren’t true to bolster an opinion they have.

Just state the damn opinion and don’t be lazy with *technical* details on a technology forum.

You can not like the effect of spatial video, but to make the claim that’s is the same as simple stereoscopic video (ignoring the audio component for a moment) is just lazy. So let’s skip to the chase and people should just say they don’t like the effect. That’s fine, opinions are fine, just don’t back it up with technically incorrect information.

The point is that there is no such thing as “spatial video”. It’s just a marketing term that Apple created out of thin air and allowed the fanatics to run with. It *IS* essentially just simple stereoscopic 3D photography. How can you deny that? Maybe Apple is using LiDAR to some subtle degree for additional depth perception, but until we get a detailed technical breakdown it’s speculation. The fact remains that the demos shown in marketing materials 100% are not genuine video captured with either the iPhone 15 Pro or the AVP and Apple is knowingly engaging in falsehoods. Not a good look!
 
There is a major difference between a physical screen in a stationary position and a virtual screen

i think people underestimate the long term impact on a person’s eyes. There is a difference between a physical screen you can briefly look away from to rest your eyes (even subconsciously) and a virtual screen that looking away from just presents more screen. Not to mention the horrible ergonomic damage of twisting and contorting your neck all day long. It will be great for the massage industry!
That's a good point I hadn't thought of. It's generally recommended that you look away and focus on something distant to prevent eye fatigue if you spend all day in front of a screen: It lets your eye muscles assume a different position which is as good as a rest. I'm not sure that's possible with AVP unless you remove it entirely.

In any case, I was thinking AVP would be good for me a couple of hours a day to let me escape my desk but still get real work done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Surf Monkey
AVP only allows for 1 monitor of your Mac
Interesting. Didn't know that.

You know, it still might be workable if secondary apps like Chrome/Safari, Slack, Zoom (and maybe Teams?), etc. can all run natively in the AVP environment alongside a virtual Mac screen.

I'd be pleasantly surprised , shocked really, if it all works right now - but maybe in a year or two once the app vendors figure out their AVP strategy.
 
I think there’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what AVP is.

So many reviewers are making comparisons to other headsets like Oculus or PSVR. And in my ways, I don’t think that’s a relevant comparison. Sure some of the technology has parallels, but the purpose of AVP is very different.

Here’s a tangible examples of what I was doing last night. My cat was in a mood to play with me and some toys last night. I had a YouTube video playing via Juno (first party app not available yet) and placed it right next to our play area so I can see her and the video at the same time. In other adjacent areas, I had messages open to check some things and a browser in another area for an article I was reading. No monitor, no device to hold, and hands free.

Yes it’s a great media consumption device with amazing immersion. It can do a lot of things. The true power though IMO is it’s actually a computer with the ability to multitask without the constraint of one screen like an iPad. There’s a lot of improvements to be made for sure. But I think it’s an amazing gen 1, and I’m sure they will make lots of software improvements even in the next 3-6 months.

What are your thoughts?
been saying this since the reveal…and it’s only going to get better👍 this blows Meta and Playstation out of the water…it’s the ecosystem that is the killer app, I keep saying that this device is meant to replace iphone, apple watch, ipad, macbook, homePods, apple TV…all of it which is CRAZY!
 
That’s what they have developers for, but for them to be able to get excited about creating these types of apps then you need to give them the best possible hardware and the prospect of multiple product iterations over a number of years. Give it time, the real exciting possibilities will come from the developers, not Apple.

Things an Apple chat bot would say for 100, please.
 
Wasn’t the first iPhone a half-baked tech demo that was allowed to escape from the lab…? You’re right, we should have killed that one off straight away, there’s no way that was ever gonna work, scrap it and move on. Try and look beyond first release products, they’re very rarely resounding successes.
The answer to your question is “no.”
 
Hmmm .. I can’t recall, can you remind us which world class global logistics platform serving 2B+ devices you established .. and which company it was that you grew to a 2 trillion dollar valuation again? 🤔

Odd concept, I know, but has it ever crossed your mind that egregious profits and outsized market domination aren’t necessarily the most admirable goals out there?
 
Agree to disagree there
I think we're 5-10 years away
What you think doesn’t really matter because this idea is beyond the physically possible.

We will never have contact lenses that do any of this, for one. The human eyeball produces zero electricity.

In 10 years you might have slightly longer battery life for a slightly (10%?) slimmer device. If Apple still makes it.
 
Not to mention the horrible ergonomic damage of twisting and contorting your neck all day long. It will be great for the massage industry!
I was actually thinking the VP may let me read in a more ergonomic position than my iPad or iPhone, which I have to twist my neck down to look at. A computer monitor on a desk, if positioned at the right height, lets me keep my head upright while reading, but sitting at a desk isn't relaxing. With the VP, I could read with my head up while relaxing on a sofa or in bed. Of course, the unknown is how much stress having the weight of the VP on my face puts on my neck or other parts of my body. But if the VP is comfortable enough on my face, it could actually put my massage therapist out of business. ;)
 
What you think doesn’t really matter because this idea is beyond the physically possible.

We will never have contact lenses that do any of this, for one. The human eyeball produces zero electricity.

In 10 years you might have slightly longer battery life for a slightly (10%?) slimmer device. If Apple still makes it.
but what you think matters more? Who made you the expert?

contact lenses, I don't know enough about bio or nano engineering, maybe neuralink device makes more sense. Glasses though, definitely happening.
 
No the Apple Watch and iPad use cases were pretty well defined from the get go, health was definitely a part of it in the beginning but they concentrated more on the fashion aspect of it at first. With iPad it was about superior content consumption (books, sites, video, etc)

The AVP is a product in search of a problem that doesn't actually exist for anyone.
You made good points but you went awry at the end. You should have said “…in search of a problem that doesn’t actually exist for *me*.”

Your sweeping statement is exactly what people said about the iPad, and you’re as wrong now as they were then.
 
You made good points but you went awry at the end. You should have said “…in search of a problem that doesn’t actually exist for *me*.”

Your sweeping statement is exactly what people said about the iPad, and you’re as wrong now as they were then.

There were plenty of use cases for the iPad, even at launch. It’s just that there wasn’t a whole lot that it did significantly better than the iPhone. Of course it’s gotten more capable as developers stepped up. But the joke was in the name (which still is kind of funny) and that the Apple faithful at the time — many on this forum — were claiming that it was only a matter of time until the notebook and desktop PC markets would be obsolete. Because the iPad would replace them as productivity powerhouses. Yes, many people actually believed that. Of course they always seem to forget that part 😂
 
Odd concept, I know, but has it ever crossed your mind that egregious profits and outsized market domination aren’t necessarily the most admirable goals out there?
Odd concept, I know, but has it ever crossed your mind that enviable profits and market share are not Apple’s goals — but are actually the market rewarding Tim Cook’s Apple for doing important and difficult things not only well, but significantly better than others?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Surf Monkey
I think there’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what AVP is.

So many reviewers are making comparisons to other headsets like Oculus or PSVR. And in my ways, I don’t think that’s a relevant comparison. Sure some of the technology has parallels, but the purpose of AVP is very different.

Here’s a tangible examples of what I was doing last night. My cat was in a mood to play with me and some toys last night. I had a YouTube video playing via Juno (first party app not available yet) and placed it right next to our play area so I can see her and the video at the same time. In other adjacent areas, I had messages open to check some things and a browser in another area for an article I was reading. No monitor, no device to hold, and hands free.

Yes it’s a great media consumption device with amazing immersion. It can do a lot of things. The true power though IMO is it’s actually a computer with the ability to multitask without the constraint of one screen like an iPad. There’s a lot of improvements to be made for sure. But I think it’s an amazing gen 1, and I’m sure they will make lots of software improvements even in the next 3-6 months.

What are your thoughts?
Due to newness of the AVP product and its form resembles somewhat with existing a typical VR device, people make comparison to the typical VR devices. They are pretty much a computer headset with extended features for AVP.
Hence, no fundamental misunderstanding occurred, but different perspective.
For me, AVP is great for media consumption for “not” extended long period of time. I am wondering if 8-10 hours wearing the headset will be comfortable for people in general. I know I will not be comfortable of wearing anything around my eyes and head all the time or long periods of time. But for some, that is doable. Hence, the computing headset is great for some group of people but not for everyone.
Keep calm, decide if AVP is great for your life style and be happy with your decision 😊 Life is too short for being unhappy😊
 
Despite the haters I think you're right. I think this is the vision (pun intended) Apple has and although the first gen still feels clunky, the idea of merging our digital and physical lives via light weight glasses or contacts feels inevitable and magical and this is Apple's goal. It will actually do wonders for ergonomics to be a knowledge worker and not be tied to a desk anymore.
Magical. Do you hear yourself?

Magical, just like AI taking away those important “knowledge worker” jobs…
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.