Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It may be a dumb question, but what would be the difference of performance between the Mac book air and the MacBook Pro since they have the same ship?
The Pro will be able to sustain high performance longer since it has a fan. That would make a difference for video encoding for long projects, for example. I'm sure we'll start seeing comparisons next week.

Also, it's possible that Apple is "binning" chips, and allocating the higher performing chips to the MacBook Pros, and lower performing chips to the MacBook Air.
 
A smaller Mac Pro could be good I guess? But overall size isn't a huge priority for professionals I would think. Though if they kept the expansion and the size reduction was purely b/c of less cooling needed, that could be cool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coolkiwi
Hard to see use for a 14" being that 2 new 13" were just released... 2x M1's for the 16" MBP?

Either the 14" MacBook Pro will replace the 13" MacBook Pro or it will be a higher-end model overall (better M-series SoC, MiniLED, more ports and unified RAM capacity, more storage capacity). That way the 13" MBP would stay as the lower-price model like when Apple offered a 13" 2-port MBP without a Touch Bar and a 13" 4-port MBP with a Touch Bar.


The Mac Pro will be smaller because it will lose all of its expansion capabilities and won’t have a need for as much cooling and can use a smaller power supply.

Kind of defeats the purpose of a Mac Pro though...


What the purpose of a 14" model other than cramming a 16" into a 14" form factor?
Why not returning the 12" too cramming 13,x into 12"?

See above - either a replacement for the 13" or a higher-end and higher-priced model in the lineup.


If they dont offer 32 and 64 MB memory options, its a non-starter for me.

We will certainly see more powerful M series SoCs with more cores, more USB/TB controllers, and more unified memory next year for the iMac and MacBook Pro 14/16 and hopefully the Mac Mini.

It may be a dumb question, but what would be the difference of performance between the Mac book air and the MacBook Pro since they have the same ship?

In general it will be the same, but the MacBook Pro will be able to sustain higher workloads longer since it has active cooling (though one wonders how often an iPad Pro thermally throttles itself).
 
C'mon Apple, give us a 32" iMac!
Well, I do at least want a 27" iMac to replace my 27" 2014 retina 5k.

And while we're at it, when they introduce the 16" MBP, I'm assuming we'll be able to get more than 16 GB of RAM, haha :) I love my 2020 16", but the Intel does overheat far too frequently for someone that's working on it constantly.
 
To be fair, Intel is carrying baggage from the 1980's with the 8086/8088 instruction set. Lot easier to make big leaps when you start from an architectures that's 30 years newer.
The core is not the same as 30 years ago.
Also if you are judging by instruction set; the ARM instruction set dates back to the 1990s. Remember the Apple Newton? It used an ARM processor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
I'm am so ready for a new iMac and a 24" version would be ordered immediately when announced.
Yep, same here. And if I can do a little inference about what the base model will offer specs- and price-wise based upon yesterday’s event, then I will be a very happy customer. It will be a great addition to our household.

patiently waiting...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coolkiwi
No. Memory is built into/onto the chip.

This isn't Tesla where they can enable or disable feature(s) via software, and then when you sell your Model S Mac, Tesla Apple can disable features you paid for.
Which indicates that LPDDR4/5 with multiple channels along with PCIe Gen3/4 on en external interface is still in development and we don't know the state.
Along with the LPDDR phy's you also need schedulers/controllers. Same with PCIe phy's.
I keep telling people this stuff is not a slam dunk.
I work designing chips for a living.
 
You already have linux...check WWDC, and windows will come next year gladly license to you for 100-200$
You miss the point, it's not enough to have Linux.
I run Linux in a VM and I need X86.
My company will not buy a Mac that does not run X86 Linux.
They will buy something other than Mac's.
Right now it's the preferred machine because it can run Office, has BSD underneath and can run xn X86 VM with native instructions.
 
I believe, I'm pretty positive Apple said at WWDC they would continue to support & release new Intel Macs alongside the Apple Silicon ones during the 2 year transition. I think 2025 is the earliest macOS that drops Intel support.

Looking at Apple removing CD drives and audio jacks and power cord types (old MacBook MagSafe in particular) I wouldn’t count on how long Apple will support anything. Especially something using a direct competitors processor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coolkiwi
I had to pull the trigger on a new Apple laptop three months ago, so I went with a 13" MBP in the high-end stock configuration. Now that Amazon sells them as an authorized dealer, stock configurations can be a great deal if you hit the right sale, and I'm glad that Apple has moved towards stock configurations that are well-configured for all but real power users. I was really tempted to wait, but if a 14" micro-LED isn't coming out until mid-2021, and a 2nd gen 14" micro-LED isn't coming out until 2022, I'm fine waiting to 2022 or later before switching over to AS. Hopefully, by then, the machines will come stock with at least 16GB ram and 1TB HDs, as well as 4 TB ports. I'd mention 1080p cameras, too, but there will be riots if that's not in the next laptops Apple introduces!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coolkiwi
The Mac Pro will be smaller because it will lose all of its expansion capabilities and won’t have a need for as much cooling and can use a smaller power supply.
No way. Apple (hopefully) learned their lesson with the Mac Pro 2013. There's no way whatever they design will not allow internal and external expansion, though I do agree, the casing will be somewhat smaller.
 
You miss the point, it's not enough to have Linux.
I run Linux in a VM and I need X86.
My company will not buy a Mac that does not run X86 Linux.
They will buy something other than Mac's.
Right now it's the preferred machine because it can run Office, has BSD underneath and can run xn X86 VM with native instructions.
You didnt said that but after i read your comment again i understood. If you need x86 legacy windows or linux then you are not for a mac. Maybe in 2-3 years after all your windows x86 apps will run native under windows/linux arm
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
small chip giant leap. Yeah right.

Lets see the lab results

in a world where people want compatibility how are these new Macs going to work in the corporate world on an Active Directory Microsoft Network?

They're NOT. cause they just lost the ability to run or boot windows

The 7 percent Mac share apple had to the 92 percent share of windows will dwindle.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.