You already have linux...check WWDC, and windows will come next year gladly license to you for 100-200$People who want/need to run multiple OSes (Windows, Linux)? People with x86 software?
You already have linux...check WWDC, and windows will come next year gladly license to you for 100-200$People who want/need to run multiple OSes (Windows, Linux)? People with x86 software?
You're welcome to my 2020 16" when the ASi version comes out.so please a last 16" with Intel!
The Pro will be able to sustain high performance longer since it has a fan. That would make a difference for video encoding for long projects, for example. I'm sure we'll start seeing comparisons next week.It may be a dumb question, but what would be the difference of performance between the Mac book air and the MacBook Pro since they have the same ship?
PossibleHow about 2 M1's?
Compared to a quad core i7 machine. It’s in Apple’s website.Compared to what? I3 machine?
If you want to know what Apple is basing the performance metrics of the ASi Macs on, all you have to do go to the product pages of each device, scroll all the way down to the fine print and it will tell you what the performance of each machine is being compared to.Compared to what? I3 machine?
Hard to see use for a 14" being that 2 new 13" were just released... 2x M1's for the 16" MBP?
The Mac Pro will be smaller because it will lose all of its expansion capabilities and won’t have a need for as much cooling and can use a smaller power supply.
What the purpose of a 14" model other than cramming a 16" into a 14" form factor?
Why not returning the 12" too cramming 13,x into 12"?
If they dont offer 32 and 64 MB memory options, its a non-starter for me.
It may be a dumb question, but what would be the difference of performance between the Mac book air and the MacBook Pro since they have the same ship?
Yup!If you want to know what Apple is basing the performance metrics of the ASi Macs on, all you have to do go to the product pages of each device, scroll all the way down to the fine print and it will tell you what the performance of each machine is being compared to.
My guess => M2 will be for the 16" MBP and the remaining Intel-based 13" MBP and Mac mini. M3 for iMacSo M2 will be available for 16", 14", iMac and Mac Pro
thats not how Apple's naming works, an M2 would be for the Air 2, a 16 mbp would have M2X or some ****So M2 will be available for 16", 14", iMac and Mac Pro
Well, I do at least want a 27" iMac to replace my 27" 2014 retina 5k.C'mon Apple, give us a 32" iMac!
The core is not the same as 30 years ago.To be fair, Intel is carrying baggage from the 1980's with the 8086/8088 instruction set. Lot easier to make big leaps when you start from an architectures that's 30 years newer.
Yep, same here. And if I can do a little inference about what the base model will offer specs- and price-wise based upon yesterday’s event, then I will be a very happy customer. It will be a great addition to our household.I'm am so ready for a new iMac and a 24" version would be ordered immediately when announced.
Which indicates that LPDDR4/5 with multiple channels along with PCIe Gen3/4 on en external interface is still in development and we don't know the state.No. Memory is built into/onto the chip.
This isn't Tesla where they can enable or disable feature(s) via software, and then when you sell yourModel SMac,TeslaApple can disable features you paid for.
You miss the point, it's not enough to have Linux.You already have linux...check WWDC, and windows will come next year gladly license to you for 100-200$
Does each M1 has 16GB RAM and is 8GB upgraded to 16GB via an software switch!?
I believe, I'm pretty positive Apple said at WWDC they would continue to support & release new Intel Macs alongside the Apple Silicon ones during the 2 year transition. I think 2025 is the earliest macOS that drops Intel support.
Compared to the Intel versions of the same models Apple is currently ships. It pays to read/watch the product announcement if you'd like to understand the context. Just sayin'.Compared to what? I3 machine?
No way. Apple (hopefully) learned their lesson with the Mac Pro 2013. There's no way whatever they design will not allow internal and external expansion, though I do agree, the casing will be somewhat smaller.The Mac Pro will be smaller because it will lose all of its expansion capabilities and won’t have a need for as much cooling and can use a smaller power supply.
You didnt said that but after i read your comment again i understood. If you need x86 legacy windows or linux then you are not for a mac. Maybe in 2-3 years after all your windows x86 apps will run native under windows/linux armYou miss the point, it's not enough to have Linux.
I run Linux in a VM and I need X86.
My company will not buy a Mac that does not run X86 Linux.
They will buy something other than Mac's.
Right now it's the preferred machine because it can run Office, has BSD underneath and can run xn X86 VM with native instructions.