Originally posted by singletrack
There's some doubt being cast here that IBM would be developing a 750 with Altivec. I'd counter that by restating 'Go look at the Motorola PPC PDF posted earlier'.
IBM sells the 750 into the embedded market as well. If they've not got an answer to Moto's 7447/7457 for the embedded market then they'll lose in that market. You can bet your house they are building a 750VX as an answer to Moto and if it's due in the summer it'll be right up there against the predicted (by Moto - yeah, I know) faster 90nm process G4, both coming in at around the 10W power mark.
I'd be very surprised if IBM can get the 970 down in power to embedded processor power requirements (ie. >10W) and that follows for iBook power requirements as it's a cheap laptop with no fans. The 970 is not an embedded processor and pro laptop requirements are diverging now from the embedded sphere.
But your forgetting that you can always clock down a CPU. Read the 15"/17" PowerBook technotes and you'll see that they both can clock down to 612/765/815 Mhz (from 1/1.25/1.33Ghz) to save battery power, and the savings are excellent because it's a voltage reduction. Remember that IBM had estimated the 970 @ 1.2 Ghz running at 1.1v at 19 watts - half way to embedded and faster than what Motorola had for the embedded market in the same power range (the 1.06Ghz 7455 went as low as 15 watts iirc). So IBM is a process shrink away from the possibility of being more power efficient than the 7455 (although possibly not as efficient as the 7457). And if the rumor about IBM jumping directly to 60 nm instead of to 90 nm first, then they have the market, period (although I doubt this rumor is true).