Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Plus, almost all reviewers said Galaxy Nexus is the best ANDROID phone at the moment.

I'm still trying to decide but it is tough to be honest. Some part of me says iPhone and the other Galaxy Nexus. But overall, I think I'm closer to Galaxy Nexus. But Galaxy Nexus being a bit more expensive makes me think...

Tut tut tut. Fixed.

Also please just go and get the Galaxy Nexus already.
 
Tut tut tut. Fixed.

Also please just go and get the Galaxy Nexus already.

He was stating what the reviews have said, and he was correct in his statement. The reviews have been touting it as possibly being the best phone available at the moment (of course that will likely change very soon when the quads come out).
 
I don't own an iPhone, so I am pretty objective.

Outside: iPhone is better built, you have to enjoy the compactly designed glass to enjoy it.

inside: iOS 5 does not lag, responsive scrolling. And,

iOS is more mature, it is strictly controlled by Apple. Versus Android, which is a lump sum of everyone else like Samsung, Motorola. It is an open source.

It's up to you, but Apple still has very quality stuff, you can't go wrong.
 
I think that changed with ICS and Galaxy Nexus. Everybody says it's super smooth and super slick. Check out this speed test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQEC_Y5v3Zw
I would wait for more definitive tests before making any conclusions.

Plus, almost all reviewers said Galaxy Nexus is the best phone at the moment.

Engadget: http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/galaxy-nexus-hspa-review
Slashgear: http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-review-21196912
The verge: http://www.theverge.com/2011/11/17/2568348/galaxy-nexus-review

I'm still trying to decide but it is tough to be honest. Some part of me says iPhone and the other Galaxy Nexus. But overall, I think I'm closer to Galaxy Nexus. But Galaxy Nexus being a bit more expensive makes me think...

Reading the reviews, I see no mention saying that it is the best phone at the moment, just the best Android phone. Those 3 reviews are also very light. No detailed camera tests or battery tests or even speed tests.
 
Reading the reviews, I see no mention saying that it is the best phone at the moment, just the best Android phone. Those 3 reviews are also very light. No detailed camera tests or battery tests or even speed tests.

Most reviews are done in this exact format. They didn't do anything out of the ordinary from any other review. They discuss the camera, the battery, and speeds in the reviews, they can only go so far in depth on a review. It sounds like what you'd like to see is a review from someone that uses the phone as their daily driver. Bottom line is these reviews are consistent in their review methods (the same methods used on the iphone) so I have no problem with them...it really just sounds like nitpicking and looking for fault.
 
Plus, almost all reviewers said Galaxy Nexus is THE best phone at the moment.

He was stating what the reviews have said, and he was correct in his statement. The reviews have been touting it as POSSIBLY being the best phone available at the moment (of course that will likely change very soon when the quads come out).

No he wasn't. One is probable, the other is definitive. The former suggest there are some reasons it arguably falls short of the latter.

The only definitive statement in those reviews is that the GS is the best Android smartphone. Anything else and you're just reaching.

Thats what annoys me with Android enthusiasts. Exaggerate and/or bend to aid their arguments. Then again thats the way most enthusiasts (Andoid, WP7, Apple etc) operate. Just call a spade a spade.

I agree with the previous poster. OP should just it over and done with and get the GS. In fact i'd rather he doesn't get the 4S because its highly likely he will come back and moan about something...lamenting the fact that he didn't get the GS after all which is what he actually wants.

Commence the downvoting in 3...2...1...
 
Last edited:
Those that experienced ICS, could you give me some insight on how it's better than 2.3 and 3.x please in the following concerns:

- I use iCal and Contacts. Does ICS have better integration, or at least better transitioning to gcal and gcontacts? I still need to use iCal and contacts on my Macs.
- is Skype supporting video chat on the nexus and ICS in general? (since I have to give up FaceTime)
- is the 'find my phone' feature now handled by google, or still just Samsung (which is terrible like a beta version)?
- I love iTunes being one app that does everything (a lot of things), any similar alternatives out there?
- most importantly (a deal breaker), can it now do a complete backup to cloud and to Mac computer?
 
Okay, explain to me how it isn't. And when you respond understand that I am attempting to have a discussion and don't wish for this to become an exchange of barbs. I say it is a more robust OS due to the depth that you can go with it. Without having to mod the OS you can customize it to your liking. You can change the way it operates, you can change the level of functionality it gives you, you can change the look of it as a whole. The level of social integration is also unmatched by iOS, the same can also be said about cloud functionality (for example, videos can reside in the cloud whereas on icloud it cannot reside there). The browser experience with the full screen and quick menu enabled makes for a browsing experience that iOS cannot match (if you haven't seen the quick menu in action you should check it out, it's awesome). Basically the amount of depth to the OS is what makes it more robust. You can make it as plain and simple or as customized and personal as you'd like it to be. Simply put, you have options.

You and I have different definition of 'robust'. I would call what you describe as versatile, flexible, better customization. Robust on the other hand is something that can take some abuse and still works, something that does need less maintainance or tweaking, something that works out of the box. For this reason, I would not call ICS more robust than iOS.
 
No he wasn't. One is probable, the other is definitive. The former suggest there are some reasons it arguably falls short of the latter.

The only definitive statement in those reviews is that the GS is the best Android smartphone. Anything else and you're just reaching.

Thats what annoys me with Android enthusiasts. Exaggerate and/or bend to aid their arguments. Then again thats the way most enthusiasts (Andoid, WP7, Apple etc) operate. Just call a spade a spade.

I agree with the previous poster. OP should just it over and done with and get the GS. In fact i'd rather he doesn't get the 4S because its highly likely he will come back and moan about something...lamenting the fact that he didn't get the GS after all which is what he actually wants.

Commence the downvoting in 3...2...1...

Stop with the word games. "it's possibly even the best phone available today, period." Even the ending suggests what the reviewer was thinking. Plus, I wonder if there is such a quote in iPhone 4S' review.

And, I am honestly, with all my heart trying to decide. None of what I said is wrong. Plus, these are sentences which have never been said for an Android phone. This alone is a genuine excuse for my confusion.
 

Attachments

  • Galaxy-Nexus-vs-iPhone-4S-Camera-comparison-Samples-Nexus-01.jpg
    Galaxy-Nexus-vs-iPhone-4S-Camera-comparison-Samples-Nexus-01.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 168
  • Galaxy-Nexus-vs-iPhone-4S-Camera-comparison-Samples-4S-01.jpg
    Galaxy-Nexus-vs-iPhone-4S-Camera-comparison-Samples-4S-01.jpg
    437 KB · Views: 144
I really dislike how the "buttons" are embedded into the software itself on the Nexus. That's just really stupid and takes up screen space. Also, I dislike Samsung products, they have plastic construction and look really "China".
 
I'll weigh in on this. I've pretty much tested all the high end Android phones out there. I've owned three different versions of the iPhone. For me here is what is important when choosing a phone. Honestly I think its should be the most important aspects of *any* phone.

-Battery Life
-Software Updates (Including .0 upgrades)
-UI responsiveness
-App Selection
-Pocketibility
-Build Quality and Design
-Great Camera
-Media Store Integration (Music, Books, Magazines, Movies)

Now ask yourself if any Android phone can match the iPhone in any of these categories?

The only reason anyone should look at Android is if they live in GMAIL, don't own an iPad for their bigger screen desires, or they live where wifi is no where to be found and they need LTE.
 
Keep in mind that the Galaxy Nexus will be obsolete within the next few months. Much like it is obsoleting the GS2.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I disagree that the Nexus has a better screen. It's size is huge for me and I would never be able to use it with one hand. The iPhones display is sharper and of better quality.
I also find iOS better than Android.
 
Keep in mind that the Galaxy Nexus will be obsolete within the next few months. Much like it is obsoleting the GS2.

May be not 'obsolete', but no longer the 'latest and greatest'. For example, SGS 2 is still very capable and likely upgradable to ICS (eventually). More importantly, the SGS 2 prices dropped as the SGS 2 LTE becomes available. You are right, it won't be long before a newer Android phone is introduced. Perhaps that's the time to be the Galaxy Nexus to get the biggest bang of your bucks.
 
I'll weigh in on this. I've pretty much tested all the high end Android phones out there. I've owned three different versions of the iPhone. For me here is what is important when choosing a phone. Honestly I think its should be the most important aspects of *any* phone.

-Battery Life
-Software Updates (Including .0 upgrades)
-UI responsiveness
-App Selection
-Pocketibility
-Build Quality and Design
-Great Camera
-Media Store Integration (Music, Books, Magazines, Movies)

Now ask yourself if any Android phone can match the iPhone in any of these categories?

The only reason anyone should look at Android is if they live in GMAIL, don't own an iPad for their bigger screen desires, or they live where wifi is no where to be found and they need LTE.


Excellent post, I would add to the list: 1. Warranty 2. Extended warranty like Apple Care Plus.

I hope you don't mind me plagiarizing you when arguing this point to my Blackberry and Android buddies?
 
Most reviews are done in this exact format. They didn't do anything out of the ordinary from any other review. They discuss the camera, the battery, and speeds in the reviews, they can only go so far in depth on a review. It sounds like what you'd like to see is a review from someone that uses the phone as their daily driver. Bottom line is these reviews are consistent in their review methods (the same methods used on the iphone) so I have no problem with them...it really just sounds like nitpicking and looking for fault.

I'll wait for the gsmarena or anandtech reviews before making any conclusions. At lest they do some detailed analysis instead of fluff reviews.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I disagree that the Nexus has a better screen. It's size is huge for me and I would never be able to use it with one hand. The iPhones display is sharper and of better quality.
I also find iOS better than Android.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I did the math and the Nexus screen is retina as well, and how can you get sharper than retina? It has a PPI of 315 which is over the retina threshold. I admittedly don't know enough about PenTile screens, but as long as you can't see pixels, wouldn't it still be considered retina?

I also think that it's completely fair to be having the Nexus vs. 4S discussion here. The Nexus is the first phone that has made me even consider moving away from the iPhone, and I've had every generation since the 3G. I think the Nexus and 4S and iOS and ICS are close enough that it all comes down to a matter of taste and opinion now.
 
I would wait for more definitive tests before making any conclusions.



Reading the reviews, I see no mention saying that it is the best phone at the moment, just the best Android phone. Those 3 reviews are also very light. No detailed camera tests or battery tests or even speed tests.


Well here's a few quotes from those reviews...

Verge: The Galaxy Nexus is the best Android phone ever made. It's one of the best smartphones ever made, and with a couple of minor tweaks (particularly to the camera), it could be the best smartphone ever produced.

Engadget: Let's not beat around the bush. The Galaxy Nexus is definitely the best Android phone available today -- it's possibly even the best phone available today, period

Very strong words coming from websites that can easily be considered Apple biased. I honestly don't ever recall reading an iPhone review using such words. I think the problem with a lot of the sheep is they bring up old arguments that no longer apply. Especially against an OS that is completely new and you haven't even tried. :rolleyes:
 
I think that changed with ICS and Galaxy Nexus. Everybody says it's super smooth and super slick. Check out this speed test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQEC_Y5v3Zw

Plus, almost all reviewers said Galaxy Nexus is the best phone at the moment.

Engadget: http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/galaxy-nexus-hspa-review
Slashgear: http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-review-21196912
The verge: http://www.theverge.com/2011/11/17/2568348/galaxy-nexus-review

I'm still trying to decide but it is tough to be honest. Some part of me says iPhone and the other Galaxy Nexus. But overall, I think I'm closer to Galaxy Nexus. But Galaxy Nexus being a bit more expensive makes me think...

So an underclocked "inferior tech" processor at 800mhz is still keeping up with the 1200mhz from the galaxy with 1gb of ram vs. the "paltry 512mb har har".

Just found it interesting. The iPhone is still keeping up nicely. That speaks volumes.
 
Stop with the word games. "it's possibly even the best phone available today, period." Even the ending suggests what the reviewer was thinking. Plus, I wonder if there is such a quote in iPhone 4S' review.

And, I am honestly, with all my heart trying to decide. None of what I said is wrong. Plus, these are sentences which have never been said for an Android phone. This alone is a genuine excuse for my confusion.

DO you also post on the internet everytime you are buying a new shirt, or a new microwave oven?

Just get it already. Your post already shows you are trying to downgrade the 4S. Why the need to justify your purchase? Are you going to enjoy it less if you do not have the approval of some random forum members?

Never really get this.
 
DO you also post on the internet everytime you are buying a new shirt, or a new microwave oven?

Just get it already. Your post already shows you are trying to downgrade the 4S. Why the need to justify your purchase? Are you going to enjoy it less if you do not have the approval of some random forum members?

Never really get this.

Why are you so insecure? Is Apple your company or what? Just don't post here if you are so much bothered.

Never really get this.
 
So an underclocked "inferior tech" processor at 800mhz is still keeping up with the 1200mhz from the galaxy with 1gb of ram vs. the "paltry 512mb har har".

Just found it interesting. The iPhone is still keeping up nicely. That speaks volumes.
I'll start by saying that clock speeds are not equal across different processors. That being said, the GNex is underclocked too. That particular processor normally is clocked at 1.5ghz as opposed to the 1.2 it is currently clocked at. So even if the 4s were running at it's full clock speed, if the Gnex were too the outcome would still be the same. Bottom line is they are both underclocked (primarily for battery reasons) 20%, so the 4s being underclocked and it performing how it does says no more than the gnex being underclocked and performing how it does. It's really neither here nor there.


Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I disagree that the Nexus has a better screen. It's size is huge for me and I would never be able to use it with one hand. The iPhones display is sharper and of better quality.
I also find iOS better than Android.
You may not be partial to the screen size but that still doesn't change the fact the screen is better. I'm not a fan of a certain line of Mercedes but I do acknowledge it is better than my Audi A4. I think the more correct thing to say is just that you don't like the size, but to discount the screen would be incorrect.

You and I have different definition of 'robust'. I would call what you describe as versatile, flexible, better customization. Robust on the other hand is something that can take some abuse and still works, something that does need less maintainance or tweaking, something that works out of the box. For this reason, I would not call ICS more robust than iOS.
Yes it would seem we do. When I say robust, I mean complete, having depth, more usability, etc.
 
When I say robust, I mean complete, having depth, more usability, etc.

More complete? There are plenty of things in iOS that ICS doesn't have and vice versa. I wouldn't say that any is more complete. I've already pointed out some features like better notifications, safari reader and others like airplay, AirPrint, better music syncing (opinion - I do not like drag and drop, I'd rather have it done automatically) and support for full local backups and of course a much better app selection. I'm sure there's more as well.

Usability is also debatable. I think your meaning of "robust" is better customisation and freedom to install and modify just about anything you want.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.