Man, I'm sorry but that's the worst link you could use. Samsung patented one particular way to produce a pressure-sensitive touchscreen, by using a film of carbon nanotubes. Did that actually work out as a product? Not so far. Is that what Apple's doing with 3D touch? Nope.
Samsung also didn't 'invent' the idea of a pressure-sensitive touchscreen. Nobody did. It's a pretty bloody obvious extension from the idea of a touchscreen; we've had pressure-sensitive input devices for literally decades.
Apple used a technique that works today. Samsung patented some other technique that never went in to production and may or may not work.
Personally, my annoyance isn't that they're doing a pressure-sensitive screen; it's that they didn't have the imagination to include it before Apple did. They add so much useless garbage to their phones, while pointing out how Apple only adds small incremental features every year. Most of those useless features get killed and it's only the things they copy from Apple that anybody cares about.
I'm willing to give new entrants to the market a lot of leeway to copy so long as they also build on it with good, original ideas. Samsung warped Android outrageously in to an iOS clone, and have spent a decade trying and failing to create interesting, original features that can improve a smartphone.
I would like Apple to have a good top-tier competitor, but one with class. Google used to have it, but since Android they've been forced to take reprehensible positions in cases about standards-essential patents and copyright-ability of APIs, not to mention their attempts to control very broad TLDs, the Open Handset Alliance mafia and their neglect of the AOSP. Google have no class any more.
I'd take a strong Microsoft, though: very original designs, both in hardware and software. Nowadays they would be a competitor you could respect.