The lack of the back button makes navigation all around clunkier.
Swipe from the left in iOS to go back. Simple and as easy as a back button.
The lack of the back button makes navigation all around clunkier.
I think you will find that consumers aren't really all that price-sensitive when it comes to iPhones, so I doubt a price cut would affect sales of iPhones all that much.
If anything, the iPhone probably faces more competition from older iPhone models than any other android smartphone model out there. Even if they are flagship phones like the S8.
The real question is whether Trump switched to an iPhone or not, and whether he will upgrade to a Droid for security concerns:
http://gizmodo.com/what-happened-to-donald-trumps-unsecured-tweet-machine-1793438615
It could cost a $1 and that still wouldn't make me buy one because it runs Android...
http://dai.ly/x54pq6k
It could cost a $1 and that still wouldn't make me buy one because it runs Android...
http://dai.ly/x54pq6k
It works only in a few apps. And consistency is key when it comes to UI navigation. The Android back button works not only in every single app, but it can be used to jump back between apps. Plus, even if Apple and their entire developer ecosystem would perform a miracle and make this back swipe universally functional, it would still be more clunky than simply tapping something that's under your thumb.Swipe from the left in iOS to go back. Simple and as easy as a back button.
So no 'Hey Google' on Samsung devices?
Or are there two assistants always actively listening depending on which one you want to use ?
As long as swipe left doesn't actually interact with the app, i.e. in the gallery app swipe left does something completely different than back. So yes, it is clunky , there is no fixed back button consistent across the board.Swipe from the left in iOS to go back. Simple and as easy as a back button.
True. Who needs a computer nowadays.. no.. seriously.. who does. iPhone 8 edition can do everything a computer can do!The premium iphone 8 is gonna cost as much as a macbook
Why not? I have both an iPhone and an Android device... enjoy both experiences for different reasons.Looks really nice but I couldn't have an Android OS phone.
I'm sorry, but this post is a theory based on assumptions which IMO are wrong.Please don't use word theory. What you get is ******** nonsense.
I've been on iOS for a long time and it works in 99% of apps. Not enough to get worked up about. I've used both and neither is better than the other. They are just different.It works only in a few apps. And consistency is key when it comes to UI navigation. The Android back button works not only in every single app, but it can be used to jump back between apps. Plus, even if Apple and their entire developer ecosystem would perform a miracle and make this back swipe universally functional, it would still be more clunky than simply tapping something that's under your thumb.
No comparison really. Like pretty much in every single regard, Android is just much more functional and customisable.
Please don't use the word theory.I'm sorry, but this post is a theory based on assumptions which IMO are wrong.
Expand? You do know there are more definitions for theory than scientific theories right?Please don't use the word theory.
$500-1000 for a telephone!
People pay that for a status symbol or a fashion accessory, not a 'phone.
I refuse to be involved, my IQ has been slipping enough lately.
Right. Not too much sexual selection pressure in my demographic. (60+)90% of what is fueling the smartphone market is sexual selection pressures and the desire to display status.
It's probably #2, only behind clothing in that regard.
I'd like to see demographic data for the high-end segment. I'd guess the vast majority of buyers are in their 20s and early 30s.
A phone shouldn't cost a 1000 dollars, period. The lack of a serious competitor for Apple is costing the industry badly.