whats wrong with 5200??
you do realize that rpm stands for revolutions per minute, and that you pretty much stated the same thing twice..
Yes, I did realize my mistake.
whats wrong with 5200??
you do realize that rpm stands for revolutions per minute, and that you pretty much stated the same thing twice..
Hmm, the price is quite fair. Could you let us know after you tested how the performance is, I would like one for my Macbook Pro but I'm concerned about the 5200 rpm rotational speed.
Yes, I did realize my mistake.I know what rpm is, I'm certainly not a noob to computing by any means which is why I asked about the rotational speed. Most laptops come with the standard 5400 RPM hard drives. Most people upgrade to 7200 RPM for faster disk access and file retrieval. The OP's is a step backwards. I thought it was a mistake until I checked WD's website and it is in fact 5200 but it's slower than most of their line that offers 5400 and 7200 drives.
wasnt implying that you were a noob.. but 7200 rpm does not necessarily mean faster disc access, when i was buying my mbp i did some research and sometimes 5200 is faster than a 7200 (i forgot where i found that).. and yes 5200 is a bit slower but you really have no reason to complain when you have 1tb in your laptop lol..
and "i" did not do this mod... yet...
I would love 1TB hard drive in my MBP, but not at the expense of slower performance.
ROFL, when Apple could do better people get mad at others for saying exactly what you just said. We pay for it, but we shouldn't complain?
At any rate, if you care to look here's just one of many articles I checked that say that anything below 5400 rpm slows down the computer. Should I believe multiple articles or you?![]()
http://www.ontechnews.com/computer-tips/how-to-buy-pc/hard-drive-rotational-speed/ I'm sorry buddy, but where did you get the idea that faster rotational speeds don't necessarily mean faster disk access? This could only be true if there was a big difference in overall specs between hard drives. Most hard drives in the same price point have about the same overall specs, the rotational speed is generally the deciding factor.
I would love 1TB hard drive in my MBP, but not at the expense of slower performance.
Yes, the larger platters on the 1tb drive should make it as fast as a 7200rpm 500gb drive. Cool!!!
So tempting to replace my 320gb HD with this!
my point for you cant complain was that you know it was only 5200 rpm but you were gaining 1tb worth of space..
and when i was reading up on a couple different drives i came across a few 5400's that did better write times than a 72.. im trying to find the article but i cant..
go ahead and believe multiple articles i really dont care but im saying theres at least one article which says that on occasion a 5400 rpm hard drive can out perform a 7200..
Thanks for posting - I'm interested to know if your battery cover touches the HDD? Are there any scuff/scrape marks on it? Is the cover any harder to close?
Thanks for posting - I'm interested to know if your battery cover touches the HDD? Are there any scuff/scrape marks on it? Is the cover any harder to close?
Wondering this myself..
Do you have any heat issues because the hard drive sticks out more and thus preventing more airflow?
I'm so excited to do this when I get a new MBP when the refresh comes out! Do you have a drive installed in the optical bay slot? If you don't use your optical drive so much you can replace it with an SSD and set the computer to boot to it and it would be faster!
I'm also reading that many people are having trouble with the hibernation and various other quirks with switching where the boot drive is. I'm wondering if there's a way you can still mount the 1TB in the optical slot? by just using cables and fastening it down so it doesn't move?
hdd in hdd bay, hdd sticks out same as battery, runs cool, no issues yet.
oooh interesting so all I have to do is insert dvd that came with apple the snow leopard... turn off comp... swap out hdd .. boot from CD to install OS. and the connect old HDD to the comp as time machine back up... what about firevault...user ids etc.. I assume it would be better to disable all the security password features before taking out the drive thus making just a simple plug and play? Also I have the late 2009 which means I have to take off the whole back cover I assume that would be an issue.
comments? THANKS
my point for you cant complain was that you know it was only 5200 rpm but you were gaining 1tb worth of space..
and when i was reading up on a couple different drives i came across a few 5400's that did better write times than a 72.. im trying to find the article but i cant..
go ahead and believe multiple articles i really dont care but im saying theres at least one article which says that on occasion a 5400 rpm hard drive can out perform a 7200..