Easier to use? Lion is just as easy to use as Snow Leopard. If you don't like the changes, by and large you don't have to use them.Even though Snow leopard is easier to use, works more like a real desktop OS and definitely looks better than Lion the fact is that Apple's new software releases are often buggy. Considering how few hardware combinations Apple has to write for the fact that they release beta quality software just baffles me to no end.
Yes, clearly it's for adults if it's designed to be inaccessible and hard to use. Making things easier to use for the general public is a no-no and means it's for kids. Don't be so pretentious.The poor quality of the initial Snow Leopard release definitely caused some problems. Lion's bad press seems to come from a double punch of buggy release and just plain stupid OS design decisions some which seem to be designed more for kids than adults.
but then started really using a second screen and found that is where for me Lion shines when compared to SL.
So basically, the quirks of one app made you stay with Lion... that's fine. But many of us that went back to SL can say the same thing... Mission Control just handled things "wrong" for us.I love the fact that when I open my work VM and place it on the secondary desktop, it stays there no matter which desktop I am on on the main desktop.
So basically, the quirks of one app made you stay with Lion... that's fine. But many of us that went back to SL can say the same thing... Mission Control just handled things "wrong" for us.
Well put.Simple
1) You can't. Apple does not release drivers for new hardware. If I could put Snow Leopard on my Macbook Air I would.
2) Normally Apple improves the experience. i.e. OS9 < 10.2 < 10.3 < 10.4 < 10.5 ≈ 10.6 > 10.7
10.7 is the first time there has been a major decrease in UI quality. Most of the other releases were merely buggy until the .3 release or so. The problems with Lion are not bugs; they are symptoms of a poor design philosophy.
Are you willing to make the investment in software and hardware simply to run a different OS? Do you know if Windows 8 (or future versions) won't frustrate or annoy you as much as Lion does? Do you really think that Lion is an iOS sales pitch? If so, that's a foolish idea. Lion may have a few elements borrowed from iOS, but they're ones that you do not HAVE to use if you don't want to. For some people they're useful, and for the ones who hate them, they're out of the way.
Oh, I'll also note Snow Leopard got a huge amount of hate after it was released, too. Just in case some of you are thinking of saying, "But Snow Leopard was NEVER this bad!"
Why do so many of you think this? No we won't have too. We can skip lion all together... And if apple doesn't get there crap together by 10.8 (or 11.0...) we can use a different OS all together. lion is a joke... An iOS themed sales pitch for their notebooks. If people don't like it, then we wont use it. And based on the growth rate... that's quite a few people. Especially considering apple forces you to run it on new hardware.
Uh, correction, just few of you really. Re-check that awesome pole you created that shows that the MOST of us here like Lion. We don't need to use an aging OS such as Snow Leopard to get work done.![]()
So basically, the quirks of one app made you stay with Lion... that's fine. But many of us that went back to SL can say the same thing... Mission Control just handled things "wrong" for us.
I was in the same camp about contemplating moving back to SL specifically for Expose/ Spaces, but then started really using a second screen and found that is where for me Lion shines when compared to SL. I love the fact that when I open my work VM and place it on the secondary desktop, it stays there no matter which desktop I am on on the main desktop. That was one major complaint for me with spaces is that when I switched desktops I lost my VM, as it stayed on the desktop I just switched from. If I could merge spaces and the open desktop docking system of Lion it would be super joy for me. I have found Lion has been more productive for me once I abandoned the SL way of thinking.
so you don't really loose SL functionality in Lion by not using Full screen mode.
iTunes and QuickTime both force you into full screen when you want to watch something in full screen mode.
i started out on 10.2. with every new OS, i watch people wonder when the new OS is coming, craving change, enhancements, new stuff.
when the next OS comes, a lot of the same people get hysterical:
why'd they change that? why doesn't it work the way it used to?
then they adapt, time goes on, and they start craving...change, enhancements, new stuff.
eventually, most of these people will move to lion. then, one day, there will be 10.8, and the cycle will start over again.
hey, just my thoughts...!![]()
Heheh, in SL, you could configure any app to show on one specific VM or in all VMs.
Not sure what you are saying, unless you think VM means Virtual Monitor???
By VM I don't mean Virtual Monitor, I mean Virtual Machine (what a VM is). I have to run windows in a VM (I use Fusion, but that is my choice for compatibility with others in my organization). In SL when I opened my VM in the second monitor, it always locked there and didn't move when I switched windows. So if it was the on the second monitor in Desktop1, when I went to Desktop 6, my second monitor would display a blank desktop, and I had to go to Desktop 1 to get access to it again. Maybe there was something with my SL if it wasn't behaving the way Lion does now (doesn't matter which desktop is on main monitor, monitor2 always has my VM Fusion image accessible. If my SL worked the way Lion does, then I would have had even greater productivity.
I use VLC or another player I have to avoid this, or simply use my iPad to play videos. Now the question is: wouldn't watching videos at Full Screen while working affect my productivity?
----------
There are three kinds of people in this world:
1) Those who like change and adapt.
2) Those who complain and don't want to adapt, but eventually will adapt.
3) Those who completely refuse to adapt and are proud of it,
Where did *I* create a pole[sic]. Show me please.Uh, correction, just few of you really. Re-check that awesome pole you created that shows that the MOST of us here like Lion. We don't need to use an aging OS such as Snow Leopard to get work done.![]()
Where did *I* create a pole[sic]. Show me please.
I'll wait here.
I see. Mine never gave me that functionality on the second screen only my main screen had the floating functionality (which I keep as the built in display on my MBP). When I moved my Fusion to the second screen to display, it locked it to whatever desktop was displayed at the time. I always liked to use my second screen, as that is the larger of the two displays (and I hate running into strange issues when the screen was disconnected as I had in the past when I swapped them). I can definitely see the increase in productivity if mine worked that way (which is why I originally stated that if I had that functionality with Spaces functionality I would absolutely love it).
I can somewhat see the use of Mission Control, but honestly hate launchers and prefer to just use the dock (same impression about SL as well). I just open everything that I need and minimize into the dock or in the odd event I need something I don't normally use, I have the Application folder in the dock to get to it quickly (although lately have been relying on finder more and more). I am trying to refine my workflow to work more with me than against me!![]()
4) Those who follow without thinking
Not everybody opens their mouth when it starts raining piss
Heheh! I hardly ever use the dock. In reality, I found out it's much faster for me to COMMAND-SPACEBAR and type the name of the app I want.
Mission Control is great to delete apps and to group these into categories.
Might try this shortcut (I am open to trying new things that makes things easier), I just don't type very fast or accurate!