I'd guess that Google/Samsung/etc doesn't care about that, they might even be happy about it. Why? Because those who pick a streaming service based on whether it has The Beatles or not tend to be old. So, it works perfectly for Samsung's current strategy of calling iOS/iPhones/iPads/etc old.
I, like millions of people, have all of The Beatles albums, so I don't really need them available on a music service.
I have a subscription to MOG. It was around in the USA before Spotify and had higher bitrates until Spotify updated. I haven't bothered changing. I do have a free Spotify account that I got when they first came to the USA, but rarely use it.
I do like the idea of combining all of my hard drive music, which has artists like The Beatles, Def Leppard, AC/DC, etc.. that are not available on most streaming services. Unfortunately, I require an iPhone app, so Google is not the solution. Also, I wonder what they do with ALAC files? Do they treat them like iTunes Match and provide a lower rez version of them?
Currently, I use a combination of iTunes Match and MOG. The upside to iTunes Match is that I can tell it to play "The Beatles" via Siri and it will start playing. It is nice for using in the car via Bluetooth.
Vinyl vs Streaming services is really not much of a comparison. I have access to millions of songs from anywhere I have cell service or wifi with MOG. I can Airplay that stream to any Airplay receiving device I have around (and I have them in most of our rooms). Vinyl would suck in the car or when I am out for a jog. Vinyl is for listening at home, but your variety is still limited to what you own. I want to explore music, dig deep into artist catalogs, and be able to see recommendations based on my past listening choices. For me, streaming is a better choice...although I do occasionally buy a vinyl album.
The good thing is that paying for MOG does not prevent me from buying an occasional vinyl album. No one says you can't have both.