Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And now the real fun and games begin. Kid gloves are all the way off, gauntlet cast down, curtain raised, "To Arms" has been sounded.

Google wishes to supplant Apple. Apple will fight, and a titanic struggle it will be.

The loser of this war will be Microsoft -- Apple and Google will now attempt to out-innovate each other, and moribund MS will be eclipsed.

We are fortunate to have a real-life model of the Origin Of Species playing out in front of us.

What are you smoking?
 
It was a matter of time but I can't believe it took this long for him to resign. They might have got a letter from the FTC, it's been borderline conflict for months. The Chrome OS announcement was the final straw.
 
The ONLY way that Apple will be REAL competition to Microsoft, is for Apple to make OS X run on, and available to PC's (All PC's). Then, Microsoft would be more than a little worried. But Apple wants to make money on it's expensive hardware.

I find it appalling that some people just repeat what ever silliness comes out of Steve Balmer's mouth. This is a repeat of something hid dumbness said last week. Microsoft is terrified because they are losing groung for the first time. He only brings competitors when they are threatened and have no solution. He sells the expensive hardware idea, but when you buy a mac and have it last for 8 years and still be able to run the latest OS your total cost of ownership is way down.

The other side is resale value. Compare selling a 3 year old used dell ebay to a 3 year old mac with the similar hardware. The mac is still very close to it original price while the Dell is worth a fraction of its original price. Even though it started off more expensive. You can always by cheap junk that wont last. I use to sell Honda. My dealer at one time had a Hyundai dealership as well but even tho it was much cheaper and they started the 100,000 warranty it was just too much trouble because they were always breaking and the customers didn't care about the warranty then, the just wanted to know their could drive home when the got off at 2 in the morning and not be stuck on the side of the road.

You get what you pay for.
 
Microsoft Surface and Secondlight are certainly good innovations that Apple haven't done before, hmmm copying?

Apple didn't innovate the iPod either, there were other's out there and I seem to recall them using the design from PSION.

Apple are clearly abandoning their original user base of creative professionals and going after the iPhone mass-market. Their machines are nothing different than regular PC's now, apart from the OS.

I wonder how his depature will affect the two companies obvious previous tie-in's.... e.g. the irritating annoyingness that is locking Google.com as the search engine in he Safari toolbar.... (can't even change it to google.co.uk) and Google Maps on the iPhone, looks like old stevey might have to let TomTom in now!
 
Good question. I've been idly speculating, if Apple will ever attempt to get into the web-search fracas themselves. Interesting, but I doubt it. Unless you are correct, and Google and Apple start acting like victims of a nasty divorce with each other.

what about the creative zii egg. Is there a new google phone in the future?
Seems like google has the resources to develop a store.




"CNet Asia provides a hands on with Creative's Zii Egg and provides this photo (above). The Zii Egg is a multi-touch iPod touch-like device that runs Google's Android operating system. The device, though, bears a strong resemblance to the leaked bezel images, suggesting that it had simply been mislabeled all along. "
 
As much as people would like to blame this on the Google Latitude/Google Voice issues, this has been months in the making. Its a conflict of interest when your company, which produces a desktop OS, Mobile OS, and Browser has a CEO of another company that has a Mobile OS, Browser, and is working on a desktop OS on your board of directors. You think it would be ok if Steve Ballmer was on Apples Board of Directors?
 
Google simply is developing overlap products now that didn't exist at the beginning of their (Apple/Google) relationship.

Who got the most out of this temporary love-fest is to be determined.
 
I'm surprised at the speculation here. I have no doubt whatsoever this is simply about what Jobs said it was about - it's a conflict of interest to have the CEO of (what is quickly becoming) a competitor on your board. I see absolutely no reason to suspect there's anything else going on.
 
Sounds like Apple probably got sick of him trying to insert some logical sense into the precious Apple Knows Best Way™.

Disagree. Companies should not have their competitors' CEOs on the board. It's both bad for keeping business secrets, and frowned upon by the SEC and Antitrust agencies due to the possibility of collusion. Do you think it would be wise for Apple to leave themselves open to a possible future anti-trust action just so they can keep Eric on the Board?
 
Disagree. Companies should not have their competitors' CEOs on the board. It's both bad for keeping business secrets, and frowned upon by the SEC and Antitrust agencies due to the possibility of collusion. Do you think it would be wise for Apple to leave themselves open to a possible future anti-trust action just so they can keep Eric on the Board?

I can't say I disagree with you there.

I stirred the pot a little with cynical and snarky speculations, I didn't think people would be quite so riled over it. It has made a more interesting afternoon for me though.
 
They can still co-operate and compete at the same time. Just because he's not on the board anymore doesn’t mean Apple are likely to ditch their Google app links entirely. Friendly competition happens all the time, its only the crazy end users who seem to get all het up about it and act like they're at war with one another.

I think its good he's retired from the board though, that sort of conflict of interest isn't going to help anyone's image.
 
Eric has been an excellent Board member for Apple, investing his valuable time, talent, passion and wisdom to help make Apple successful," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "Unfortunately, as Google enters more of Apple's core businesses, with Android and now Chrome OS, Eric's effectiveness as an Apple Board member will be significantly diminished, since he will have to recuse himself from even larger portions of our meetings due to potential conflicts of interest. Therefore, we have mutually decided that now is the right time for Eric to resign his position on Apple's Board."
Speculation here.

We are looking at Android vs. iPhone and Chrome vs. Mac OS X as the conflict of interest.

However, it mentions potential conflicts of interest. Could Apple be looking more seriously at Cloud Computing?

Right now we can DL an iPhone app that works with iDisk. Other items can by sync'ed via MobileMe. What if Apple expanded in other directions such as:

- Cloud Storage. No not the trivial MobileMe amount. I'm talking serious storage as in 100's of GBs. Maybe upwards of TB storage.

- Cloud Computing. What about Web based versions of iWork along with an iPhone version. Seamless use across all three platforms (Mac OS, iPhone and Web).

- Automatic backup of iTMS purchases for a nominal fee. Be allowed to re-download any purchase made from the iTMS. What a wonderful way to back up your purchases instead of purchasing external storage such as NAS, Drobos, and other. It would be like AppleCare for iTMS purchases. With iTMS purchases increasing this would be a wonderful service for many. Simple, easy. It could work like the app store re-downloads.

With the new data center going in NC, this might be part of a bigger plan on Apple's part rather than just data redundancy.

What do you guys think?
 
I think it is a good move for everybody.

Competition between these two companies will be healthy, and this way there is no conflict of interests.

Agreed, but if Apple loses this battle, it could be the end of Mac OS. Personally, that would suck.

Chrome OS will be a genius child, Linux is still a teenager and Windows is an aging war veteran. I would rather not use any of them, yet.
 
However, it mentions potential conflicts of interest. Could Apple be looking more seriously at Cloud Computing?

What do you guys think?

I think that sounds reasonable. But I also think Android/Chrome vs. iphone/OS X is enough by itself, so I wouldn't say this resignation really adds (or subtracts) anything to your speculation.

Agreed, but if Apple loses this battle, it could be the end of Mac OS. Personally, that would suck.

IMO it will be a long time until Chrome is a threat to OS X. And actually, I'm not sure it ever will be; it seems targeted at a different market.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16)

QCassidy352 said:
I'm surprised at the speculation here. I have no doubt whatsoever this is simply about what Jobs said it was about - it's a conflict of interest to have the CEO of (what is quickly becoming) a competitor on your board. I see absolutely no reason to suspect there's anything else going on.

I echo your surprise.
 
Except that it looks like Apple DOES indeed know best, for a few years now, and they're putting the rest of the industry to school in the process.

If "freedom of choice" (whatever that means) was an actual problem with the Apple user base, we wouldn't see Apple products flying off shelves and the company virtually recession-proof.

Consumers vote with their wallets. And people are BUYING IN to the Apple ecosystem.

I'm surprised you don't understand the real benefits that accrue to the average user when they choose Apple, since you're on an Apple fansite and all. I'd expect such a myopic observation from someone on Neowin or Winsupsersite, not Macrumors.



Actually you have one of the many Mac Users that does not have his head in the sand. They don't want Apple to become another MS. To many when Apple gets big they tend to look & act like MS. They are afraid that if they look like MS to too great of an extent then the innovation may go away. It's getting to be that innovation is the only difference now.

Just open your eyes & really see that as in any discussion there is at least 2 sides. Both can be right & both can be wrong. That's just real life. Keep your head out of the sand.

By the way I've owned many Macs since the first Mac 128 that was later converted to a Mac 512. My last Mac is an Intel Mac Pro. I never have owned a MS-Dos Pc or a Windows PC. I was a convert from a CP/M Heath-Kit straight to the Mac. No Apple II heritage like some here.
 
Speculation here.

We are looking at Android vs. iPhone and Chrome vs. Mac OS X as the conflict of interest.

However, it mentions potential conflicts of interest. Could Apple be looking more seriously at Cloud Computing?

Right now we can DL an iPhone app that works with iDisk. Other items can by sync'ed via MobileMe. What if Apple expanded in other directions such as:

- Cloud Storage. No not the trivial MobileMe amount. I'm talking serious storage as in 100's of GBs. Maybe upwards of TB storage.

- Cloud Computing. What about Web based versions of iWork along with an iPhone version. Seamless use across all three platforms (Mac OS, iPhone and Web).

- Automatic backup of iTMS purchases for a nominal fee. Be allowed to re-download any purchase made from the iTMS. What a wonderful way to back up your purchases instead of purchasing external storage such as NAS, Drobos, and other. It would be like AppleCare for iTMS purchases. With iTMS purchases increasing this would be a wonderful service for many. Simple, easy. It could work like the app store re-downloads.

With the new data center going in NC, this might be part of a bigger plan on Apple's part rather than just data redundancy.

What do you guys think?

I actually got a survey a while back where they were asking questions regarding mobileme gallery including things like social networking stuff (you know, the throw a bunch of features on a list and have people rank them in terms of importance).

I'm not sure such a thing would have anything to do with this departure but I do think Apple is toying with this sort of stuff. I doubt they'd do a complete iWork online, though. Desktop suites just aren't very good when you make them web apps, at least not yet.

Just watch, and wait, and learn.

Survival of the fittest isn't a theory which applies only to biology. You get to watch corporate entities adapt and evolve, or slowly go extinct.

I'll use smaller words next time, K?

I find that people often fail to fully understand the significance of the word fitness when applying the theory of evolution to other things. Generational timescale is another important thing that is misunderstood. It's kind of like saying a kid putting his hand on a stove and discovering it to be hot caused him to evolve because the most fit kids don't. The claim fails for many reasons.

I can't say I disagree with you there.

I stirred the pot a little with cynical and snarky speculations, I didn't think people would be quite so riled over it. It has made a more interesting afternoon for me though.

Blame the avatar.
 
All these people quoting MS death are guilty of wishful thinking. Don't forget that just before iPod was released, your beloved Apple was not in the best financial shape. MS has posted a decline in sales after 34 years, how long did it take Apple to do that?

The point is that MS with its familiarity and affordable prices has had a more stable history than Apple, who buy other people's innovations and charge through the nose. A drop in MS sales in a time of global recession is to be expected, it can't be taken as an indication of a trend, unless you are going to extend your assumptions to every other market as well.

On topic its obvious why he resigned. His company now produces too many products that are in competition with Apple so he can't be on the board.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.