Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Looks like it’s true that Face ID is still ahead of the curve from others.....

Yup. How easily face ID was mocked in 2017 by others who stated it would ‘fail’, and ‘no one asked for face ID’. Yet, they set the standard in terms of biometric security with 3-D facial mapping, which any other manufacture couldn’t even replicate at the time. Now look at Apple, they created a biometric form security that is secure _and_ separated themself from these other half- finished security options that don’t seem to work with Google/Samsung.
 
The U1 chip? No it doesn't do the same thing.
Also the Soli chip does something before you even touch the phone. That's what I was talking about.

It operates with different principles, but it has the same net effect. It wakes the phone without an explicit action as the user brings it into an operating position.

Think about it in end goals, not the typical Android spec-chasing marketing talk.

Google just wants to reduce the notorious Android lag, so they use hardware to give it more time.

Now look at Apple, they created a biometric form security that is secure _and_ separated themself from these other half- finished security options that don’t seem to work with Google/Samsung.

And it still has a higher false reject rate than Touch ID both in normal use, and is unusable in common cases, such as in bed. Face ID was a step backwards to accommodate the bezel-less display.
 
It's ultimately faster, I don't see how it's irrelevant when it's impossible to unlock the iphone as fast no matter what you do.



Honesty to me it starts to look like you are the one that needs a win.
OK fine, You win. I hope you will feel better now.
I pick up my iPhone and it’s unlocked. How is my life improved if it unlocks a fraction of a second faster when it’s already unlocked when I’m looking at the screen?

I don’t need a win. I’m already using the superior device/ecosystem.
 
You get it wrong on two counts. First, many studies showed that before TouchID, a very large percentage of phones had no password at all, or an insecure one, so adding biometric security encourages people to lock their phones improving security.

Really? I suppose most people around me were a bit more concerned about their phone's security than the average person. Almost everyone I knew used a passcode before TouchID.
 
Post of the day. I completely agree with you.
Right? You can stick a finger pad reader on a phone but you won’t have TouchID. You can stick a facial whatsis on a phone, but you won’t have FaceID, no matter what your marketing materials say. Jobs was all about simple, which is absolutely not the same as simplistic. It takes great thought, care, and often intricacy to create something effective yet simple. He famously said, “Simple can be harder than complex: You have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple. But it’s worth it in the end because once you get there, you can move mountains.” From iPods to iMac hinges to A-series CPU design to FaceID to the W/H SoCs, these under the hood innovations hide a great deal of tech so customers can have a smooth, simple experience. Elegance over glitz. That’s the kind of innovation I respect.
 
The takeaway is with Face ID the threat of a random person unlocking your phone is near zero, while with Face ID the threat of a non-random person unlocking your phone may be high (if you believe YouTube as a non-anecdotal source) but the totality of it is infinitesimal.

With the s10 the ability to snatch and unlock the phone with a non-approves screen protector is 100%.

I’ll take my chances with Face ID.
[automerge]1571420807[/automerge]
It operates with different principles, but it has the same net effect. It wakes the phone without an explicit action as the user brings it into an operating position.

Think about it in end goals, not the typical Android spec-chasing marketing talk.

Google just wants to reduce the notorious Android lag, so they use hardware to give it more time.



And it still has a higher false reject rate than Touch ID both in normal use, and is unusable in common cases, such as in bed. Face ID was a step backwards to accommodate the bezel-less display.
Do you have a citation for “higher false reject” rate that’s from some authoritative source?
 
Is it just me or Pixel 4 is not very exciting?
Is it just me or is *nothing* product-wise exciting anymore?! I can’t remember the last time I was like, “wow, that is god damn incredible.” Probably the original AirPods if I’m honest.
 
Is it just me or is *nothing* product-wise exciting anymore?! I can’t remember the last time I was like, “wow, that is god damn incredible.” Probably the original AirPods if I’m honest.

not just you.....tech hasn't been very exciting in a while. iPhones included. We are getting incremental upgrades but nothing revolutionary. Companies are running out of ideas, I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GuruZac
It operates with different principles, but it has the same net effect. It wakes the phone without an explicit action as the user brings it into an operating position.

Think about it in end goals, not the typical Android spec-chasing marketing talk.
Sorry but I couldn't find any information to support your claim.
To me it seems that you just don't understand how the Soli radar works.
Maybe this will help you.

Google just wants to reduce the notorious Android lag, so they use hardware to give it more time.
I don't understand what lag you are talking about. What lag have you seen with Android phones when you unlock them?
 
Last edited:
With the s10 the ability to snatch and unlock the phone with a non-approves screen protector is 100%.


Anyway Samsung already issued an official statement. They will push next week an update to fix the issue with screen protectors that compromise S10's fingerprint sensor. So thta's the end of this story.
 
Last edited:
Since most people on iPhone disable the attention setting anyway the headline should be Apple admits security flaw by not having Lockdown mode.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
OK Google.

th.jpeg
 
Since most people on iPhone disable the attention setting anyway the headline should be Apple admits security flaw by not having Lockdown mode.

Apple wouldn't have the option to disable attention if it works. Plus, it's useless for squinty eyes, from sun, waking up, etc. Ultimately though is Face ID false positives that allow others to unlock your iPhone is a greater issue than open/closed eyes.
 
The case is much simpler, as a friend who just ordered a Pixel 4 pointed out, falling asleep on the airplane or in a cafe with your phone on the table in front of you.

Can you elaborate these scenarios because they sound absolutely ridiculous.

What criminals operate on flights and why are you routinely falling asleep in unsafe public areas?
 
Wait up. You seriously believe there are people who think google isn’t spying on them??? What planet have they been living on to think that still?

I, not too long ago wanted to delete Whatsapp, reason, owned by Facebook, lots of friends shrugged at what I had to say, same goes for Google, most people are not aware what Google actually does, I bet that even you and me don't know the whole story on security/privacy concerning Google or others.
Nobody knows how much data companies have on us, nobody.
 
The Apple m-series coprocessor does the exact same thing when you pick up the phone.



It is to the banks. Somebody steals your phone and unlocks Apple/Google pay. The way that works is exactly equivalent to somebody having typed in the card's pin, so thousands of dollars of fraudulent charges can be their responsibility.

Worse, in some countries, the burden of proof or presumption that those charges are unauthorized may be on you. So somebody stole your phone, flashed it by your face, and now you've lost many thousands of dollars.

No, someone stole your phone, flashed it by your face, initiated a transfer to a fake bank account they had set up in advance, authorised the transfer with a second face flash, deleted all emails and push notifications confirming the transfer, and now you've lost many thousands of dollars.

Or buy Apple products. And now you've lost many thousands of dollars.
 
You don't need to put glasses on someone to fool FaceID, you just have to make the appearance happen. So the usual lab method was to remove the arms from sunglasses and put the frame itself on a stick. Held 1-3 inches from the face caused no disturbance to the victim and still allowed the bypass to be effective.
This is a very easy experiment to replicate so I suggest you try it. I have. I have never been able to make it work. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying it won't work. I am just saying it is not as easy as implied and is NOWHERE near the same as the Pixel 4 issue.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.