Or, and I cant understand why people find this hard to believe, what they've got works just great.
A Motorola Razr from 15 years ago still works great, too, as does Windows 98. See where I'm going with this?
Or, and I cant understand why people find this hard to believe, what they've got works just great.
I think you’ve misunderstood like everyone else that’s replied, but at least yours is a reasonable and civil reply.Ah the notch controversy. You either hate it or "Meh, what's the big deal?" If they didn't have the notch they couldn't have the same Face ID tech with that footprint so the notch is there for housing the tech required for Face ID (not pointless). They could have just increased the "forehead" of the phone and put all that there, but then people would complain about large bezels. I'm in the "what's the big deal?" camp. I still don't understand why people in either OS keep comparing the tech they've chosen with each other. Are people that insecure about themselves that they use their phone as a statement of who they are? If you didn't buy the X don't complain because it's not affecting you in any way. If you did then you knew about the notch in the first place.
I thought the popular notion was Apple comes late to the party but does it better?
OLED on their phones and HomePod comes to mind.
I think you’ve misunderstood like everyone else that’s replied, but at least yours is a reasonable and civil reply.
I am not calling all notches pointless, and I wasn’t talking about the iPhone X, It was basically a dig on the fact that the Pixel 2 had iPhone sized bezels for no apparent reason (well, other than to have more internal space), and it was unnecessary and not utilised. (I.e. saying the Pixel 3 would have a top bezel and a notch for no apparent reason).
Most notches aren’t pointless, although st the same time they may be less justified due to the fact there is still a thicker top/bottom bezel.
Whether it’s better than a top bezel depends on personal preference and whether the phone manufacturer lets you hide the notch by having it act as a bezel but with the top bar still active. In 95% of cases where Android phones have notches, that will make the bezels even which is very important in my opinion. But anyway, contrary to what fanboys keep saying, the notch isn’t here to stay (on the iPhone at least), Apples design and engineering teams know it isn’t ideal and are working towards getting rid of it. Fanboys seem to think it’s a great design choice that Apple has embraced.
Now that android copied notch and UI gestures it’s Ok because the notch is smaller and the UI gestures subjectively improved. ROFL
How hard of an android fan boy do you have to be not to see the iPhone X had it right ALL along.
UI gestures improvements are easy updates with iOS and everyone gets them not just a handful at a time roll out like Oreo.
It makes me like my X that much more.![]()
Not entirely correct. Look at Android. They added fingerprint support only after Apple made it popular and same thing with notch and gestures... of course Apple also copied some minor things but not things that decide the future like mentioned above.
The issue is, even new devices ship with older OS versions on android. Its pretty annoying.
Security - Likely it's an old phone with the original OS and they don't have a problem with security.
This makes no sense. Flaws get found all the time and aren't patched on older systems.
Features - Likely that the earlier OS runs all of the features they want.
Rubbish. There's always features on newer OS's that people want.
Support - For what?
See above.
Stability - Likely that they are using their phone - email - texts just as stably as you are.
Nope. Software rots over time if it's not kept in check, especially if they're connected to the internet.
Longevity - they are still using it, so I guess that's longevity right there!
Yes, they're using a broken, insecure, buggy mess.
Google said they are doing this for the next billion smartphone users, which is dumb since gestures are not natural/intuitive for new users compared to buttons. And considering majority of Android phones are still on Lollipop/MM, and the next billion are coming from non-smartphones, and the fact that majority of OEMs won't adopt Google's UI (count how many Chinese OEMs are still using capacitive buttons on their phones), then yeah, I'll say it can take a decade or longer for these gestures to be "natural" for the next billion (ie. for someone to look at an Android phone and does the gestures automatically).
I don't understand why Google can't just stick with what Android did best, the on-screen buttons. It's like they are running out what to announce, and did this just so they can have new things to show.
No if it works what's problem do you think an update will solve?A Motorola Razr from 15 years ago still works great, too, as does Windows 98. See where I'm going with this?
Or people are happy with the thing they've already got. Why is newer all ways better?I think Android user communities have crossed the barriers wrt keep upgrading every OS iterations (both major or minor) all the time. I use Tab S2 running Marshmallow and I do not see anything wrong with my tablet without getting upgraded to newer version Oreo.
Most of the Android devices are optimised with the available base OS at the time of launch. When the base OS gets upgraded after some months or years of launch, the OEM need not upgrade the entire OS which may not be optmised for the older hardware. That's why custom skins sometimes implement features and functionality not available in the stock Android ahead of time, selectively (split screen, smart browsing are few examples where Samsung long implemented it before it started hitting the stock Android).
Also, this slow progression and adoption of fragmented ecosystem where latest OS gets adopted bit later, sort of mitigates any defects or security issues etc...from the mainstream user base.
Users are currently oblivious to the OS versions.
Or people are happy with the thing they've already got. Why is newer all ways better?
Or people are happy with the thing they've already got. Why is newer all ways better?
Great. Another thing to note when having a debate with an android fanboy about who copies who.
You keep repeating this to seeming random comments on this thread for some strange reason.
If you want to talk about that then you should also mention only 5% of those are on the latest OS - and that has been out for 9 months already.
5% of 90% is still a buttload of people.
That was not the premise of my point, now was it?lolz. Nokia, then Blackberry. If I'm not mistaken, Palm also had some gesture based control, not as good as Nokia or Blackberry.
Apple isn't the innovator of gesture based control. Look it up.
Well it is a lot more work to develop a feature-packed OS for around 60%+ of your entire iOS consumer base than it is to develop an OS that will come stock to maybe 5 or 6 flagship devices and will sit in development for compatibility issues with OEMs for a year or 2 before finally being released at which point two newer versions have already been released to the public.Doesn't matter. Everyone steals ideas from each other. The problem now is that Android looks and operates better than iOS rather than looking like it's 10 years behind iOS like it used to.
Whilst Google have continued to improve Android year after year, iOS has become a stale bloated buggy mess.