Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ah the notch controversy. You either hate it or "Meh, what's the big deal?" If they didn't have the notch they couldn't have the same Face ID tech with that footprint so the notch is there for housing the tech required for Face ID (not pointless). They could have just increased the "forehead" of the phone and put all that there, but then people would complain about large bezels. I'm in the "what's the big deal?" camp. I still don't understand why people in either OS keep comparing the tech they've chosen with each other. Are people that insecure about themselves that they use their phone as a statement of who they are? If you didn't buy the X don't complain because it's not affecting you in any way. If you did then you knew about the notch in the first place.
I think you’ve misunderstood like everyone else that’s replied, but at least yours is a reasonable and civil reply.
I am not calling all notches pointless, and I wasn’t talking about the iPhone X, It was basically a dig on the fact that the Pixel 2 had iPhone sized bezels for no apparent reason (well, other than to have more internal space), and it was unnecessary and not utilised. (I.e. saying the Pixel 3 would have a top bezel and a notch for no apparent reason).
Most notches aren’t pointless, although st the same time they may be less justified due to the fact there is still a thicker top/bottom bezel.
Whether it’s better than a top bezel depends on personal preference and whether the phone manufacturer lets you hide the notch by having it act as a bezel but with the top bar still active. In 95% of cases where Android phones have notches, that will make the bezels even which is very important in my opinion. But anyway, contrary to what fanboys keep saying, the notch isn’t here to stay (on the iPhone at least), Apples design and engineering teams know it isn’t ideal and are working towards getting rid of it. Fanboys seem to think it’s a great design choice that Apple has embraced.
 
I thought the popular notion was Apple comes late to the party but does it better?

OLED on their phones and HomePod comes to mind.

The irony here being that Apple really once were the epitome of market leadership. Now, they “do it better”.

Translated: - We Got Lazy - But Do You Care? Clearly Not, Just Look At The Shares! -

Well done, Tim. You’re right. BS Really Does Baffle Brains!
 
I think you’ve misunderstood like everyone else that’s replied, but at least yours is a reasonable and civil reply.
I am not calling all notches pointless, and I wasn’t talking about the iPhone X, It was basically a dig on the fact that the Pixel 2 had iPhone sized bezels for no apparent reason (well, other than to have more internal space), and it was unnecessary and not utilised. (I.e. saying the Pixel 3 would have a top bezel and a notch for no apparent reason).
Most notches aren’t pointless, although st the same time they may be less justified due to the fact there is still a thicker top/bottom bezel.
Whether it’s better than a top bezel depends on personal preference and whether the phone manufacturer lets you hide the notch by having it act as a bezel but with the top bar still active. In 95% of cases where Android phones have notches, that will make the bezels even which is very important in my opinion. But anyway, contrary to what fanboys keep saying, the notch isn’t here to stay (on the iPhone at least), Apples design and engineering teams know it isn’t ideal and are working towards getting rid of it. Fanboys seem to think it’s a great design choice that Apple has embraced.

Ah okay. I did misunderstand your original statement. A credit to you for clarifying it civilly. I have also heard of Apple working on getting rid of it and it was their original plan, however to get the X out in time they had to include the notch for functionality purposes. I own an X and I think its a wonderful phone for me at this point in time. It does what I need it to do. When I retire soon I am planning on switching to a more simple phone; one that only calls, texts and possibly takes decent photos. I seem to be part of a growing population who are planning to do just that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Appleaker
Now that android copied notch and UI gestures it’s Ok because the notch is smaller and the UI gestures subjectively improved. ROFL

How hard of an android fan boy do you have to be not to see the iPhone X had it right ALL along.

UI gestures improvements are easy updates with iOS and everyone gets them not just a handful at a time roll out like Oreo.

It makes me like my X that much more. :D

Essential PH-1 announced first (Notch) and shipped before iPhoneX.
Android didn't copy the notch.

Nova Prime and other Android launchers have had gestures for years. It just wasn't baked into Android.
[doublepost=1525882159][/doublepost]
Not entirely correct. Look at Android. They added fingerprint support only after Apple made it popular and same thing with notch and gestures... of course Apple also copied some minor things but not things that decide the future like mentioned above.

There were Windows phones that had fingerprint sensors.
Apple was far from being first.
They popularized them, but since Apple doesn't actually make a fingerprint sensor; they like everyone else had to wait until they became cheap and available.
[doublepost=1525882268][/doublepost]
The issue is, even new devices ship with older OS versions on android. Its pretty annoying.

Not starting this or next month.
Google has indicated that to get certification and use GAPPS, devices must ship with current Android.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
iPhone X actually copied Android with removing physical home button, swipe up gestures, horizontal slider bar, etc. iPhone X did it in late 2017 which is the driver for gestures while Android has supported no physical home button since at least 2013 and has had swipe up gesture along with horizontal slider bar since at least 2016 with Android 7.
 
2 observations:
#1 - Google Assistant is way more capable and reliable than Siri and it's only getting better with AI. Security wise though, Apple might be more trustworthy. But the sheer speed and accuracy of understanding of Google Assistant on an iPhone vs Siri is really impressive.
#2 - Google and Microsoft's demos are getting way more interesting to watch than the routine Apple Keynotes post Steve Jobs.
 
Security - Likely it's an old phone with the original OS and they don't have a problem with security.
This makes no sense. Flaws get found all the time and aren't patched on older systems.

Features - Likely that the earlier OS runs all of the features they want.
Rubbish. There's always features on newer OS's that people want.

Support - For what?
See above.

Stability - Likely that they are using their phone - email - texts just as stably as you are.
Nope. Software rots over time if it's not kept in check, especially if they're connected to the internet.

Longevity - they are still using it, so I guess that's longevity right there!
Yes, they're using a broken, insecure, buggy mess.

As previously replied before being deleted - No.
 
Google said they are doing this for the next billion smartphone users, which is dumb since gestures are not natural/intuitive for new users compared to buttons. And considering majority of Android phones are still on Lollipop/MM, and the next billion are coming from non-smartphones, and the fact that majority of OEMs won't adopt Google's UI (count how many Chinese OEMs are still using capacitive buttons on their phones), then yeah, I'll say it can take a decade or longer for these gestures to be "natural" for the next billion (ie. for someone to look at an Android phone and does the gestures automatically).
I don't understand why Google can't just stick with what Android did best, the on-screen buttons. It's like they are running out what to announce, and did this just so they can have new things to show.

You just repeated all the same things you pretty much said in your original post. Are you saying iphone X users are smarter or that the same types of gestures are easier on an iphone?

I've gone through this with the X and it's not that difficult to get used to even with them doing the closing the app gesture wrong.

Apple seems to be doing pretty good with their new gesture based device I think Android will be fine as well. Certainly not a decade long learning curve that's for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
Seriously, no one will regret the loss of the home button. I think copying some ideas from Apple, and leaving some out was probably a good move by Android. I wish Apple would copy their dynamic notifications and widgets. Apple's aren't implemented anywhere near as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
While this is all very interesting information, the truth is that 96% of Android devices in operation today will never be updated with Android P.

I say this as someone with a Samsung Galaxy S8+ sitting on my desk as I type this. It took Samsung over seven months to update it to Oreo. I just received the April 1, 2018 security patch this morning (May 9th).

As I have said before, I wish the Android OEM's were embarrassed by their lack of software support. But sadly, they aren't. And I have no idea what can be done to remedy that.
 
Why does everyone have to figure out who copied who? There's tons of stuff Android copied from Apple, and tons of stuff Apple copied from Android. We've come a long way from a time when DROID Does and iPhone Doesn't.

I've had both, with 4 Android phones and an iPhone 4s that lasted at least twice as long as any of the Android phones. Having used both of them, I would have to say that if Android actually worked properly, didn't crash, didn't have Bloatwiz and other skins crapping it up, and didn't have a gazillion gaping security holes, it would be the better platform, hands down. The ecosystem integration is better, the notifications are better, the customization is better.

All that being said, next time around, I'm getting an iPhone. I can't stand the unreliability of Android. Sure, SD cards are great, since they're cheap and you don't have to pay the Apple tax, but mine got corrupted. My whole phone is not even 2 years old, and the battery is unreliable, there's basically no first-party service from Samsung, and it's jerky and inconsistent. Sometimes it seems fast, other times it just hangs for a few seconds for no logical reason. iPhones are consistent and smooth throughout their life, even as they slow down a bit with newer software. Android phones often have better battery life when they are new, but they quickly become unreliable, having great battery life one day and lousy battery life the next. iPhones are much more consistent, and while they don't usually do as well with SoT, they do MUCH better with standby, especially with fluctuating signal strengths.

And there's no contest on security. None. Android is a freaking mess. The same permissions that let you do all sorts of cool things with apps are a complete security/privacy nightmare, Apple's walled garden, while it has big, tall, annoying walls, also keeps out the bad guys and the creeps a LOT better than Android. Oh, and because it's Apple, AT&T can't screw the phone up, or not allow certain functionality (VoLTE, VoWiFi) just because it's an unlocked phone.

I'm really hoping that they fix the iPhone X's reception problems and add 4x4 MIMO and B14 support on the new iPhones in the fall, as the iPhone X design is the future. I was skeptical. The notch is weird. But when I tried it in the store versus an iPhone 8 Plus, it's clear that the future is in the X design. It just feels so much more fluid and easy to use than having to use a button. Apple got the Paradigm right, now let's see if they can nail down the details like the lack of B14, 4x4 MIMO, the reception problems, and the meh battery life (although still far better than most Android phones).
 
I would like to see the “Shush” Feature being integrated in iOS, it is so much more convenient than the mute switch and/or volume buttons. You could do this a decade ago with Windows Mobile, nice to see it coming back.
 
I think Android user communities have crossed the barriers wrt keep upgrading every OS iterations (both major or minor) all the time. I use Tab S2 running Marshmallow and I do not see anything wrong with my tablet without getting upgraded to newer version Oreo.

Most of the Android devices are optimised with the available base OS at the time of launch. When the base OS gets upgraded after some months or years of launch, the OEM need not upgrade the entire OS which may not be optmised for the older hardware. That's why custom skins sometimes implement features and functionality not available in the stock Android ahead of time, selectively (split screen, smart browsing are few examples where Samsung long implemented it before it started hitting the stock Android).

Also, this slow progression and adoption of fragmented ecosystem where latest OS gets adopted bit later, sort of mitigates any defects or security issues etc...from the mainstream user base.

Users are currently oblivious to the OS versions.
Or people are happy with the thing they've already got. Why is newer all ways better?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
Or people are happy with the thing they've already got. Why is newer all ways better?

Change for the sake of change is not always better.
Newer is not always better.
Change and newer are marketing hype.

The fact that plenty of Android phones will never be upgraded is planned obsolescence.
If it can't be updated and there is some feature you want, they want you to go out an buy the latest widget.
Lack of upgrades forces you to buy a new device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
Great. Another thing to note when having a debate with an android fanboy about who copies who.

Well, it is more depressing that Siri is far behind Google Assistant. If Apple can't improve by the time WWDC. They should just remove Siri from iOS. It will be just embarrassing letting people use it.
 
I'm not going to rush out and get this one I don't like the idea of having to re-learn stuff. I'll play with it on a Pixel and see if I want to flash it on my phone when they drop in October
 
lolz. Nokia, then Blackberry. If I'm not mistaken, Palm also had some gesture based control, not as good as Nokia or Blackberry.

Apple isn't the innovator of gesture based control. Look it up.
That was not the premise of my point, now was it?
Doesn't matter. Everyone steals ideas from each other. The problem now is that Android looks and operates better than iOS rather than looking like it's 10 years behind iOS like it used to.

Whilst Google have continued to improve Android year after year, iOS has become a stale bloated buggy mess.
Well it is a lot more work to develop a feature-packed OS for around 60%+ of your entire iOS consumer base than it is to develop an OS that will come stock to maybe 5 or 6 flagship devices and will sit in development for compatibility issues with OEMs for a year or 2 before finally being released at which point two newer versions have already been released to the public.
 
I really hope what we are seeing with Google Assistant will make Apple finally take the time and money to make Siri great. Siri is a joke at this point.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.