I am using gforcenow to play any game I would normally play on pc. Playing battlefield 3,4,1,5. As a casual gamer I do not notice any difference compared to playing it on a windows pc.GeForceNow is really good for me. I was shocked at how good the latency was. I was even able to play an online FPS (Apex) and compete just as well as I do locally. It is dependent on your internet connection and how close you are to one of their servers obviously though so your mileage may vary.
Yes. 5 million. That’s a huge number of households in the market. Directv and Dish have 14 each. Charter has 15 million tv subs. Comcast has 18 million.
5 ain’t so bad now is it? Those companies have been at it for 28, 42, 60 and 59 years. Soooo…. Your point?
I still think 5 million is pretty small on the scale that usually keeps Google's interest. Roughly ~70M households in the US still with cable TV. Google's only movement has been to add channels, increase prices, and offer over-priced 4K packages.
Can't think of what might move the needle to encourage the kind of growth they'd need to continue offering the service.
Offering the same tired service over the internet, in a shrinking market, leads to people being happy about 5 million subscribers.I still think 5 million is pretty small on the scale that usually keeps Google's interest. Roughly ~70M households in the US still with cable TV. Google's only movement has been to add channels, increase prices, and offer over-priced 4K packages.
Can't think of what might move the needle to encourage the kind of growth they'd need to continue offering the service.
I don't think any of those have been around for 60 years lol. TV was all OTA until what, the late 70's? And it wasn't until the 80's when cable started taking off.Yes. 5 million. That’s a huge number of households in the market. Directv and Dish have 14 each. Charter has 15 million tv subs. Comcast has 18 million.
5 ain’t so bad now is it? Those companies have been at it for 28, 42, 60 and 59 years. Soooo…. Your point?
That is easy to say, but doesn't mean any big AAA games would want to come to the platform. There are few to no AAA games for the Mac, so why would you think they would come to an Apple TV like device?Apple Arcade is one of the numerous examples of Apple not knowing a single thing about services.
Imagine paying a monthly subscription for mobile games lmao. That trash literally litters the App Store for free.
Apple could have made an Apple TV Pro or Apple TV Play with gaming capabilities and a controller and support for big AAA games, but instead they made a dead-on-arrival trash service.
Look at the M-series chips…if they slapped a powerful one of those tweaked for gaming in an Apple TV Play they could have things like COD and other big AAA games. But at the end of the day unless you make your own AAA games there’s no reason to get into that anyway.
Apple Arcade is one of the numerous examples of Apple not knowing a single thing about services.
Imagine paying a monthly subscription for mobile games lmao. That trash literally litters the App Store for free.
Apple could have made an Apple TV Pro or Apple TV Play with gaming capabilities and a controller and support for big AAA games, but instead they made a dead-on-arrival trash service.
Look at the M-series chips…if they slapped a powerful one of those tweaked for gaming in an Apple TV Play they could have things like COD and other big AAA games. But at the end of the day unless you make your own AAA games there’s no reason to get into that anyway.
So 6% market share (76 million pay tv subscribers) after 5 years. Good job, Google.
I don't think any of those have been around for 60 years lol. TV was all OTA until what, the late 70's? And it wasn't until the 80's when cable started taking off.
You can do it through Safari. An app is unnecessary.Why is Apple not sued for cockblocking Xcloud on iOS? Everybody knows Apple is only doing it to protect Apple Arcade. It’s clear abuse of power.
It would be great for consumers if we could play Xbox games on iOS but it’s bad for Apple their $$$$$.
Yup, entering a market and offering nothing new or innovative leads to nothing more than a small dent in a continuously shrinking industry.Yes. Great job, Google. Competing against entrenched names, without any ability to offer double or triple play packages, or more recently quadruple play packages. Phenomenal, really.
Interesting. When I tested Stadia about two years ago I remember I thought the video stream quality was much worse (compressed) compared to that of GeForce Now, which had options to fine-tune this. Latency was also clearly better on the latter for me.As a casual stadia player, I must admit, out of all the cloud services I have tried (Onlive, PS Now, Xbox Cloud, GFN, and Stadia), Stadia had the lowest latency, best feel to it. I hope the tech goes towards a competitor. At the end of the day, nothing compares to my PS5.